Posted on 04/04/2014 4:14:39 AM PDT by markomalley
Within the context of keeping the Syrian jihad alive, it seems there is no end to the attempts of some Islamic clerics to legitimize otherwise forbidden behavior in order to gratify the sexual urges of the jihadis and keep them fighting Syrian president Bashar Assad.
First, there was the now infamous “sex-jihad” fatwa, which holds that any Muslim woman who willingly allows her body to be used by the sexually-deprived jihadis becomes herself a jihadi, if not a “martyr,” deserving of all the honor and rewards associated with those titles. (Much has been written about the sex jihad, including videotaped testimonials—and how one teenage girl, after copulating with countless jihadis, got pregnant and contracted aids—even as pro-Syrian war Western entities like Foreign Policy try to deny it.)
Another fatwa permitted the jihadis in Syria to enslave and rape any non-Sunni women—including Alawites (Assad’s sect), Christians, Druze, and all Shia—in the context of their status as melk al-yamin or “right hand possessions,” per Koran 4:3 (a verse that permits the enslavement and sexual use of conquered “infidel” women).
Now, the same Islamic cleric who issued this last “rape fatwa” has issued another fatwa urging destitute women in war torn Syria to become the “right hand possessions” of any man willing to support them—basically, to sell themselves into sex-slavery.
In a video that appeared in December 2013, Jordanian Sheikh Yassin al-Ajlawni, who says he lived in Syria for 17 years, asserted that “the needy, disenfranchised Syrian woman is permitted to ask the Muslim man who is capable of supporting her, to enter into a “right hand possession” contract with him, whereby she becomes his right hand possession.”
Ajlawni’s logic is that, because Syria is in a state of war, and the numbers of men are dropping, needy and displaced women are permitted to seek out support by selling themselves into concubinage.
In the Muslim sheikh’s own words:
We hereby give fatwa permitting the Syrian woman who desires to be married to a Muslim man, via a “right hand possession” contract—whereby he becomes her master and she becomes his slave—that all this contract needs is for the woman be clean of her menstruation period, and that this contract be registered with the sheikhs or other authorities, either in a Sharia or civil court… Afterwards, once the woman says, “I give you possession over myself,” via contract of “right hand possession,” this woman becomes his loyal servant, and he her lord; she becomes a slave and concubine to him, and he must support her according to a previously agreed upon monetary fee … thus they become governed by the rulings of “right hand possession,” and there is no problem with this, Allah willing.
To bolster his fatwa, al-Ajlawni referred to a few hadiths (recorded words and teachings of Islam’s prophet Muhammad), including: “One of the signs of the [final] hour is that knowledge will decrease, ignorance will increase, adultery will appear, women will grow in numbers, while men will grow less, so that fifty women will be worth one [man].”
Al-Ajlawni also cited a hadith from the canonical Sahih Bukhari, which has the prophet saying: “whenever fitna [sedition from Islam] becomes widespread, Allah distinguishes his followers, so that 50 women follow one man, saying, ‘Oh Abdullah [“slave of Allah”], take care of me,’” adding that in the same narrative the woman says, “O Abdullah, have sex with me.”
In closing, the sheikh said: “We call on the ulema of Syria to adopt this [fatwa], for it is the only legitimate way to guarantee that displaced Syrian women who have no one to rely on but Allah are not physically or sexually exploited or beaten in ways that contradict Sharia. All prayers and blessings upon our prophet.”
While one may rationalize such fatwas away in the context of the chaotic situation in Syria, the fact is, the same fatwa, the same logic, was earlier issued in Egypt, soon after Muhammad Morsi became president in 2012. Then, Egypt’s first “sex slave” marriage took place, when a woman declared before her future master-spouse, “I enslave myself to you,” before they kissed to an applauding crowd.
The justification for “right hand possession” marriages in Egypt was not displaced and destitute women, but rather young, sexually-frustrated men not able to afford wives, and women who wish to dress promiscuously—since the rules governing female “right hand possessions” forbid them from wearing the hijab (as sex-slaves, they are required to be partially naked, differentiating them from Muslim women, as explained by this Kuwaiti woman).
It’s not a religion. Not even close.
But then again, this pigsh*t belief system is based on the demented ramblings of a proud pedophile “prophet” who repeatedly raped at least one 9 year old girl.
And the feminists say, hear me roar...
Crickets.
It appears that the men of the west are needed to step up.
And the feminists say, hear me roar...
Crickets.
It appears that the men of the west are needed to step up.
And the feminists say, hear me roar...
Crickets.
It appears that the men of the west are needed to step up.
EXEMPT Clinton and the EXEMPT Democrats AGREE with this,
and in return EXEMPT Obama and the EXEMPT Congress
will send more US Taxpayer-paid weapons to al Qaeda.
These people are NAZIs reborn. And that idiot in the White House continues to pander to them along with the entire liberal establishment.
Why do their young not rebel? Why do they continue to bow down 5x a day & subject their children to this evil? Why do they not run from a “religion” that condones such disgusting behavior? I will never understand how anyone can belong to this “religion.”
> Why do their young not rebel? Why do they continue to bow
> down 5x a day & subject their children to this evil? Why do
> they not run from a “religion” that condones such
> disgusting behavior? I will never understand how anyone can
> belong to this “religion.”
Because where ever this cult prevails, those who are born into it will be killed in the most savage manner if they ever dare to leave the cult.
The same goes for proselytes.
Once you’re in, you’re in for for the remainder of your life.
Worse than the bloody mafia.
True. But when you come to America, you can free yourself of this evil. When I see women in burqas at the mall, it makes me want to scream! It’s not a religion, it’s just pure evil.
Mohammed should be the head of NAMBLA!
One is reminded of this little bit of controversy -
“A Modest Proposal: For Preventing The Children of Poor People in Ireland From Being A Burden to Their Parents or Country, and For Making Them Beneficial to The Public
By Jonathan Swift (1729)”
Only, when Muslims say something like this, it is not satire, but delivered in dead serious intent. They really want the “poor people” to prostitute themselves. Otherwise the “poor” are just beggars on the street, only fit to be kicked aside or run over by motor vehicles.
If Soylent Green really is part of the future, it will arrive on the wings of Islamic deliverance.
Think of the savings in agricultural development alone. No need to irrigate large tracts of desert, the food supply has minimal transportation costs to the point of processing, and thus to the point of consumption.
Yes, you sex perverts terrorists, I'm not politically correct, especially when it comes to your F up so-called religion. You so called 'Religion of Peace'. How is beheadings peaceful? How is sex slavery peaceful?
The only thing different between you and NAMBLA is you are worldwide
> But when you come to America, you can free yourself of this evil.
Tell that to the two sisters killed by their own MoHamHead father in Texas. Oh, right, you can’t, because they’re dead.
http://www.humanevents.com/2008/01/08/honor-killing-in-texas/
Or, maybe Mrs. Aisihah Hassan, beheaded by her MoHamHead husband ...
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/16/buffalo.beheading/
There are lots more, I’m sure, but you get the idea.
When I see those women in burqas, I would love to ask when they see a ‘Victoria’s Secret’, if they would love to wear that, or would they want them to sell burqas.
It’s all about the anatomy.
Why is scratching their itch so freaking urgent?
They do wear Vickie’s Secret under the stupid burqua. When I see them, sometimes I say: ‘You don’t have to wear that in America.”
They look at me with daggers
Well, he is just describing the exact rules of the society that will remain after Western Civilization is destroyed. So choose wisely, feminists...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.