Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Restaurants Would Have to Handle Customers with Food Allergies Under Md. Proposal
Crofton Patch ^ | March 18, 2014 | Deb Belt

Posted on 03/22/2014 8:39:25 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A new Maryland bill would let counties require each restaurant to have a staff member trained on food allergens, ready to advise customers. Is the measure needed?

County governments may soon have authority to make restaurants accommodate customers with food allergies.

A new bill would let counties require each restaurant to have a staff member trained on food allergens, ready to advise customers, reports WJLA TV. The bill would also require restaurants statewide to encourage customers to notify servers about their food allergies.

The Senate passed the measure 33-14 Monday evening. A similar bill is pending in a House committee.

Restaurants could post an advisory on the menu, asking customers with allergies to notify their servers. Or the server could ask before taking customers' orders, says CBS DC.

The Senate version, introduced by Sen. Jamie Raskin of Montgomery County, would not apply to service stations or vendors at carnivals and fairs.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: foodallergies; freakstate; landofpeasantliving; nannystate; restaurants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2014 8:39:25 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; cindy-true-supporter; ...
The Senate passed the measure 33-14 Monday evening. A similar bill is pending in a House committee.

Maryland "Freak State" PING!

2 posted on 03/22/2014 8:40:40 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I’m getting allergic to Maryland


3 posted on 03/22/2014 8:42:01 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I would like for the state of Maryland to school zipper manufacturers on how to caution men who have foreskins. Makes just as much sense.


4 posted on 03/22/2014 8:48:11 PM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Monty Co., called it!

This country is all getting absurd and insane.


5 posted on 03/22/2014 8:48:55 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Well, that’s gonna put countless restaurants out of business.


6 posted on 03/22/2014 8:48:55 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The bill would also require restaurants statewide to encourage customers to notify servers about their food allergies.

Delicious! The law states the restaurant must notify customers that customers must notify the restaurant of allergies.

7 posted on 03/22/2014 8:52:16 PM PDT by NautiNurse (Obama sends U.S. Marines to pick up his dog & basketballs. Benghazi? Nope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Teaching servers that “No XYZ, I’m allergic” does not mean “extra XYZ” would be a good thing. But it should be common sense, not a government regulation.


8 posted on 03/22/2014 8:55:29 PM PDT by Ellendra ("Laws were most numerous when the Commonwealth was most corrupt." -Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

no kidding.......and don’t for a minute think some people will dream up allergies just so they can sue restaurants....the onus will always be on the restaurant....


9 posted on 03/22/2014 8:55:38 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Why stop there? How ‘bout they take a complete medical history from each customer, check cholesterol level, blood pressure and body mass index? Then the customer could be handed a computerized Michelle Menu that that directs the idiot to a more healthy diet.

No fries for you, Bubble Butt!


10 posted on 03/22/2014 8:56:43 PM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; mrreaganaut

That is stupid for a law. Most restaurants are so scared of lawsuits that they already make adjustments and have lists of allergens and will prepare food differently if needed. MrR has severe food allergies and when we ask about what they fry in or if they could do something because of his allergies they are more than willing to help.


11 posted on 03/22/2014 9:00:05 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian. I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
And here I thought that when the customer has a food allergy, the customer makes choices in food that does not have the allergens. It's not the same as needing some kind of ID card in case of medical emergency that I can see.
12 posted on 03/22/2014 9:02:17 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Of course, they are handled by being tossed to the curb!


13 posted on 03/22/2014 9:11:21 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; ...

Nanny State PING!


14 posted on 03/22/2014 9:14:05 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Most laws having been written, I think legislatures come up with this sort of crap solely to justify their continued existence. And the sheeple buy it.


15 posted on 03/22/2014 9:14:16 PM PDT by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

And yet, it is STILL against someones ‘civil rights’ to ask for proof of their legitimacy to vote.

MAKE everyone get a card with a chip putting all their maladies and allergies on it.

Upon entering an eating establishment, present said card to be swiped with the data going to the kitchen computer and when customer places his order the kitchen computer will reject it if appropriate. Knowing they will go overboard and reject the order if ANY chance of violating.
This will cause a delay in ordering so it will be hours before the complete order can be filled. If someone in YOUR party is allergic to peanuts NO peanut by product will be allowed at YOUR table or the tables adjoining yours as we don’t want to chance wind borne peanut flecks getting to the ‘wrong’ plate.

So, with the servers now getting 20 per hr minimum wage and it taking 3 or more hours to get served, the prices will have to be raised to accommodate the wage and dead time in restaurant. This will cause the tip to be raised to 30 or 40% so a meal out will cost as much as tickets for 5 to the Super Bowl.

Of course we could also use the ‘HEALTH CARD’ to be shown when going to vote BUT that will be deemed ‘insulting’ the voter.

And the beat goes on....and on....and on....etc etc


16 posted on 03/22/2014 9:19:11 PM PDT by xrmusn (6/98 --"I would agree with you BUT that would make both of us wrong".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
LOL
WONDER if the little Amish Country Restaurant in MD. that I often eat at will obey this NEW rule..
very doubtful...

this state of Maryland is beyond believable..rules, laws, and crooks running the state...

17 posted on 03/22/2014 9:28:41 PM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeFault User

Yeah. I don’t see how any restaurant (very slim profit margins already!) could possibly afford to take on this liability. I suppose they could request customers to sign a waiver when placing an order.


18 posted on 03/22/2014 9:34:18 PM PDT by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

“Well, that’s gonna put countless restaurants out of business.”

Having someone get training in food allergies will put restaurants out of business?

There are many people with food allergies. Some of these people don’t eat in restaurants now, because it’s risky. Having someone in the restaurant who can explain that the nut dishes are prepared separately, that the seafood fryolator is not he one they use for french fries, that they don’t use milk in the breading on the fish, means more customers. Being told “don’t order the cheesecake if you are allergic to chocolate” avoids trouble and builds trust (trust= repeat customers).

Having someone die (or more likely lose a week out of work) because the waitsaff didn’t understand the risk will put a restaurant out of business faster than not training staff. Bertucci’s chain had a problem when a patron (Janet Walker) asked if their pesto was made with nuts- the waitress had been told not to reveal recipes and said no- the patron died from a nut allergy. The original wrongful death suit was over 10 million, settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. A little training would have avoided that.


19 posted on 03/22/2014 9:40:07 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

This will cut back on the willingness of restaurants to accommodate allergy sufferers. To be safe, they’ll just say what a lot of food packages say — that the food is prepared in the same kitchen as eggs, nuts, milk, etc. and “trace quantities may be present.” No need to have a maven present.


20 posted on 03/22/2014 9:44:02 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

” the customer makes choices in food that does not have the allergens.”

Yes indeedy, and how does the customer know that the restarant puts in a dish? The waitstaff has to be informed as to whats in a dish. Does the chicken pot pie have peas? If it’s not in the menu description, how does the customer know?

Do you cook your fries with peanut oil?


21 posted on 03/22/2014 9:44:36 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This makes no sense. The bill “lets counties require” the restaurant to have an allergen specialist? So it’s still up to the counties themselves? Outside of Montgomery and Howard I don’t see any of them “requiring” this. And from what I’ve seen, many restaurants already have a statement in their menus that says to let them know if you have any dietary requests.


22 posted on 03/22/2014 9:45:26 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Well it’s catch as catch can.

The default answer should be “We don’t know.” If the lawsuit didn’t teach that, I don’t know what will.


23 posted on 03/22/2014 9:45:46 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

“The law states the restaurant must notify customers that customers must notify the restaurant of allergies. “
A number of states do this now. Look at http://www.foodallergy.org/


24 posted on 03/22/2014 9:46:16 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is ridiculous. It is up to the person with allergies to ask if the foods contain allergens.

I have several food allergies. I don’t expect restaurants to be able to guess at them. I ask what is in the food before I order it. Any person with allergies does the same.

This is just another step towards a paternalistic world where no one is responsible for their own lives. Yes, allergies are a pain. No, the rest of the world has no obligation to watch out for your allergies.


25 posted on 03/22/2014 9:46:19 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

The customer can ask. And if the wait staff doesn’t know, they ask the cook. Is it that hard, really? The state has to step in?


26 posted on 03/22/2014 9:48:44 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Well, at least now I know California doesn’t have a lock on lunacy.


27 posted on 03/22/2014 9:49:18 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

I’m sympathetic to those with allergies, but frankly, anyone with an allergy so bad it can kill them who trusts a waitress ‘ s word on the ingredients of a particular dish is irresponsible IMO.


28 posted on 03/22/2014 9:50:04 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“No need to have a maven present.”

A couple people informed about food allergies is all that’s needed. The law puts the onus on the diner to ask, and the restaurant has to have someone who has a clue. About food allergies, and they are in the business of providing food. In a world where lots of people have food allergies.


29 posted on 03/22/2014 9:51:39 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

And they have to be there ALL the time... if one of them sicks out then what?

No, do not ask restaurants to be nannies. The default answer should be “we don’t know.” And it’s the allerginuts who have asked for that.


30 posted on 03/22/2014 9:52:54 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

I agree. The person should at least consult a cook.


31 posted on 03/22/2014 9:53:40 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Is it that hard, really? The state has to step in?”

Lots of people have no idea about food allergy issues. The state is requiring that some people get a clue. Get relevant information about risks that exist in their line of work.


32 posted on 03/22/2014 9:53:43 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

You are mixing two levels of concern. OSHA level stuff which might have to do with being allergic while working in a restaurant, and this new nannydom.

Sorry, America should not be DBrow-beaten.


33 posted on 03/22/2014 9:56:02 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“And they have to be there ALL the time... if one of them sicks out then what?”

This is not a complicated issue, the waitstaff needs to know what the kitchen is putting on the plates, it’s that simple.

If you eat out and ask, is this spicy, and the waiter says “I don’t know”, would you order it?


34 posted on 03/22/2014 9:56:57 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Why not let restaurants who want to take the trouble to be allergy friendly, be rewarded by patronage by the allergic? You want a nanny.


35 posted on 03/22/2014 9:57:13 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Spicy is on a different level than does it have this, or that, or the other allergen. Competent waitstaff would ask the cooks about spicy, and the cooks will know.

No DBrowbeating for me please.


36 posted on 03/22/2014 9:58:18 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Sorry, America should not be DBrow-beaten.”

So I should have no expectation that a food server has competence in knowing what they are serving?


37 posted on 03/22/2014 9:59:01 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

You want allergy friendly, let the market handle it. You are a camel nosing into a tent.


38 posted on 03/22/2014 9:59:52 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“You want a nanny.”

I want competent servers. Like I expect competent car mechanics.


39 posted on 03/22/2014 10:00:40 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

So in your world, if the dish is too spicy, you’d eat it and not send it back.


40 posted on 03/22/2014 10:02:24 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The Glorious Democratic Peoples’ Republic of Maryland seems absolutely bound and determined to self-destruct.


41 posted on 03/22/2014 10:04:33 PM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“You are a camel nosing into a tent.”

This proposed law stops moonbat lawsuits. It bats the camel on the nose.


42 posted on 03/22/2014 10:09:17 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

There’s common sense on the part of the patron and the restaurant and onerous requirements imposed by a state government full of individuals that have never run a business in their lives. That’s the central point.


43 posted on 03/22/2014 10:09:19 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

“onerous requirements”

Having food servers be made aware of the food allergy issues you know little about, is onerous? Education in an area that you don’t know about is bad?

If the patron says he can’t eat legumes, the food server should know what legumes are.


44 posted on 03/22/2014 10:14:43 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
You really don't see the insanity of requiring a restaurant to inform patrons that the patrons must inform the restaurant of their allergies.

When someone who can't swim arrives at the crowded beach, should there be a sign posted telling people who can't swim that they must inform the lifeguard?

If you are allergic to eggs and inform the waitress, does this absolve you of culpability when you order an omelet, or do you demand the restaurant to prepare an omelet without eggs?

Why is personal responsibility an antiquated concept?

45 posted on 03/22/2014 10:17:15 PM PDT by NautiNurse (Obama sends U.S. Marines to pick up his dog & basketballs. Benghazi? Nope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“...have a staff member trained on food allergens, ready to advise customers...”

Customer: “I’m allergic to this.”
Staff member: “Then don’t eat that.”


46 posted on 03/22/2014 10:18:04 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

“Why is personal responsibility an antiquated concept? “

Informed personal responsibility. You can see the water, but don’t know if there are almonds in your muffin, or walnuts in your pesto. Personal responsibility has to extend to the food server, who should know what they are putting on the table.


47 posted on 03/22/2014 10:24:11 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I would have the victim / allergy person fill out massive numbers of legal papers before agreeing to treat / feed them.


48 posted on 03/22/2014 10:34:27 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

You’re practically requiring said food server to have an M.D. I would consider myself lucky to have a waiter who spoke and understood rudimentary English. What are you gonna do about ones who don’t ? This law will do nothing but force restaurants out of business, something Democrat laws are excellent at doing.


49 posted on 03/22/2014 10:35:03 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

You should stick to triple-washed celery and carrot sticks. The rest of the world should not have to subsidize your personal need to harass restaurant workers with your muffin and pesto inquisitions.


50 posted on 03/22/2014 10:36:11 PM PDT by NautiNurse (Obama sends U.S. Marines to pick up his dog & basketballs. Benghazi? Nope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson