Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gripen flies with passive targeting sensor
Flight International ^ | 04/04/2014 | CRAIG HOYLE

Posted on 04/04/2014 7:33:25 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Saab has successfully test flown a key passive detection capability for its in-development Gripen E fighter, using dedicated test aircraft 39-7.

Developed by Selex ES’s Airborne & Space Systems division, the Skyward-G infrared search and track (IRST) sensor will give the combat aircraft a long-range means of detecting and identifying potential airborne threats, without the need to first switch on its active electronically scanned array radar. Secondary applications include the ability to act as a navigation and landing aid during darkness.

“The first flight in the Gripen E test aircraft with IRST has been performed with very good results,” says Hans Einerth, wing commander flying at Saab’s Linköping production and test site in Sweden. “Multiple targets were detected, tracked and identified, and the system works perfectly.”

Saab

Skyward-G comprises a sensor head unit installed in front of the fighter’s cockpit, and an associated processor unit box, which is stowed in the nose avionics bay. The entire system weighs less than 40kg (88lb), says Selex.

“The [IRST] integration and development work is progressing according to schedule,” says Saab. The company is producing three dedicated E-model test aircraft, with its current 39-7 asset being a modified D-model Gripen. The new-generation version should enter use in 2018, with operators expected to include Sweden, plus export customers Brazil and Switzerland; both have yet to finalise planned orders.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; gripen; irst; saab

Mounted ahead of the windscreen, the Skyward-G IRST unit for the Gripen E made its first flight on the Gripen NG technology demonstrator on 31 March. (Saab)

1 posted on 04/04/2014 7:33:25 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It’s a nice-looking aircraft, but there doesn’t seem to be much room for fuel tanks ....


2 posted on 04/04/2014 7:46:51 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

In stark contrast to my ‘88 Saab 9000, which had electrical problems and a penchant for overheating.

It’s interesting to note the latest European fighters are delta-winged models.


3 posted on 04/04/2014 7:49:26 PM PDT by 12Gauge687
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

what’s that zit in front of the cockpit for?


4 posted on 04/04/2014 7:58:40 PM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

did u read the article?


5 posted on 04/04/2014 8:08:40 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

of course not!


6 posted on 04/04/2014 8:12:47 PM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I almost said that was the first Saab I had ever seen without canards. Then I looked closer.


7 posted on 04/04/2014 8:16:28 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8: verses 38 and 39. "For I am persuaded".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
naaa, this is the first SAAB without nards... 8^)

8 posted on 04/04/2014 8:39:54 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

IIRC, the old F-106 had an IR passive tracking/targeting sensor too, same with the MiG-29 and in the case of the F-106 it was way back in 1960 or so.


9 posted on 04/04/2014 9:19:55 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Mom I miss you! (8-20-1938 to 11-18-2013) Cancer sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

You are right. At an airshow once I asked a F-106 what was the little blister mounted in front of the canopy. He said it was a liquid nitrogen. The extreme low temperature of the liquid nitrogen was used to detect the heat exhaust of another aircraft. Advantage was that it was passive, did not emit any trackable emissions and could not be jammed. Disadvantage was that it could only give a rough bearing and no distance information.


10 posted on 04/05/2014 6:37:18 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ops33

The liquid nitrogen was used to cool the sensor.


11 posted on 04/08/2014 4:08:38 AM PDT by MHalblaub ("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MHalblaub

Thanks, I thought the liquid nitrogen itself was the sensor.


12 posted on 04/08/2014 5:45:25 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

An early batch of F-14A had IRST as well. It was dropped, then the Television Camera Set (TCS) added to most As and Bs. The F-14D had BOTH TCS and IRST.

Some foreign F-15Es have IRST, but the USAF hasn’t adopted it yet, except for some Aggressor F-16s to simulate MiG-29s etc. The Navy’s playing around with a centerline fuel tank equipped IRST for the F/A-18E/F and EA-18G fleet.


13 posted on 04/08/2014 5:53:48 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson