Posted on 03/24/2014 11:00:51 AM PDT by BeadCounter
LONDON, March 24, 2014 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Thousands of bodies of aborted babies have been incinerated, along with other “medical waste” in a process that was used to help heat British hospitals, UK media has revealed. The Daily Telegraph reports that more than 15,500 babies have been incinerated as “clinical waste” some of which have been used in “waste to energy” schemes to generate power for the hospitals.
The practice was discovered by Channel 4’s Dispatches investigative news program, which found at least 10 NHS Trust hospitals have been using the remains of aborted and naturally miscarried children along with hospital rubbish. The Department of Health has issued an immediate halt to the practice and Health Minister Dr. Dan Poulter has called it “totally unacceptable.”
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
Searched "prolife" and "abortion" here and did not find this story reported yet.
I am going to puke
we kill 3000 each and every day in the US
and you can thank progressives
THE FIRES OF HELL DO NOT BURN BRIGHTER OR GIVE MORE HEAT.
BURN BABIES, NOT COAL.
THIS IS THE FACE OF CONSUMMATE EVIL.
Killing is killing, that’s right, so they incinerate them in the UK and that is cold blooded but we may well have more abortions per capita here all the same. I think I did read that once but the percentages are somewhat close.
Isn’t it true that aborted baby human parts are tossed in with everything else that a hospital or medical center dispenses with as “medical waste?”
In other words, the bigger story is that human body parts are tossed out in with segregated medical trash, as opposed to office administrative paperwork trash, or food trash, or a special category of “trash” for human body parts.
Yes?
Anybody know the details of how medical facilities handle recyclable trash, food trash, privacy act trash, infectious disease trash, body fluid trash, body parts trash, etc.
And... doesn’t the burning of fetal material contribute to global warming and longer search times for downed airliners?
Moloch, please pick up the white courtesy phone.
What better place to hide the death camps than calling them hospitals and place them in plain sight...
“Sorry, he’s busy playing golf with the US President right now, may I take a message?”
Which is precisely what the Nazis did while refining the industrial process to achieve a larger scale of production.
per capita, the US is around 22 and the UK is around 17.
killing may be killing... but the US has no grounds on which to criticize
UK appears (and USA Obamacare too) to just be following the plan....
see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_eugenics#Nazi_eugenics_institutions
How soon before mac daddy gleefully issues an executive order making this the mandatory as the way to dispose of murdered babies for money solution?
I suspect that he would do it on fathers day as a slap in the face to America.
Why is burning the remains “totally unacceptable” but aborting them not? They don’t consider them human after all, so what’s the problem?
‘Soliant Green’
Not long now! coming soon to an athiest country near you all in the name of . . . whatever
You are correct, aborting them is the wrong.
But I’d say what is alarming here is the fact that the state is doing it, say if under Obamacare/ACA, the government did this kind of thing.
We in America have our faults like the abortionists who abort after the baby is born but is that worse than doing abortion in the woman’s body?? I’m just speaking as a sort of devil’s advocate position because all abortion is wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.