Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rutgers-Eagleton explains bad poll results on Christie and Booker races
Star Ledger ^ | March 26, 2014

Posted on 03/26/2014 1:58:30 PM PDT by SMGFan

The Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling at Rutgers University — whose polls on the 2013 race for governor and special election for U.S. Senate were far off the mark — today released a study it commissioned to find out why its surveys were so wrong.


According to the report, written by Langer Research Associates of New York, Rutgers-Eagleton flubbed by asking respondents a series of questions about the candidates before finally asking who they would vote for. In effect, that “primed” respondents to think more positively about candidates, and made them more likely to choose them when they finally arrived at the “head-to-head” question.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: chrischristie; newjersey; randsconcerntrolls; tpinos
So In other words . "oops"
1 posted on 03/26/2014 1:58:30 PM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Their final polls had Christie up by 36 points (he won by 22) and Booker up by 22 points (he won by 10).

2 posted on 03/26/2014 2:10:09 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson