Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia could achieve Ukraine incursion in 3-5 days - NATO general
Reuters ^ | Wed Apr 2, 2014 9:20pm BST | Adrian Croft

Posted on 04/02/2014 5:00:31 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com

"> (Reuters) - Russia has massed all the forces it needs on Ukraine's border if it were to decide to carry out an "incursion" into the country, and it could achieve its objective in three to five days, NATO's top military commander said on Wednesday. Calling the situation "incredibly concerning", NATO's supreme allied commander in Europe, U.S. Air Force General Philip Breedlove, said NATO had spotted signs of movement by a very small part of the Russian force overnight but had no indication that this was part of a withdrawal to barracks.

(Excerpt) Read more at uk.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: ukraine
(Article Con't) Russia's seizure and annexation of Ukraine's Crimea region has caused the deepest crisis in East-West relations since the Cold War, leading the United States and Europe to impose sanctions on Moscow. They have said they will strengthen these if Russia moves beyond Crimea into eastern Ukraine. NATO military chiefs are concerned that the Russian force on the Ukrainian border, which they estimate stands at 40,000 soldiers, could pose a threat to eastern and southern Ukraine. "This is a very large and very capable and very ready force," Breedlove said in an interview with Reuters and The Wall Street Journal. The Russian force has aircraft and helicopter support as well as field hospitals and electronic warfare capabilities - "the entire suite that would be required to successfully have an incursion into Ukraine, should the decision be made," Breedlove said. "We think it is ready to go and we think it could accomplish its objectives in between three and five days if directed to make the actions." Russia has said it has no intention of invading its neighbour, although since the toppling of Moscow-backed Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich in February it has asserted a right to intervene to protect ethnic Russians if necessary. Further Russian intervention in Ukraine would be an "historic mistake" that would deepen Moscow's international isolation, NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said on Wednesday. POSSIBLE AIMS Breedlove said Russia could have several potential objectives. These included: an incursion into southern Ukraine to establish a land corridor to Crimea; pushing beyond Crimea to Ukraine's Black Sea port of Odessa; or even threatening to connect to Transdniestria, the mainly Russian-speaking, separatist region of Moldova that lies to the west of Ukraine. Russia also has forces to the north and northeast of Ukraine that could enter the east of the former Soviet republic if Moscow ordered them to do so, Breedlove said. He said NATO planned no military response to events in Ukraine, which is not a member of the alliance: "We really need to resolve this in a peaceful manner because a military conflict would be very costly to Europe and to the nations involved." But events in Ukraine, particularly Russia's use of a snap exercise to ready a military force to intervene in Crimea, are already leading to a deep rethink of strategy by NATO, a military alliance of 28 nations that has been the core of European defence for more than 60 years. "We are going to have to look at how our alliance now is prepared for a different paradigm, a different rule set... We will need to rethink our force posture, our force positioning, our force provisioning, readiness, etc," Breedlove said. NATO foreign ministers meeting in Brussels this week suspended all practical cooperation with Russia in protest at its actions in Crimea and asked military commanders to draw up plans to reinforce NATO members in eastern Europe that are fearful of a threat from Russia. Breedlove said the ministers had asked him to draft by April 15 a package of measures that would include reinforcements by land, air and sea. He said he would offer a range of options and recommend a plan. "We will work on air, land and sea 'reassurances' and we will look to position those 'reassurances' across the breadth of our exposure: north, centre, and south," he said. The United States deployed a warship to the Black Sea last month for exercises with allies. It also increased the number of U.S. aircraft in regular NATO air patrols over the Baltics and beefed up a previously planned training exercise with the Polish air force. A number of other NATO allies have also offered extra planes and ships to reinforce eastern European countries. MORE EXERCISES Breedlove said the initial U.S. moves with "aircraft in the north, aircraft in the centre and a ship in the south" could serve as a model for what NATO would do next, except other NATO allies would also be involved in future reinforcements. He would not say how long the reinforcements would stay in central and eastern Europe but said it would not be short-term, although deployments would be periodically reviewed. NATO may bring forward some military exercises or expand others, he said. NATO is also looking at the readiness of its rapid reaction force, the NATO Response Force, which includes land, air, sea and special operations forces, and could consider shortening the time it takes for the force to respond, he said. Plans for NATO and Russia to cooperate in providing a naval escort for a U.S. ship that will destroy Syria's deadliest chemical weapons were scrapped due to the Crimea crisis. But Breedlove said NATO members had made plenty of offers of ships to escort the U.S. cargo ship Cape Ray and he hoped this task would become an alliance mission. The Ukraine crisis has reopened debate within NATO about whether its members need to spend more on defence. Many of them have cut military budgets in response to the financial crisis, with only a handful reaching NATO's target of spending 2 percent of economic output on defence. Breedlove said countries needed to get to 2 percent, but this was not a 'magic' figure; the point was to spend it "to create the kind of requirements and capabilities that we need as a NATO team".
1 posted on 04/02/2014 5:00:31 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Yikes,can you format that a little better? Hard to read.

.


2 posted on 04/02/2014 5:03:21 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Entire article follows: (Reuters) - Russia has massed all the forces it needs on Ukraine’s border if it were to decide to carry out an “incursion” into the country, and it could achieve its objective in three to five days, NATO’s top military commander said on Wednesday.

Calling the situation “incredibly concerning”, NATO’s supreme allied commander in Europe, U.S. Air Force General Philip Breedlove, said NATO had spotted signs of movement by a very small part of the Russian force overnight but had no indication that this was part of a withdrawal to barracks.

Russia’s seizure and annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region has caused the deepest crisis in East-West relations since the Cold War, leading the United States and Europe to impose sanctions on Moscow. They have said they will strengthen these if Russia moves beyond Crimea into eastern Ukraine.

NATO military chiefs are concerned that the Russian force on the Ukrainian border, which they estimate stands at 40,000 soldiers, could pose a threat to eastern and southern Ukraine.

“This is a very large and very capable and very ready force,” Breedlove said in an interview with Reuters and The Wall Street Journal.

The Russian force has aircraft and helicopter support as well as field hospitals and electronic warfare capabilities - “the entire suite that would be required to successfully have an incursion into Ukraine, should the decision be made,” Breedlove said.

“We think it is ready to go and we think it could accomplish its objectives in between three and five days if directed to make the actions.”

Russia has said it has no intention of invading its neighbour, although since the toppling of Moscow-backed Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich in February it has asserted a right to intervene to protect ethnic Russians if necessary.

Further Russian intervention in Ukraine would be an “historic mistake” that would deepen Moscow’s international isolation, NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said on Wednesday.

POSSIBLE AIMS

Breedlove said Russia could have several potential objectives. These included: an incursion into southern Ukraine to establish a land corridor to Crimea; pushing beyond Crimea to Ukraine’s Black Sea port of Odessa; or even threatening to connect to Transdniestria, the mainly Russian-speaking, separatist region of Moldova that lies to the west of Ukraine.

Russia also has forces to the north and northeast of Ukraine that could enter the east of the former Soviet republic if Moscow ordered them to do so, Breedlove said.

He said NATO planned no military response to events in Ukraine, which is not a member of the alliance: “We really need to resolve this in a peaceful manner because a military conflict would be very costly to Europe and to the nations involved.”

But events in Ukraine, particularly Russia’s use of a snap exercise to ready a military force to intervene in Crimea, are already leading to a deep rethink of strategy by NATO, a military alliance of 28 nations that has been the core of European defence for more than 60 years.

“We are going to have to look at how our alliance now is prepared for a different paradigm, a different rule set... We will need to rethink our force posture, our force positioning, our force provisioning, readiness, etc,” Breedlove said.

NATO foreign ministers meeting in Brussels this week suspended all practical cooperation with Russia in protest at its actions in Crimea and asked military commanders to draw up plans to reinforce NATO members in eastern Europe that are fearful of a threat from Russia.

Breedlove said the ministers had asked him to draft by April 15 a package of measures that would include reinforcements by land, air and sea. He said he would offer a range of options and recommend a plan.

“We will work on air, land and sea ‘reassurances’ and we will look to position those ‘reassurances’ across the breadth of our exposure: north, centre, and south,” he said.

The United States deployed a warship to the Black Sea last month for exercises with allies. It also increased the number of U.S. aircraft in regular NATO air patrols over the Baltics and beefed up a previously planned training exercise with the Polish air force.

A number of other NATO allies have also offered extra planes and ships to reinforce eastern European countries.

MORE EXERCISES

Breedlove said the initial U.S. moves with “aircraft in the north, aircraft in the centre and a ship in the south” could serve as a model for what NATO would do next, except other NATO allies would also be involved in future reinforcements.

He would not say how long the reinforcements would stay in central and eastern Europe but said it would not be short-term, although deployments would be periodically reviewed.

NATO may bring forward some military exercises or expand others, he said.

NATO is also looking at the readiness of its rapid reaction force, the NATO Response Force, which includes land, air, sea and special operations forces, and could consider shortening the time it takes for the force to respond, he said.

Plans for NATO and Russia to cooperate in providing a naval escort for a U.S. ship that will destroy Syria’s deadliest chemical weapons were scrapped due to the Crimea crisis.

But Breedlove said NATO members had made plenty of offers of ships to escort the U.S. cargo ship Cape Ray and he hoped this task would become an alliance mission.

The Ukraine crisis has reopened debate within NATO about whether its members need to spend more on defence.

Many of them have cut military budgets in response to the financial crisis, with only a handful reaching NATO’s target of spending 2 percent of economic output on defence.

Breedlove said countries needed to get to 2 percent, but this was not a ‘magic’ figure; the point was to spend it “to create the kind of requirements and capabilities that we need as a NATO team”.


3 posted on 04/02/2014 5:39:40 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

“Plans for NATO and Russia to cooperate in providing a naval escort for a U.S. ship that will destroy Syria’s deadliest chemical weapons were scrapped due to the Crimea crisis.”

Scary stuff-—I wasn’t even aware of the Syria mission.

.


4 posted on 04/02/2014 5:48:44 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

“shelter in place”

Obama’s foreign policy message to Poland, Taiwan, South Korea ... and Benghazi.


5 posted on 04/02/2014 5:52:32 PM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
I call bull crap on this whole story! Tell you can prove to me they all have Harry Potter cape so you can't see them it's all B.S. This will be another WMD story or a ship has been shot at story. People wake the F--- up and smell the coffee. This is D.C.s only way to get the GDP up so we don't have a collapse. War is good for business.
6 posted on 04/02/2014 6:09:33 PM PDT by lostboy61 (Lock and Load and stand your ground!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com; Mears; Army Air Corps; 2ndDivisionVet
It will take a little more than Seven Days to Reach the Rhine River today.

But they would get there eventually.

7 posted on 04/02/2014 6:09:33 PM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

God,that map——reminds me of the fear of Communism that we all had in the 50s.

.


8 posted on 04/02/2014 6:21:04 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mears
That is Because it is the same fear, or more precisely, from 1978: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Days_to_the_River_Rhine
9 posted on 04/02/2014 6:28:13 PM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

“But they would get there eventually”

Why do you think they would want to?

How about we give the US war machine a rest for a few generations, and concentrate on real security threats to our homeland and economy: debt, cyber, EMPs, WMD, illegal immigrants, failed dollar...?


10 posted on 04/02/2014 6:45:05 PM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Yep, whenever I want to see what’s going on in Russia, I read the lying, anti-semitc commie bastards at Reuters.


11 posted on 04/02/2014 7:48:14 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/02/world/europe/ukraine-crisis/
Brussels, Belgium (CNN) — NATO’s military chief warned Wednesday that Russian troops could begin moving on Ukraine within 12 hours of being given an order, amid fears that Moscow could seek to invade its eastern region.

excerpt: Marine deployment

Within the next few days, 175 U.S. Marines from Camp Lejeune in North Carolina will begin deploying to Romania as part of an effort to beef up a Marine Corps presence in Europe for dealing with contingencies. The deployment to Romania was long planned, Pentagon spokesman Colonel Steve Warren said.

The Marines will become additional forces assigned to a so-called Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force headquartered in Moron, Spain. But additional forces in Romania will beef up the U.S. military presence in the region as tensions have risen over the Russian troop buildup along Ukraine’s border.

Romania has agreed to allow up to 600 U.S. forces on its soil at any one time. There are an additional 300 Marines in Romania as part of a longstanding bilateral training program.

The Pentagon is also considering additional moves in Eastern Europe to beef up military deployment exercises. A Navy warship is expected to enter the Black Sea in the coming days for another round of port visits and exercises as part of the effort, Warren said.”


12 posted on 04/02/2014 7:54:11 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson