Skip to comments.Anita Hill Explains How Joe Biden Screwed Up Clarence Thomas' Confirmation
Posted on 03/21/2014 7:34:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Anita Hill, the woman who accused Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment, on Thursday said that as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Vice President Joe Biden did a "terrible job" overseeing Thomas' confirmation hearings in 1991.
Hill said on HuffPost Live that Biden failed to call witnesses and experts to testify who could have shed light on the sexual harassment claims made about Thomas.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
‘Netta still trying to lynch the poor guy. These people NEVER give up. Never give up. NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER give up.
Drop it, woman. Go crawl back under the rock from whence you came.
Progressives are fanatics and should be dealt with like any fanatical enemy. No quarter.
What I remember was that she followed Thomas to a second job.
She made no complaints for ten years.
Then lots of people came forward to testify she was trouble and had a ton of problems.
Democrats and Barbra Walters loves her because she serves the accusations, but she was not found credible.
Biden has never done a good job and it is a shame and embarrassment the stupid people from his state keep electing him.
You have hit the key to their success. They do not give up. Any rational person will quit at some point. Not being rational they don’t know when to quit,wear a normal person down to the point of saying “we don’t care if you just shut up.”
Senator Biden was the first questioner. Instead of the softball questions hed promised to ask, he threw a beanball straight at my head, quoting from a speech Id given four years earlier at the Pacific Legal Foundation and challenging me to defend what Id said. I find attractive the arguments of scholars such as Stephen Macedo, who defend an activist Supreme Court that would strike down laws restricting property rights. That caught me off guard, and I had no recollection of making so atypical a statement, which shook me up even more. Now, it would seem to me what you were talking about, Senator Biden went on to say, is you find it attractive the fact that they are activists and they would like to strike down existing laws that impact on restricting the use of property rights, because you know, that is what they write about.pp 235-236 of "My Grandfather's Son" by Clarence Thomas
Since I didnt remember making the statement in the first place, I didnt know how to respond to it. All I could say in reply was that it has been some time since I have read Professor Macedo But I dont believe that in my writings I have indicated that we should have an activist Supreme Court. It was, I knew, a weak answer. Fortunately, though, the young lawyers who had helped prepare me for the hearing had loaded all of my speeches into a computer and at the first break in the proceedings they looked this one up. The senator, they found, had wrenched my words out of context. I looked at the text and saw that the passage hed read out loud had been immediately followed by two other sentences: But the libertarian argument overlooks the place of the Supreme Court in a scheme of separation of powers. One does not strengthen self-government and the rule of law by having the non-democratic branch of the government make policy. The point Id been making was the opposite of the one that Senator Biden claimed I had made.
Yeah, they're still fighting for Wallace, Rosenbergs and Hiss.
No woman ever accused those two fruits of harassing them sexually.
Don’t forget about Uncle Joe Stalin. Sure he killed tens of millions of people, but what ELSE did he do for his people?
Makes me wonder what they are researching on in regards to Dr. Ben Carson...
What I remember was that she followed Thomas to a second job.
Typical of a woman who has a crush on a man and he turns her down. The old saying “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned” likely applies here.
Joe Biden was a MAJOR backstabber. While everybody else chuckles at “ol Joe”, I distain him with a passion. ONe of his first votes in Congress was to cut off funding to SE Asia, which led to the slaughter of the Killing Fields and the Boat People tragedy. He also stood against Ronald Reagan in is fight against Communism. He also stabbed Clarence Thomas in the back (probably because he’s a Democrat and Democrats LOATHE strong black men).
As if Anita Hill’s word means anything.
She’s a bimbo.
Although, she’s correct that Biden is most certainly a bimboy.
Good way to forward an agenda. Sad way to live a life.
It’s part of the overall mantra of “being black” that one cannot think for her/himself. If you ain’t down with it - whatever the hell “it” is - you may be dark, but you ain’t black.
Anita Hill. My gosh. Here she is on HuffPost making a living from speaking engagements. It’s those who hire her that want to keep this thing going, regardless of its merit. Hitler’s Big Lie in action.
If they can’t find anything they just make it up.
This bitter bitch will go to her grave whining about coke cans and hating that she failed to bring down a good man.
She has as much credibility as the stripper in the Duke lacrosse team case.
And Dan Rather still thinks GWB doesn’t know how to fly a jet.
Anita is doing this to help Hitlery.
I wanted to ignore this thread, but I simply have to join the chorus.. She is scum, for what she did to this decent man with a brilliant mind. She forwarded a lousy mental picture to the whole country, about some dumb made up conversation. and they don’t care about it anyway...if the dems did, they would have been outraged at the treatment of a certain intern whose initials are M.L. by a certain Prez whose initials are B.C.
What I remember about this whole Thomas/Anita Hill debacle is that at the time, a greater percentage of the people believed Clarence Thomas.
A year later, after the press had slanted the story and rammed “sexual harassment” down our throats, more people sided with Anita Hill.
Says quite a bit about the corrupt bias of our media.
I believed Hill in the early 90’s. And I was forever turned around when I saw her (during the Lewinsky saga)on morning TV giving Clinton a pass by saying ‘well, you really have to consider his voting record’ in considering the sexual harassment charges against him. I had been a Feminist-lite until that time. It was then I realized that Feminists aren’t really for women, they are just for Left-Wing causes and USE women to further their radical agenda. Hill had said ‘women don’t lie about sexual harassment’. But all the women who came out and accused Clinton were liars and were to be destroyed?? Leftists are hypocrites of the highest order and get away with it because Big Media always covers for the multitude of LIES.
Shame on Huffington Post and Business Insider for publishing this. Anita Hill can yell and scream all she wants, she does not have to be published.
And I’m a regular reader of Business Insider, but not sure for how long.
Put another way, the idea that Men & Women are competing interest groups might have been a fit subject for ancient Greek comedy. It hardly makes for happy families with a constructive future.
“These people NEVER give up. Never give up. NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER give up.”
Very true. The left hammers away until it wins even if it takes decades. In contrasts the GOP, representing conservatives, seems to compromise at every turn rather than risk unpleasant confrontation.
Who wins 90% of the time? Those who aggressively promote their point of view or those who are willing to compromise principles?
Anita Hill is long past her expiration date. One wonders why anybody even went to the trouble of interviewing her, and in doing so, they ended up with less than they started with, which was nothing.
Well I guess Crazy Uncle Joe did something right.
Ha. She lied on a job application under “reason for leaving last job” and said “sexual harassment” and thought nobody would notice - until the “witch hunt” press found her and thoght they had the perfect weapon against Thomas.
It’s why she didn’t want to cooperate at first. They forced her so she had to run with it.
I was hoping that now, at her age, she would come clean. Nope...
Her publisher, here, does not apparently want to debate Mr. Justice Thomas' principles. They would rather try to revive a very old smear. Disgusting, but typical of the Left, which has always been hate motivated.
Anita Hill is positioning herself for Hillary’s
Campaign. They are friends. She managed to show up
When the Clinton’s visited Martha’s Vineyard
And run some sort of liberal women’s sessions
While there. Hill is up for the upcoming election
To pump up Hillary and to take shots at Biden.
Just another incompetent liberal female lawyer.
The first bossy sista
What a cow.
Yet all that Bill Clinton did is okay with her?
I would be really surprised if Ben Carson has a Hermon Caine problem,
and given that he is not up as a SCOTUS nominee and unlikely to run for POTUS (I think he is too smart for that) its not worth Dems trying to find a disgruntled Anita Hill to try to take him down anytime soon.
He's very unique, a rare gem in my Marxist state of Maryland.
When Biden was a senator, I opined that he was the most dishonorable man in the Senate, a title for which there is more than a little competition.
Killed several MORE million?
Nuts and sluts
It was after his property rights views became known that they went after him with Anita Hill's outrageous accusations.
Biden was a good socialist even back then. He said something to the effect that the government would go broke if it had to compensate everyone for property taken from them.
“At one point in the beginning of the proceedings, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Joe Biden asked Thomas if he believed the Constitution granted any sort of property rights to individuals as described in Richard Epstein's book Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain, which had been published by Harvard University Press in 1985. Biden held the book up for Thomas to see and denounced its contents. In their book, Epstein argues that the government should be regarded with the same respect as any other private entity in a property dispute. The Cato Institute later paraphrased Biden’s general line of questioning in the hearing as, “Are you now or have you ever been a libertarian?””
No kidding. These utopians overlook the *pesky* things, on their road to communism.
She says Juanita Broadderick and Kathleen Willey are liars.
But when it comes to the background of B0 Soebarkah, we are told to drop it, old news, that's been covered, it doesn't matter now, move on.
She also claimed that she was so distraught over the harassment that she sought medical treatment. If someone is as traumatized as she claimed she was, why would you actively seek out, repeatedly call, and request employment with the same person who allegedly did the harassing? She’s nothing but a lying beyotch. There were no other accusers at the time, and none have ever come forward in all this time.
Yes, exactly. This is factual. Biden was a back stabber.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.