Posted on 04/02/2014 5:25:42 PM PDT by Star Traveler
Clinton, actually.
Prolly MSNBC. CNN is stuck on the Hindenburg.
CNN has to Lead with OBAMA NEWS.....
I worked a civilian at an AFB and had to park on the other side of the freeway and then cross the bridge on foot and walk through some kind of checkpoint to show ID before continuing on to work.
I had a bumper sticker that did allow me onto other bases but now question why.
No freaks allowed anywhere near our bottoms.
not the kind of “crazy ivan” our armed forces are used to or on the lookout for. /navy sub
they need to ban guns on the base... if they’d of put a big sign up this wouldn’t have happened.
also, whoever said, "where are we recruiting these people from?"!!
Connected or not, I wonder what the "mitigating circumstances" will be for this one?
"Ivan Lopez" is a rather schizophrenic-sounding name, too...sounds like an alias, a nom de plume, or perhaps a nom de guerre. IOW, the perfect US recruit. /s
3 dead and multiple injured?
Soldier dispute? The numbers sound more like a gang shooting... or some nut bar.
No sale...Not buying simple soldier dispute.
You mean like Ivan "Pudge" Rodriquez, famous baseball catcher?
(Good one! But you have to admit, it's an unusual juxtapostion of rather "ethnic" names, in both cases. Baseball players do seem to come up with the most unusual combinations of given names, nicknames, and surnames...)
Not to make frivolous comments about a terrible incident. Just an unusual name, probably signifying nothing.
Isn’t every base in the US a Gun Free Zone?
AFAIK, yes-—and how dumb is that!
And Al-Qaeda observes and take notes as these events take place.
There a lots of guns locked up in the arms rooms on Fort Hood. Even if you could get them issued out in time to respond to a shooting, there is not any ammo available.
Fort Hood is huge, there are around 45,000 soldiers stationed there. That would take a pretty large parking lot.
I’m just saying why not allow military personnel to carry side arms on them? And if for some reason why not at least increase the MPs with arms around the base after 2000?
After 2009 that is.
The Army has quite an elaborate accountability hassle associated with weapons and ammo. It could be done, but it would be a pain in the neck for all involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.