Skip to comments.My Trip to the Pot Shop
Posted on 03/26/2014 4:01:42 AM PDT by Kaslin
PUEBLO WEST, Colo. -- It's 9 a.m. on a weekday, and I'm at the Marisol Therapeutics pot shop. This is serious business. Security is tight. ID checks are frequent. Merchandise is strictly regulated, labeled, wrapped and controlled. The store is clean, bright and safe. The staffers are courteous and professional. Customers of all ages are here.
There's a middle-aged woman at the counter nearby who could be your school librarian. On the opposite end of the dispensary, a slender young soldier in a wheelchair with close-cropped hair, dressed in his fatigues, consults with a clerk. There's a gregarious cowboy and an inquisitive pair of baby boomers looking at edibles. A dude in a hoodie walks in with his backpack.
And then there's my husband and me.
The dispensary is split in two: "recreational" on one side, "medical" on the other. Medical customers must have state-issued cards and doctor's approval. The inventory is not taxed, so prices are lower on that side. On the recreational side, where I'm peering at mysterious jars of prickly green goods, "Smoke on the Water" is thumping from stereo speakers. Yes, there's a massive banner advertising a Tommy Chong appearance, and issues of "High Times" are on display. But the many imposing signs posted on the wall emphatically warn: No smoking, no open drug consumption, and absolutely no entry allowed into the locked lab where the cannabis plants sit under bright lights.
Before I tell you how and why my hubby and I ended up at Marisol Therapeutics, some background about my longtime support of medical marijuana: More than 15 years ago in Seattle, while working at The Seattle Times, I met an extraordinary man who changed my mind about the issue. Ralph Seeley was a Navy nuclear submarine officer, pilot, cellist and lawyer suffering from chordoma, a rare form of bone cancer that starts in the spine. He had undergone several surgeries, including removal of one lung and partial removal of the other, and was confined to a wheelchair.
Chronically nauseous from chemotherapy and radiation, weak from a suppressed appetite, and suffering excruciating pain, Seeley turned to marijuana cigarettes for relief.
Contrary to cultural stereotype, Seeley was far from "wasted." While smoking the drug to reduce his pain, he finished law school -- something he couldn't have done while on far more powerful "mainstream" narcotics, which left him zonked out and vomiting uncontrollably in his hospital bed after chemo. Seeley had the backing of his orthopedic doctor and University of Washington School of Medicine oncologist Dr. Ernest Conrad. He took his plight to the Washington state supreme court, where he asserted a constitutionally protected liberty interest in having his doctor issue a medical pot prescription.
The court rejected Seeley's case for physician-prescribed marijuana, arguing that the government's interest in preserving an "interlocking trellis" of costly and ineffective War on Drug laws trumped his right to individual autonomy and physician treatment. After a decade-long battle with cancer, Seeley died in 1998. But his spirit persevered. Seeley bravely paved the way for medical marijuana laws in nearly two dozen states, including Washington's Initiative 692, approved by voters 10 months after he died, and Colorado's Amendment 20, passed by popular referendum in 2000.
Support for these ballot measures and similar efforts (like the newly enacted Charlee's Law in Utah legalizing medical cannabis oil) transcends political lines. Why? Because cancer, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis and other chronic and terminal diseases have no partisan affiliations.
This brings us back to Pueblo. For the past three months, my mother-in-law, Carole, whom I love with all my heart, has battled metastatic melanoma. After a harrowing week of hospitalization and radiation, she's at home now. A miraculous new combination of oral cancer drugs seems to have helped enormously with pain and possibly contained the disease's spread. But Carole's loss of appetite and nausea persist.
A month ago, with encouragement from all of her doctors here in Colorado, she applied for a state-issued medical marijuana card. It still hasn't come through. As a clerk at Marisol Therapeutics told us, there's a huge backlog. But thanks to Amendment 64, the marijuana drug legalization act approved by voters in 2012, we were able to legally and safely circumvent the bureaucratic holdup. "A lot of people are in your same situation," the pot shop staffer told us. "We see it all the time, and we're glad we can help."
Our stash included 10 pre-rolled joints, a "vape pen" and two containers of cheddar cheese-flavored marijuana crackers (they were out of brownies). So far, just one cracker a day is yielding health benefits. Carole is eating better than she has in three months. For us, there's no greater joy than sharing the simple pleasure of gathering in the kitchen for a meal, with Grandma Carole at the head of the table.
Do I worry about the negative costs, abuses and cultural consequences of unbridled recreational pot use? Of course I do. But when you get past all the "Rocky Mountain High" jokes and look past all the cable-news caricatures, the legalized marijuana entrepreneurs here in my adopted home state are just like any other entrepreneurs: securing capital, paying taxes, complying with a thicket of regulations, taking risks and providing goods and services that ordinary people want and need. Including our grateful family.
Glad to hear her mother-in-law is doing better. Seems that compassion outside of having to go through something like that is rare though.
There should be a double emphasis that the author is MM herself!!!!!!!!!
The law abiding suffer while all the effort and money goes into beating up the dealers, producers, and users, to what end?
Please remember this article is about a single product that has nothing to do with narcotics trafficking.
A product by the way that is still a federal crime to possess.
Please notice also that the federal push back on state sovereignty seems to be focused on an illegal substance rather than the pursuit of God given rights. On the one hand CO has legalized a federally prohibited product, and on the other cannot muster the proper vote on legislation that puts the fringe on “shall not be infringed”.
Clearly Michelle Malkin is just another one of those doper libtards who want to bring the country down. /s
As I clicked on “new posts to you” I thought, here it comes.
Thanks for what IMHO is the correct response.
What is a vape pen?
PS, not only a ‘99er, but a Christmas day ‘99er.
Truly tragic to see MM (who I admired greatly before this) support the Marxists effort to put the final nail in America’s coffin, by getting the population stoned on pot.
A refillable e-cigarette for pot. There’s no smoke and practically no smell so people frequently use them in public.
Same thing as an e-cigarette.
Just so we’re clear, I was being sarcastic. Others (see above) are not.
Like an e-cigarette, but instead of the cartridge delivering nicotine, it delivers weed.
The staffers are courteous and professional.”
the guy pictured may be couteous but he looks exactly like what I’d expect to see in a dope shop. And “professional” ain’t it.
Blast that Tenth Amendment!
Oh, please. Pot wasn't even illegal until the 1920's, so it has been legal longer than it has been illegal.
The article has nothing to do with MM supporting 'getting stoned' either, which you would notice if you'd read the article instead of knee-jerking into melodramatic swill mode.
I was born in the dark but it wasn’t last night. “Medicinal” marijuana was the camel’s nose in the tent. Marijuana use can cause nausea as well.
If momma can eat a cheese cracker and feel better, what does that have to do with some guy legally smoking skunkweed just to get stoned? If you want to legalize it, just legalize it. Don’t hide behind a medicine label.
If marijuana is just medicine, make it prescription only. Morphine and antibiotics are medicine. Why don’t we just legalize them so people can have them at will as well? FREEDOM! War on drugs!
“Marijuana cigarette”. Geez.
Many, many moons ago, my uncle was undergoing chemo and his doc "mentioned in passing" (wink wink) that pot would help. Of course it was illegal, but Unc said "Of course I'll try it. What are they going to do, give me cancer?" If nothing else, it kept him comfortable and helped him get to sleep.
The Feddle Gov't is foolish to regulate heavy-duty drugs that can actually work. Of course, they're equally foolish to de-regulate heavy-duty drugs simply for recreational use, as well. IMO, I agree with MM - the question is best left to the states.
>>>Blast that Tenth Amendment!<<<
While there is a 10th Amendment argument that states rather than the Feds should ban this poison, MM is not making that argument.
She is essentially calling pot a “wonder drug” that makes Mom-in-law’s cancer an almost pleasurable experience and HELPS people achieve academically and graduate from law school.
The legalize and legitimize pot movement is in lockstep with the homosexualist movement to legitimize sodomy. It is a naked attempt to undermine American society and turn us into a nation of brain dead, semi-conscious fairies, unable to provide for themselves, much less defend our nation.
The only real question is whether we will be better off being enslaved by the Russians or the Chinese. I lean towards China...the food is better.
>>>Oh, please. Pot wasn’t even illegal until the 1920’s, so it has been legal longer than it has been illegal.<<<
That was before America was a welfare state. If 47% percent are paying no taxes and 47 million are on food stamps now, wait 20 years. When half of the next generation of American children is raised by semi-conscious potheads and are abusing pot by the time they are 9 years old, 70% will be paying no taxes and there will be 100 million on food stamps (and weed stamps).
The only possible bright side is that the small minority of us who remain straight, sober and armed might be able to easily take back America from these hoards of brain dead sissies.
Please show me the federal government’s Constitutional authority to instigate the ‘War on Drugs’.
Legal pot is a great strategy to bring more Democrats into Colorado. As if there weren’t too many already! Thanks for nothing California.
I see more than enough hyperbole to go around on both sides. The idea seems to be that whoever can come up with the biggest bucket of pejoratives wins, and while it might be good entertainment it’s a sorry assed way to make public policy.
Don't try to change the subject to avoid the issue.
Dave's not here!
Please show the Constitutional authority to instigate the ACA.
I won't play the stupid tit for tat game with you, the subject was the War on Drugs.
Please answer the question.
Please read the article. They tried to go the “medical marijuana” route and have had their application stuck in bureaucracy. They resorted to buying legal recreational marijuana - hence the crackers as well as other delivery forms.
How do you think that we got to high numbers of people on social welfare of some sort now. We have had a breakdown of family from many sources, including the use of legal intoxicants - alcohol.
It is a free choice issue. We have free choice to be accept Christ as our Savior, and we should have free choice on what we want to do with our lives.
I choose to live my life intoxicant free, do not drink, smoke tobacco or pot, but if that makes you happy, more power to you as long as you are not infringing on my happiness or safety.
We found a Witch! Burn her!
Isn’t that something surfers used to say?
I have never surfed... other than the Web... Not a big ocean kinda guy; can’t stand the thought of things swimming around under me with teeth, in their element...
I’m a mountains person!
There's still sharp things at the bottom. The only difference is they don't come to you, gravity will take you to them :).
Thought this was interesting
Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome is a disorder that is characterized by recurrent nausea, vomiting and colicky abdominal pain. These symptoms have been reported to be alleviated temporarily by taking a hot shower or bath or more permanently by abstaining from the use of cannabis. The syndrome was described by Allen and colleagues (2004), and Sontineni and colleagues (2009) who offer simplified clinical diagnostic criteria. A subsequent, larger study reported a case series of 98 subjects with cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, confirming the earlier reported findings.
2 Clinical presentation
5 Further reading
Cannabinoid hyperemesis was first reported in the Adelaide Hills of South Australia. Since then, several cases have been recognized worldwide. Cannabis is by far the most widely cultivated, trafficked and used illicit drug. In the present decade, cannabis use has grown more rapidly than cocaine and opiate use. The most rapid growth in cannabis use since the 1960s has been in developed countries in North America, Western Europe and Australia. Cannabis has become more closely linked to youth culture and the age of initiation is usually lower than for other drugs.
Cannabis has been used recreationally for millennia. Some chronic negative health effects of the drug have only recently surfaced. The long-term and short-term toxicity of cannabis abuse is associated with pathological and behavioural effects leading to a wide variety of effects on the body systems and physiologic states. The phenomenon of cannabinoid hyperemesis and clinical diagnosis remained obscure until recently even though its features were beginning to be understood by leading physicians worldwide. In spite of these early reports, uncertainty remained among the doctors and scientists regarding the existence of the cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome. Sontineni and colleagues (2009) discuss the cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome to offer guidelines for the clinical diagnosis. The “suggested criteria for the diagnosis” are: Essential feature: 1) history of regular cannabis use for years; Major clinical features of syndrome: 2) severe nausea and vomiting, 3) vomiting that recurs in a cyclic pattern over months and 4) resolution of symptoms after stopping cannabis use. In addition diagnosis has supportive features of - 1) compulsive hot baths with symptom relief; 2) colicky abdominal pain; and 3) no evidence of gall bladder or pancreatic inflammation. Since the publication of these clinical guidelines, the syndrome is more easily recognized and treated. A series of 98 cases and review suggested modifications to original set of criteria that are listed below.
Sontineni et al. criteria for the diagnosis of “cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome”
Essential Cannabis use for years
Major Severe nausea and vomiting
Vomiting that recurs in a cyclic pattern over months
Resolution of symptoms after stopping cannabis use.
Supportive Compulsive hot baths with symptom relief
Colicky abdominal pain
No evidence of gall bladder or pancreatic inflammation
Modified criteria for the diagnosis of “cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome”
Essential Long-term cannabis use
Major Severe cyclic nausea and vomiting
Resolution with cannabis cessation
Relief of symptoms with hot showers or baths
Abdominal pain, epigastric or periumbilical
Weekly use of marijuana.
Supportive Age less than 50 y
Weight loss of >5 kg
Morning predominance of symptoms
Normal bowel habits
Negative laboratory, radiographic, and endoscopic test results
Various pathogenic mechanistic theories attempting to explain symptoms have been put forward. These theories fall into two themes: 1) dose dependent build up of cannabinoids and related effects of cannabinoid toxicity, and 2) the functionality of cannabinoid receptors in the brain and particularly in the hypothalamus (which regulates body temperature and the digestive system). But the mechanisms by which cannabis causes or controls nausea and the adverse consequences of long-term cannabis toxicity remain unknown and organic disease should not be ruled out as a possible cause.
The neurobiology of the compound has led to the discovery of an endogenous cannabinoid system. The therapeutic potential of cannabinoids has been recognized and these compounds are utilized as anti-emetics. Several studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effects of cannabinoids for nausea and vomiting in the advanced stages of illnesses such as cancer and AIDS.
^ Jump up to: a b Allen, J H; De Moore, GM; Heddle, R; Twartz, JC (2004). “Cannabinoid hyperemesis: Cyclical hyperemesis in association with chronic cannabis abuse”. Gut 53 (11): 156670. doi:10.1136/gut.2003.036350. PMC 1774264. PMID 15479672.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Sontineni, Siva-P; Chaudhary, S; Sontineni, V; Lanspa, SJ (2009). “Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome: Clinical diagnosis of an underrecognised manifestation of chronic cannabis abuse”. World Journal of Gastroenterology 15 (10): 12646. doi:10.3748/wjg.15.1264. PMC 2658859. PMID 19291829.
^ Jump up to: a b Simonetto, Douglas A.; Oxentenko, Amy S.; Herman, Margot L.; Szostek, Jason H. (2012). “Cannabinoid Hyperemesis: A Case Series of 98 Patients”. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 87 (2): 1149. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.10.005. PMID 22305024.
Jump up ^ Roche, E; Foster, PN (2005). “Cannabinoid hyperemesis: Not just a problem in Adelaide Hills”. Gut 54 (5): 731. PMC 1774504. PMID 15831930.
^ Jump up to: a b World health Organization, Cannabis - epidemiology.
Jump up ^ Byrne, A; Hallinan, R; Wodak, A (2006). “’Cannabis hyperemesis’ causation questioned”. Gut 55 (1): 132; author reply 132. PMC 1856368. PMID 16344581.
Jump up ^ “NCPIC.Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome”. Ncpic.org.au. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
Jump up ^ Davis, Mellar; Maida, Vincent; Daeninck, Paul; Pergolizzi, Joseph (2006). “The emerging role of cannabinoid neuromodulators in symptom management”. Supportive Care in Cancer 15 (1): 6371. doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0180-0. PMID 17139494.
http://www.ch.missouri.edu/fleisher/ (link redirected)
http://www.ch.missouri.edu/fleisher/2008EmpiricGuidelines2045EJF.pdf (link redirected)
http://www.ch.missouri.edu/fleisher/CVS%20in%20adults%209-6-03.pdf (link redirected)
http://www.ch.missouri.edu/fleisher/Opiates071908_1611.pdf (link redirected)
“...gravity will take you to them :...”
Haha! Yeah for sure, brother!!! The first step IS a doozy sometimes...
I like my feet firmly on the ground, a pack and a rifle on my back, a good sidearm on my hip, and the wind blowing through the trees.
And if it comes down to meeting up with some critter bent on making me into lunch, at least “Ol’ Painless” in .45-70 will be an equalizer...
(a yell of exhilaration, mainly used by surfers.)
Etymology: from Chief Thunderthud on the Howdy Doody Show
Are we here to get the federal government back into compliance with the Constitution or just arguing over how best to abuse it?
I remember “cowabunga” from “Snoopy” in the Charlie Brown cartoon strips...
Howdy Doody was right before I was born. But I’ve seen clips of that show on YouTube.
Kids were more innocent then... allowed to BE kids...
Oh we are clear alrigtht. I caught the /s. Didn’t take long though for the drug police to arrive as you mentioned.
“I won’t play the stupid tit for tat game with you, the subject was the War on Drugs.”
You get my point. All that Libertarian nonsense is great in theory but it doesn’t work in real life.
Get rid of Welfare and I’ll join you in the battle against the “War on Drugs”. Until then, I don’t want my tax dollars going to people who are just going to “sit around, get high and watch the tube”.
There was a medicinal side of the store, however silly that was.
I don’t have a problem with the prescription side of the argument if you think it is truly “medicine”. I don’t want Medicaid paying for wine and weed because someone thinks it is medicine.
Good luck with that.
“Not much of a pot shop is it?”
I'd rather have help, but thanks anyway.
Focus on Welfare, not Weed and we will jump on board.
Original intent isn't a multiple choice proposition.
When this country was founded pot was legal and several founding fathers had businesses involving pot. Pot didn’t become illegal until the 1920’s, so what you are claiming is simply paranoia. I thought only pot smokers were the paranoid type.
Michelle Malkin: Marxist supporter
--Freeper 'Above My Pay Grade'
I am not trying to avoid the issue. Malkin’s article glorifies marijuana use.
You pointed out that it was illegal until the 1920’s and I pointed out that America was a far different country back then. If you got stoned out of your mind and couldn’t support yourself, you basically starved or got killed trying to steal.
Now, if you can’t work because you are stoned on pot, you get to live off the hardworking taxpayers.
Also, there were actually Christian values in America back then so a majority of people would avoid idiotic, immoral behavior like pot smoking, whether it was legal or not.
Keep in mind that the rise of the marijuana culture and the decline of America occurred at the very, same time. The late 1960s.
Pot is a tool of the Marxist/Statist enemies of America to enslave the American people.