Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Permanent’ custody of Justina Pelletier awarded to Mass.
BOSTON GLOBE ^ | Patricia Wen

Posted on 03/25/2014 3:01:56 PM PDT by Morgana

A long-running child custody case took a dramatic turn Tuesday, when a Massachusetts juvenile court judge awarded “permanent” custody of teen-ager Justina Pelletier to the state Department of Children and Families.

The ruling by Judge Joseph Johnston leaves it up to the agency, not the court, to decide whether or when Pelletier should be returned to her West Hartford, Conn., home.

“It’s a huge ruling,” said a person who had been briefed on the decision. “It’s a setback for the parents.”

This person said the state, which has had temporary custody of Pelletier for more than a year, has no immediate plans to have the 15-year-old sent back home, or to a facility in her home state.

But a decision to award permanent custody can be revisited by the judge after six months, at the parents’ request. The judge made his order retroactive to late December, so a review could occur as soon as early summer.

Rev. Patrick Mahoney of the Washington D.C.-based Christian Defense Coalition, who has become the parents’ spokesman, said Tuesday that Lou and Linda Pelletier are “outraged” by the decision, though they have yet to get a written copy of it.

“There is no reason Justina should not be returned immediately back to the parents,” he said.

Mahoney said the parents continue to believe that their daughter is being “treated as a pawn and piece of property.”

Judge Johnston also denied a request by out-of-state lawyer Mathew Staver of Liberty Counsel in Florida to represent the girl’s parents.

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonglobe.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: injustice; justinapelletier; moralabsolutes; pelletier; prolife; taxachusetts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last
To: Valpal1

It’s a final judgment and fully appealable.


41 posted on 03/25/2014 4:07:44 PM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I wonder if the dad puts out the call, if patriots would respond. Go and get your child.


42 posted on 03/25/2014 4:10:02 PM PDT by icwhatudo (Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

I’m with you.


43 posted on 03/25/2014 4:21:05 PM PDT by Ghost of SVR4 (So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

A precedent has been set. Mission complete. Beware of what lies ahead. It’s coming, folks.


44 posted on 03/25/2014 4:44:00 PM PDT by Obama_Is_A_Feminist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Would be awesome if the SEALs intervened, but that would only get them assigned to a doomed helicopter ride in some remote place like Extortion 17 was.


45 posted on 03/25/2014 4:46:09 PM PDT by Obama_Is_A_Feminist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: conservativeinbflo.
Mr. Pelletier should just tell the Democratic judge

The judge is a Republican, appointed by Governor Swift.

46 posted on 03/25/2014 4:49:43 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Republicans don’t do this, so he must be one IN NAME ONLY, like Boehner, Graham, McCain, blah blah blah.


47 posted on 03/25/2014 4:52:31 PM PDT by Obama_Is_A_Feminist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_A_Feminist

Just seems like there has to be moment. A moment when citizens say enough is enough. Some sort of spark. Are only the people in Venezuela and Ukraine brave enough to take to the streets? I wish the dad would put out the call. Thousands of activists storming the hospital and rescuing this poor girl could be the start of something bigger...


48 posted on 03/25/2014 4:56:11 PM PDT by icwhatudo (Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
The judge's decision is here.
49 posted on 03/25/2014 5:02:57 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
This case reminds me of the Terry Schindler Schiavo case, where a judge ordered that Terry be dehydrated and starved to death. He not only said that the feeding tube had to be removed but no one was allowed to feed her or give her water by mouth.

Terry was made into a test case giving the Government the right to kill us if the government decides we have a low quality of life. Is this young girl some kind of test case too? Is this case for setting some kind of precedent to allow the state to arbitrarily decide to take the children away if the state disagrees with how the parents are raising their children.

50 posted on 03/25/2014 5:08:03 PM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I have some familiarity of the inner workings of both Children’s Hospital and the Floating Hospital for Children (Tufts). Obviously, CH cannot respond to the various accusations against them without violating HIPAA.

I think it is very, very, very unlikely that CH has this one wrong. For them to take the position they have taken, all the facts must have been reviewed by the service chiefs, by the board, by house and outside counsel, by HMS and by CRICO. It is impossible to believe that there is not compelling evidence of Munchausen’s by proxy.

Of course the first-line clinical staff could have gotten this wrong. But the further up the line it went, the more likely it is that error would have been corrected. The stakes, if they are wrong, are enormous. Institutions like CH do not support errors by first-line staff. They just don’t. There is too much at stake.

Mass DCYF, of course, has no credibility, nor should they. But they are not the drivers of this scenario, they are just along for the ride.


51 posted on 03/25/2014 5:16:33 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

The state will also make the parents pay child support.


52 posted on 03/25/2014 5:22:44 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

The judge seems to be shifting as much blame as he can onto CT DCF and the “uncooperative” parents.


53 posted on 03/25/2014 5:32:29 PM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
...this court has found that Justina suffers from persistent and severe Somatic Symptom Disorder.

A court diagnosis?

Pinch me. Please.

54 posted on 03/25/2014 5:38:31 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (The bill was the subject of a truly awe-inspiring tsunami of poorly informed indignation. Rich Lowry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

“I think it is very, very, very unlikely that CH has this one wrong. For them to take the position they have taken, all the facts must have been reviewed by the service chiefs, by the board, by house and outside counsel, by HMS and by CRICO. It is impossible to believe that there is not compelling evidence of Munchausen’s by proxy.

Of course the first-line clinical staff could have gotten this wrong. But the further up the line it went, the more likely it is that error would have been corrected. The stakes, if they are wrong, are enormous. Institutions like CH do not support errors by first-line staff. They just don’t. There is too much at stake.”

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Munchausen syndrome by proxy. So that is what you believe this to be? That might explain a kid who was ice skating about a year ago and is now in and out of the hospital.

The only other thing and I’ve seen this before is the kid has some rare genetic illness that that is extremely hard to find. I’ve read stories about this. They think the mom had Munchausens only to find some rare disease and it took some doctor either from across the US or across the world to find it.


55 posted on 03/25/2014 5:40:42 PM PDT by Morgana (Wagglebee please come home we miss you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Munchausen syndrome by proxy. So that is what you believe this to be?

I have no idea what the diagnosis is.

I don't have the records, I don't have the consultant reports, I don't have the Xrays, and I haven't examined the child.

Therefore, I have absolutely no basis whatsoever to have an opinion.

Do you?

56 posted on 03/25/2014 5:45:06 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1; Lurking Libertarian
The judge seems to be shifting as much blame as he can onto CT DCF and the “uncooperative” parents.

This decision reads like a gossip on a high schooler's Facebook page.

57 posted on 03/25/2014 5:46:22 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (The bill was the subject of a truly awe-inspiring tsunami of poorly informed indignation. Rich Lowry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

QUOTE: “The judge made his order retroactive to late December, so a review could occur as soon as early summer.”

I assume this is a State judge. State judges do endeavor to reduce the liability of the State, it’s their employer you know. So now with one sweeping decision all that has come to light recently...all that happened while the State had custody...boy that’s convenient -retroactively.

If you want to sue a State you need a civil rights claim that can be brought in a Federal court. When State officials see their home, car, boat and listed in a lawsuit then they run scared. And, for the next five years when they go to get that loan or insurance the standard question will appear: “Are you involved in any litigation?” To which they will have to respond: “Ah...well...there is this lawsuit for $3 mil, but don’t worry I work for the State and they’ll have to may for my incompetence”.


58 posted on 03/25/2014 5:52:40 PM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

If you think you can take my guns from “my cold dead hands,” try taking my children and see how that works out for ya...


59 posted on 03/25/2014 6:04:32 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back The Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

..........your post suggests you might know something about this “legal” malaise.

The judge ruled that the parents are guilty of “medical child abuse”...............can you explain that to all of us. I mean, if the parents were just off on a tangent and endangering the child that’s one thing. But, according to what I read, they have a pretty substantial team of doctors ON THEIR SIDE! If so, how the hell does the state butt in at all?

I’ve followed this case fairly closely and I’m still shaking my head.


60 posted on 03/25/2014 6:13:45 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson