Posted on 03/23/2014 9:42:04 AM PDT by absentee
The White House banned journalists from accompanying Michelle Obama on her trip to China and explained that it was because the purpose of her trip is not political. Some news outlets even repeated the White Houses assertion of the non-political nature of the visit without mentioning that the press was not allowed to accompany them.
But in a speech that sounded at times to be extremely political, she also said the following:
And thats why its so important for information and ideas to flow freely over the internet and through the media; because thats how we discover the truth.So Michelle Obama lectures a communist police state about free speech standards, while the White House is spying on journalists and restricting access to information in the U.S.. Double-standard much?
(Excerpt) Read more at ijreview.com ...
Can’t make it up.
Shame is nonexistent in a world where morals are a fungible commodity.
As Ann Coulter noted about liberals, "as we know their evil is incalculable... Nothing too extreme can be said about liberals, because it's all true." (How to talk to a liberal (if you must), 2004, p. 12)
That's right. It's yet another vacation on the taxpayer dime. Why? Because she's exhausted from coming back from her last vacation so she needed another vacation which no doubt will exhaust her. But hey, that's why need vacations!
Considering that the Chicago Bears defensive linebacker is the CENTER of the world, then morality is whatever she defines it to be. For her, speech was always free, and since it does not concern the Chinese authorities, they have no reason or compelling justification to in any way limit whatever comes spilling out of her mouth.
Of course, she was already programmed to spew just the right mixture of social justice and blame for America to satisfy the controllers in Beijing.
It is not a matter of having shame for such a blatant hypocrisy. She simply does not KNOW that she is violating basic human decency and historical standards.
I don’t like her.
I'm fairly sure she doesn't see any contradiction at all.
Leftists do not believe in free speech
Thanks absentee.
Vatican Chief Justice: Obamas Policies Progressively More Hostile Toward Christian Civilization
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3136424/posts
No, no, no; she means free “approved” speech.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.