Skip to comments.Ann Coulter: Mitt Romney Will Lose in 2012 (Now She Says Yes To Romney in 2016?)
Posted on 04/07/2014 8:14:29 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
"...If we don't run Chris Christie, Romney will be the nominee and we'll lose."
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Is she now saying yes to Romney and no to Christie in 2016? IF, IF so, wouldn't that be a complete reversal?
Ann lost it years ago. I won’t even read her articles anymore.
A 4/3/2014 RealClearPloitics thread here at FR says “Coulter: Mitt Romney in 2016”
What is she thinking?
He will lose in 2012... but win in 2016?
What prompts you to dig up that old stuff right now?
Counting down till she endorses Jebby: 10.....9.....8.....
Makes you wonder whose side she is on and why?
Just write witty and speak outrageously, but don't prognosticate
Well, where are you? I have reference to the Freepers who, when an Ann Coulter article would appear on FR, would inevitably say: “The Rules, The Rules” (referring to a demand for photos of the “lovely” Miss Coulter). I always thought that they had an odd concept of female pulchritude.
What planet are you from?
What prompted the 4/3/2014 thread (3 days ago) here at FR that reads “Ann Coulter: Mitt Romney in 2016” in the Front Page News section?
No Red Herrings, please, and no Ad Hominem directede against me. They both distract from what we need to be talking about.
This thread isn’t about me...
She’s only settling for Romney because she’s had to admit that Christie has zero chance, and Romney is the next-best RINO.
Now, after my post, I see post 7, which features a photo of her. That should satisfy them.
The GOP nominated a RINO. That is why we lost.
We need to be talking about Romney and Coulter??
I don't get it.
Does this idiot woman ever shut her pie hole?
All this “we have to run the electable one” stuff falls on my deaf ears. If you have to sell your soul to win, it’s better that you don’t win.
I did not say it was. I was just conforming to the practice of posting to the person who posted the thread, that’s all.
You asked me what prompted me to dig up that old stuff (in post #4), and I replied that you don’t need to be directing this thread to me asking me what you did.
This thread is about Coulter, not me.
Read your post in post #4, my reply in post #11, your reply in post #17 and then this post. Then you will get it...
I was going to say they will never be a Bush v Clinton election since they are ideological partners but then I realized that would be beautiful for them - the Bush/Clinton party could not possibly lose that election.
and about Romney. Romney/Coulter.
Where's the part about Coulter calling for Romney to run in 2016 in that two year old clip?
The leftists have something on her....pictures, videos....
This whole thing is based on what she said on Howie Carr. She just stated that on Immigration, I repeat Immigration, Romney had the best policy. Romney’s position was to encourage self deportation, while everybody else considering to run in 2016 has some sort of amnesty. She said nothing more or less on the matter.
See, the way it works is we are all supposed to get together and heap praise of talking heads who oppose everything we claim to believe in. That way when the election is 2 weeks away, we can feel good about abandoning principle again, because those heroic tv and radio people agree with ‘us’. And SHIRLEY ‘we’ can’t all be wrong!
Then when the RINO loses again, we can blame people who refused to play along with the Alice in Wonderland delusion we collectively built to live in.
Think of it an an exercise in rank stupidity that plays out every couple years.
Just FYI, I didn’t post that thread to frontpage. Someone added it.
To your point though ... it boggles the mind. I wish I could find the exact quote from her book but I can’t. She wrote about how we lose EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. when we run a moderate and win when we run a conservative. Then she championed Christie and now Romney.
FWIW, I don’t think she seriously believes Romney will run again. I think she’s just being Ann, which is to say controversial.
Maybe she's not as conservative as she seems to have convinced you that she is.
Romney, ...YAWN !
Ann, you have made yourself irrelevant. Please go away. Quietly.
That 2012 video sounds like ‘Breaking News’
I hope Megyn Kelly covers it tonight.
Is she on some sort of med she routinely forgets to take?
She hasn’t been a conservative for years.
Ann isn’t getting enough nutrients for proper brain function.
Annie needs to have some stud take her to the Caribbean and realign her priorities. Sorry Annie, you have jumped the shark too often to any creds along these lines.
We sure dodged a bullet by electing Obama instead of that rich Mormon, huh. /s
Yes we did. The enemy is to our front, instead of behind our backs, and the rich Mormon coupled his evil with a work ethic. Best to have the malefactor who is lazy and addled.
You call it exactly. The re-runs are tedious. IMO, we get no where until conservatives own the GOP lock, stock, and barrel - which I do NOT think will happen - or until we jettison the ruin and begin anew.
Who even listens to her anorexic psycho babble anyway?
I lost all respect for her when she went on her anti-tea party tirade. Now she supports all R incumbents, regardless of their interest in representing the Constitution.
She is dead to me and I will never buy another of her books. In fact, I fast forward through any segment on any radio program that has her on as a guest.
There is no hope for owning or fixing the GOP. People have said that for 30 years and every election they go further left.
No one buys a business whose brand is wrecked and holds no value. It is a waste of money best spent on a viable candidate or starting from scratch. Had people listened years ago we would have that viable entity today. Instead they kick the can every cycle and then scream when someone calls them on it.
Well, where is the fixed GOP they promised for 30 years now? Where is an indication the GOP is more conservative than 2 years ago muxh less 20?? Were any feet EVER held to the fire?
So here we are. We can continue listening to Cheshire Cats or get back to the real world. Not both.
You did happen to notice the question mark (?) after the word Rhetorical in post #20? Hmmm?
I put it there for a reason (albeit a sarcastic one).
She does not have me fooled, much less convinced. Ergo, the word “seems” that you wrote would not apply to me.
Ergo Sum, I am not convinced of anything pertaining to her “conservatism.”
What do you have a crash on Ann Coulter or something?
according to Willard’s religion we have a Mormon in the White House...
Obama’s Mom was dead dunked into Mormonism and then “sealed” to her children making them Mormons also..
Its not reversible..theres no way to apostate from a dead dunking conversion..
Its part of the Mormon doctrines and beliefs...
the Romneys believe this...
2012 was Mormon V Mormon..
so we already have a Mormon president...
So when I respond to your posts that means I have a crash? on Ann Coulter? Do all the others who have started innumerable threads here ast FR have a “crash” on her?
Once again, you direct a post at me, and not the topic at hand, which is yet another attempt at Ad Hominem by you.
Why are you a RINO-protecting liberal?
To Admin Moderator: we do have a policy against personal attacks, right? Please preview sickoflibs posts consistently directed at me and not the topic at hand. Thank you.
Sane for me...
Personal attacks LOLO
Ad Hominem LOLO, you are killing me.
Romney was the vastly overwhelming choice in the 2012 primary but lost because the 3 million so called conservative purists stayed home......simple as that.
Romney was Romney and everyone who voted for him in the primary knew that.......I knew that and that's why I voted for another candidate.
But I didn't stay home and pout and complain, I knew damn well he was better than Obama and that's why I supported him.......
Everyone who stayed home can blame themselves for what we got in return........
I don't think she's all that conservative, nor are her defenders. You know, the losers who post cartoons of her in a tricornered hat.