Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul builds 50-state network, courts mainstream support for presidential bid
Washington Post ^ | 03/27/2014 | Robert Costa

Posted on 03/27/2014 7:01:42 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Sen. Rand Paul has become the first Republican to assemble a network in all 50 states as a precursor to a 2016 presidential run, the latest sign that he is looking to build a more mainstream coalition than the largely ad hoc one that backed his father’s unsuccessful campaigns.

Paul’s move, which comes nearly two years before the 2016 primaries, also signals an effort to win the confidence of skeptical members of the Republican establishment, many of whom doubt that his appeal will translate beyond the libertarian base that was attracted to Ron Paul, the former Texas congressman.

Rand Paul’s nationwide organization, which counts more than 200 people, includes new backers who have previously funded more traditional Republicans, along with longtime libertarian activists. Paul, of Kentucky, has also been courting Wall Street titans and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs who donated to the presidential campaigns of George W. Bush and Mitt Romney, attending elite conclaves in Utah and elsewhere along with other GOP hopefuls.

For the rest of this year, his national team’s chief duties will be to take the lead in their respective states in planning fundraisers and meet-ups and helping Paul’s Washington-based advisers get a sense of where support is solid and where it’s not. This is especially important in key early primary battlegrounds, such as Iowa and New Hampshire, and in areas rich in GOP donors, such as Dallas and Chicago.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2016gopprimary; libtardian; paul2016; paultards; potus; prochoice; randpaul; randpaul2016; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Draft Ron Paul!

We need Ron Paul and Rand Paul to both run. That way, we can hear about how much they differ on things, and why voting for Rand isn’t the same as voting for Ron.

Ron Paul has run in every election since Carter. No reason to stop now!


21 posted on 03/27/2014 8:22:52 AM PDT by TitansAFC (2016: 1. Palin, 2. Cruz, 3. Perry, 4. Walker, 5. Huckabee (to make the GOP-E see what WE go through))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Here in Indiana, I have a hard time getting interested in the election for President.

We don’t have a primary until May, so we never get much choice in choosing a candidate.

We aren’t really a swing state, so no activity happens here before then election.

We are totally at the whim of who other states choose and vote for.


22 posted on 03/27/2014 8:24:53 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Yep. Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, even Rick Perry. All good decent Patriotic Americans. I would vote for any of the three. We have to keep Jeb or Crispy out at all costs.


23 posted on 03/27/2014 8:59:55 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

Destroy the guy? Where in my post did I attack him? I simply said that
he is following the same strategy that Romney and McCain did. How did that strategy turn out? Learn to either read better or comprehend better.


24 posted on 03/27/2014 9:07:48 AM PDT by tennmountainman (Just Say No To Obamacare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I agree. We MUST have a fighter on the ticket. Someone not afraid to take on Hillary.


25 posted on 03/27/2014 9:11:38 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Disgruntled Dems and Independents I know would jump at the chance to vote for Paul. For sure he would shake up the political status quo. I would like to see Cruz as his running mate.
26 posted on 03/27/2014 9:36:30 AM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
Sounds like the same strategy Romney and McCain tried. Court the moderates and RINO’s and forget about conservatives. That strategy did not work out well for Romney and McCain.

In elections in which we couldn't win in 2008, and couldn't lose in 2012, Romney managed to be the first candidate in history to win the Independents "hugely", yet lose the election.

Rand's coming out against conservatism and the base, could duplicate Romney's failure.

27 posted on 03/27/2014 10:41:49 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; dforest; tennmountainman; bigbob; magna carta; VRWC For Truth; cripplecreek; kidd; ...

Wonder what position she'll occupy?

28 posted on 03/27/2014 1:18:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Looks like she will support Ron Paul. But he ain’t running, so she needs to get her facts straight.

Lots of lo info people out there.


29 posted on 03/27/2014 1:22:44 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t know about that, but there’s nothing stopping Ron Paul from running again! Why would he not?

Could you imagine he and Rand going at it in a debate, explaining their disagreements? They could eloquently explain to us their major policy differences!

Run, Ron Paul, run!!!!


30 posted on 03/27/2014 1:23:15 PM PDT by TitansAFC (2016: 1. Palin, 2. Cruz, 3. Perry, 4. Walker, 5. Huckabee (to make the GOP-E see what WE go through))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I doubt Ron Paul is running.


31 posted on 03/27/2014 1:25:51 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dforest

A) How do you know he’s not running? He’s run every election cycle since his boy was in short pants. (B) You don’t think she won’t transfer her “loyalty” over to junior? (C) Do you think that Jewish people and their allies aren’t aware of the father’s stance on everything Jewish, Israel and Zionism?


32 posted on 03/27/2014 1:28:25 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

So the people who supported GHWB 41 didn’t support GWB 43? Because I remember it a little differently...


33 posted on 03/27/2014 1:30:26 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have no idea who is going to run. Her sign says RON PAUL. Not Rand Paul. Frankly, I have not worried about who is running in 2016. Too early yet. I am not into the savaging of potentials at this time. I think my choice could be better than what some folks slavishly think is solid here or anywhere else.

Besides, I live in Indiana. i don’t get to choose the candidate and we are not a state that matters in a national election. We are not considered a swing state. Find someone else to hound.


34 posted on 03/27/2014 1:35:44 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t know, Alinsky tactics don’t work on me because I don’t care.


35 posted on 03/27/2014 1:36:09 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Is vicious truthing now an Alinsky tactic?


36 posted on 03/27/2014 1:41:16 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah sure whatever I don’t care.


37 posted on 03/27/2014 1:43:16 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think the sign says Ron not Rand. :-)


38 posted on 03/27/2014 1:48:24 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“There are plenty of things I disagree with him about but thar’s true of pretty much everybody”.
You are right. I sometimes even disagree with you. But then again I sometimes do agree with you. I hope that is clear.


39 posted on 03/27/2014 1:51:26 PM PDT by certrtwngnut (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: certrtwngnut

Rand Paul wouldn’t be my preferred candidate but if it comes down to him or the GOPe candidate, I’m voting for Paul.


40 posted on 03/27/2014 1:54:32 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson