Posted on 04/04/2014 9:28:28 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey
The names of the six-member jury panel that acquitted George Zimmerman in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin have been made public for the first time, after a new court order, records show.
Circuit Judge Debra Nelson, who had previously ordered the jurors' identifying information be kept confidential, granted access to the names in a ruling March 21.
(Excerpt) Read more at touch.orlandosentinel.com ...
I hope they are arming up.
I would think that’s good enough reason for legal recourse right there against the party making those names public.
That bi itch of a judge wants revenge. Disgusting.
There will be trouble when the first juror is harassed in a dangerous way (death threats, assaulted, etc.).
Agreed!!!
However, they ARE drawn from a pool of slime somewhere near the courthouse................
who opposed the media?
*******
Good question but not sure there was a hearing. Thus no court action,
just a release by the judge.
From the article:
.... In a letter, Sentinel attorneys asked Nelson for a specific ruling on how long
she planned to maintain the jurors’ anonymity, noting it was already “well past the
six month ‘cooling off’ period requested by the defense.” ....
if it bleeds it leads...and sadly this may well lead to a LOT of bleeding
No kidding. America is looking more and more like the Soviet Union with each passing day. Intimidation, thought-crimes, fear.
This judge is all but soliciting the murder of the jurors.
From the article:
...Attempts to reach the jurors by phone and in-person
Thursday were unsuccessful....
Just days after Holder signaled that he plans to have Zimmerman tried again...probably trying to calculate when the trial will have maximum political impact on the November elections.
In a court of law, not at their front door.
And anyway, the jury is not the accuser.
I missed it. Where did he do that?
haha INDEED! the Nifong Swamp!
I am awaiting Would Be Pope..Revrant Al Sharpton’s proclamations of The RITENESS...the RITENSESS I say ..of this Brave Axeshun by that wite judge...
That was a very dumb comment.
The accused in the case had zero desire to see the names of the jurors made public.
This makes your comment doubly foolish.
Even if the accused were to exercise his right to discover the identities of the jurors so his attorneys could investigate them for bias on appeal, there would be no need to make their names public.
This makes your comment trebly mindless.
Oh my I hadnt given that Political Propganda Factor any thought ..yet
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.