Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules
Fox News ^ | 3/27/2014

Posted on 03/28/2014 2:55:17 AM PDT by markomalley

A federal appeals court on Thursday upheld Texas' tough abortion restrictions that have led to the closure of nearly 20 clinics around the state, saying the new rules don't jeopardize women's health.

A panel of judges at the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court judge who said the rules violate the U.S. Constitution and served no medical purpose. Despite the lower court's ruling, the appeals court already had allowed some rules to go into effect while it considered the case. The latest decision means more regulations will begin later this year, as scheduled, and sets the case up for a likely appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In its opinion, the appeals court said the law "on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: prolife

1 posted on 03/28/2014 2:55:17 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Victory for life.


2 posted on 03/28/2014 4:31:52 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Let’s see—they decided that new rules subjecting abortuaries to the same health and safety standards as actual medical facilities do not endanger women’s health.

I think we have an Einstein here...


3 posted on 03/28/2014 4:37:46 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The law, according to the court, does not create an “undue burden” for women seeking abortions.

That’s because when you read into the details of the much ballyhooed “20 week ban” in the bill, the “ban” nullifies itself if the mother believes it creates an ‘undue burden” for her.

The GOPe politicians in Texas passed this bill for emotional effect with Pro-Life voters and the Pro-Abortion Democrats like Wendy Davis have used it for emotional effect-campaign contributions as well.

The clinic regulations are having an effect, but consider this.

A longtime GOP politician in my home country used to tell me he “opposed abortion but supported birth control”. That’s because the major political contributors-rich people in the area were Planned Parenthood supporters.

The new clinic regs in Texas shut down the small time operators who are back alley abortionists with a sign out front while allowing the well financed and supported Planned Parenthood operations to stay in business.

Its a case of GOPe politicians supporting a large business interest over smaller ones.


4 posted on 03/28/2014 4:43:19 AM PDT by Nextrush (AFFORDABLE CARE ACT=HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY BAILOUT ACT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson