Key point: The denial leaves standing a decision by the state's highest court that went against the photo studio
posted on 04/07/2014 6:59:34 AM PDT
So basically if they ask the photographer to take a close up of the inside of their poopy butt hole, they’ll have to do it.
posted on 04/07/2014 7:01:57 AM PDT
Yeah, of course. They should all be impeached. We need term limits on the federal benches too. All of them. Not just the supremes.
posted on 04/07/2014 7:16:36 AM PDT
(A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
I wonder what the result would be if an anti-gun photographer was asked to take photos of live fire at a gun range? Would those same courts/judges find that he/she had no right to refuse?
posted on 04/07/2014 7:30:49 AM PDT
(How many more children must die on the altar of gun control?)
I’m disappointed it took six posts to make that point. I’m also disappointed in SCOTUS, but I’m used to that.
posted on 04/07/2014 7:31:28 AM PDT
by Cyber Liberty
(H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
By inaction the SC supported the case.
posted on 04/07/2014 8:11:32 AM PDT
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
Is this foretelling of the obamacare contraceptive/religious freedom case just heard? Worries me.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson