Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Economist: Transport causing ‘serious logistical challenge’ for shale boom
Fuel Fix ^ | March 25, 2014 | Collin Eaton

Posted on 03/26/2014 5:55:34 AM PDT by thackney

Despite major accidents in the past year, U.S. oil companies must keep using the nation’s railroads to move crude to markets while they build a much more extensive pipeline network, an energy economics professor said Tuesday.

Oil refineries on the East Coast have virtually no access to the light, sweet crude extracted in Texas’ surging oil fields because there are no pipelines to carry the oil there. It is generally too expensive to ship the crude from the Gulf Coast to buyers in the northeastern U.S. because of quirks in century-old laws, forcing refineries in New Jersey to buy oil from the Middle East and elsewhere, said Bernard Weinstein, associate director of the Maguire Energy Institute at Southern Methodist University.

“This is a serious logistical challenge,” Weinstein said in a panel opening the 10th annual Pipeline Opportunities Conference at the George R. Brown Convention Center in downtown Houston. “We need all the infrastructure that we can rally.”

Energy storage and transportation companies have made progress in their multibillion-dollar bid to build pipelines between U.S. shale plays that became active in the past five years and domestic markets. But they’re still decades away from fixing infrastructure gaps like the one between Texas oil fields and New Jersey refineries.

While the oil industry waits for the Obama Administration’s decision on the controversial northern segment of the Keystone XL pipeline, billionaire Harold Hamm’s $300 million Pony Express pipeline and other infrastructure projects are expected to connect gushing oil wells in North Dakota to the major U.S. pipeline hub in Cushing, Okla.

But more expensive and more dangerous crude-by-rail shipments are expected to remain the primary mode of transportation out of the Bakken Shale for at least another two years, Weinstein said.

That projection still stands even as crude-by-rail shipments draw heavy regulatory scrutiny after several major disasters involving exploding rail cars in the past year, including an accident in Quebec that killed 47 people when a crude-carrying train ran off its tracks and exploded.

“The fact is, if you look at the data over the last 20 years, it’s a lot safer and also a lot cheaper to move a oil through a pipeline than a rail car,” Weinstein said. “The spill rate for pipelines is less than half that for rail when you adjust for volume.”

Still, about 70 percent of the oil extracted from North Dakota’s major shale play moves to refineries by rail cars. And crude-by-rail shipments have grown from just 30 million barrels in the last half decade to more than 280 million barrels last year, he said, citing industry data.

“Rail is here to stay,” he said. “It’s going to continue to increase.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; oil; rail; shale
Photos and links to related stories at the source
1 posted on 03/26/2014 5:55:34 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney
Gee, if only we had a Pipeline.

That would make just a few things easier don't you think?

2 posted on 03/26/2014 6:10:43 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Another bottleneck: Gulf refineries are fitted for heavy Venezuelan, etc. crude, which is declining and has not been replaced by heavy crude from Alberta.


3 posted on 03/26/2014 6:10:51 AM PDT by Kennard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

Some are, some are not.

Some have made modification to accept more light, sweet from Eagle Ford.


4 posted on 03/26/2014 6:24:30 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

It’s like the Vanderbilt (rail) and Rockefeller (oil) days all over again.


5 posted on 03/26/2014 6:41:10 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Rockefeller lowered the cost of Oil by shipping oil by pipeline.


6 posted on 03/26/2014 7:37:32 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Oil refineries on the East Coast have virtually no access to the light, sweet crude extracted in Texas’ surging oil fields because there are no pipelines to carry the oil there.

And with the NIMBY Sierra Club Crowd their will never be one. Years ago their was a story in an East-Coast Newspaper about a Pipeline that goes from the CT shore ( if my memory is correct ) area to an Air Force Base North of their a state or 2 away, which I am reluctant to name. I don't know if it still exist, and if JP / Diesel type fuels still flow. But the article noted it's success after all these years and given the environment today ( this was 20 years ago ) it would never be built today...

7 posted on 03/26/2014 8:09:31 AM PDT by taildragger (The E-GOP won't know what hit them, The Party of Reagan is almost here, hang tight folks....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson