Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators accuse GM of trying to cover up defective switch tied to 13 deaths
Foxnews.com ^ | April 2, 2014 | AP release

Posted on 04/02/2014 3:35:15 PM PDT by alloysteel

Members of a Senate subcommittee accused General Motors of trying to cover up problems with an ignition switch that is now tied to 13 deaths, and pressed CEO Mary Barra to commit to punishing anyone involved.

Panel members also told Barra that GM should tell owners to stop driving all the 2.6 million cars being recalled for the faulty switch until they are repaired. GM is currently telling owners the cars, mainly Chevrolet Cobalts and Saturn Ions, are fine to drive as long as nothing is placed on the key chain.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: California; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: barbaraboxer; california; defectrecall; generalmotors; governmentmotors; henrywaxman; marrybarras; michigan; obamamotors; senatehearing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Interesting is the comment by Sen. Barbara Boxer concerning whether CEO Mary Barra should have been aware of the defect much sooner than she claims to be. "You don't know anything about anything," said Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. "If this is the new GM leadership, it's pretty lacking." Odd she should say that.....
1 posted on 04/02/2014 3:35:15 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

I doubt I could care less what happen to Government Motors.

Anything owned and run by the anti-American UAW needs to fall apart.

And it will.


2 posted on 04/02/2014 3:38:26 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
It still is Ggovernment Motors owned by the United States Federal Government - so what the heck are they fussing about?
3 posted on 04/02/2014 3:40:12 PM PDT by Slyfox (When Jesus sees a momma holding her little baby, it reminds him of his own momma.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

It’s defective people, not switches!

A friend of mine that had a tune up and dyno shop over 30 years ago was constantly having the problem when switches on the column came out.

The problem was people having a whole lot of keys on the ring/chain dangling below the ignition which was messing up the switches.

That was all makes nor just GM.

Congress can go stick their investigation up their ass!!!


4 posted on 04/02/2014 3:41:09 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Hey, wasn’t Obama CEO of Government Motors? Impeach him!


5 posted on 04/02/2014 3:41:11 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Henry Waxman doesn’t know how to deal with a real reporter about this issue.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3140093/posts


6 posted on 04/02/2014 3:45:46 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

They’ve been building cars since when, 1889?

Why is it they keep having to recall cars for faulty components they should have perfected by about 1903?


7 posted on 04/02/2014 3:46:28 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Not to absolve GM of blame but how is this causing people to crash?


8 posted on 04/02/2014 3:55:00 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

“The problem was people having a whole lot of keys on the ring/chain dangling below the ignition which was messing up the switches.”

Obviously, this is a bad policy and a safety hazard for the driver EVEN WITH switches that work perfectly.

What I find highly disturbing about what happened, is that GM changed the part without changing the part number. In the manufacturing environments I’ve worked in, that behavior would get you fired very quickly, up to the managers who permitted/ignored it.

The reason is, manufacturing must have traceability for liability and safety agency reasons. Suppose that you have a recall of an electrical, UL-approved product for a safety reason. What would you rather do - recall and eat the expense of units between serial number 000234 and 003456, or every single product of that type you ever made, up to serial number 856,456?


9 posted on 04/02/2014 3:56:16 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

It is not like it is floor mats or something. /s


10 posted on 04/02/2014 3:58:27 PM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Were the switches made in China?


11 posted on 04/02/2014 3:59:20 PM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

“Why is it they keep having to recall cars for faulty components they should have perfected by about 1903?”

The government’s fingerprints are on this. modern cars have to have their steering locked if the key is removed. The cheapest way to do this is to put the lock on the steering column itself. On my older Mercedes, the key/lock is on the dash, and this type of problem is flat impossible mechanically.


12 posted on 04/02/2014 4:00:08 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

There shouldn’t be a recall. it’s defect people not defective switches!

I have no sympathy for stupid people getting killed, the more the better!


13 posted on 04/02/2014 4:11:54 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

Plenty of comments about the growing danger of increased safety equipment in this thread from yesterday.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3139629/posts

In this GM case, from what I’ve read, steering lock isn’t even part of the problem. As far as I can tell, this causes a loss of power and the airbags don’t deploy. It doesn’t explain how it causes people to crash.


14 posted on 04/02/2014 4:16:14 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

“I have no sympathy for stupid people getting killed, the more the better!”

You and I probably do or have earned a living from the vagaries of “stupid people”. Dead stupid people are terrible customers.

The bottom line is, that mechanism/switch is supposed to withstand repeated hammer blows to significant government standards. So, it can’t survive 6 ounces of keys??? You think that to be an acceptable design?


15 posted on 04/02/2014 4:18:17 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“In this GM case, from what I’ve read, steering lock isn’t even part of the problem. As far as I can tell, this causes a loss of power the airbags don’t deploy. It doesn’t explain how it causes people to crash.”

The steering column MAY lock. Also, many cars have power steering and/or brakes. Newer cars can have electric power steering. A sudden increase in steering effort might make a big difference in accident avoidance capability.


16 posted on 04/02/2014 4:21:35 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

“You think that to be an acceptable design?”

absolutely!!


17 posted on 04/02/2014 4:23:56 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I was surprised that the airbags don’t deploy if the engine somehow is shut off. I thought they deployed on impact. That sounds like something drivers should know.


18 posted on 04/02/2014 4:25:28 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: grania

Back when I worked for a company that made interior Cadillac door skins we had some 60,000 doors come back to replace studs inside the doors.

Seems that the studs were too long and snagged the air bags when they deployed.


19 posted on 04/02/2014 4:31:31 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

GM saved .57 cents per ignition device. Email found stated that was too costly. They could have spent $100 million several years ago in a recall but decided against that. The cost is at least $1.5 billion now and many more people have been killed or injured.

All for .57 cents.
The people who decided this no doubt got a nice bonus check for money saved....


20 posted on 04/02/2014 4:31:45 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson