Posted on 04/04/2014 12:55:44 PM PDT by smoothsailing
Morrell threw his analysts under the bus, saying it was them that wrote the report based on the evidence they had.
Then he tried to rehabillitate them by saying they didn’t have the reports from multiple CIA assets on the ground in Bengazi, including the Station Chief.
Well, the qustion becomes, “Why didn’t they have that information, Mr. Morrell? Because you were in direct contact with the folks on the ground and they told you there was no demonstration.
Why did you withhold that information from the analysts at Langley? Analysis is only as good as the information it is based on. They would certainly have weighted their analysis in favor of CIA employees and diplomatic personnel in Tripoli and Benghazi instead of on ‘reports from African newspapers.”
You knew there was no demonstration, why didn’t you tell the analysts under your command?.
I’m sorry that no Congressman asked that question.
I still do not understand why Hillary Clinton was allowed to skip swearing in when she testified before Congress.
(Of course, what does swearing to tell the truth mean to a Clinton?)
God bless those ladies.
LOL
Lois Lerner ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.