| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/07/2014 1:17:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
enough! |
Posted on 04/07/2014 11:13:40 AM PDT by Dave346
KIEV, Ukraine — The Ukrainian government dispatched its highest-level police and security officials to the eastern part of the country Monday in an effort to put down separatist violence described as inspired by Russia and following a script that played out in Crimea.
“The plan is to destabilize the situation,” Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk told an emergency cabinet meeting Monday morning. “The plan is for foreign troops to cross the border and seize the country’s territory, which we will not allow.”
On Sunday, pro-Russian demonstrations in the eastern cities of Kharkiv, Donetsk and Luhansk that had been orderly the last few weekends turned dangerous when crowds broke off and began to occupy government buildings in the three cities.
“Yesterday, a second wave of the Russian Federation’s special operation against Ukraine started,” acting President Oleksandr Turchynov told the nation Monday in a televised address. “The goal is to . . . topple Ukrainian authorities, disrupt the elections and to tear our country apart.” He charged that “enemies of Ukraine are trying to repeat the Crimean scenario,” but he vowed that they would not succeed and that “an antiterrorist operation will take place against those who took up weapons.”
Turchynov said those taking part in the violence were committing “a serious crime,” and he warned that “we will act appropriately and decisively against the criminals.”
In Donetsk, a group of people who broke into the regional administration building and spent the night there announced Monday that they were setting up a Donetsk People's Republic. They and others who occupied buildings in Kharkiv were demanding a Crimean-style referendum.
The situation in Kharkiv appeared particularly dangerous after pro-Ukrainians from Kiev reportedly headed to the city early Monday. Fights were breaking out on Kharkiv’s main square Monday, local reporters said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
No, I am stating that it OCCURED.
And I put up the thread that was entitled “Can the Qur’an be trusted?” that demolished the reliability of the Qur’an (Koran). No pro-Muslim person would do this, you liar and instigator.
To Admin Moderator:
TigersEye started all of this between us. I never would have. I want this to remain on the issues, not personal, but he and 1rudeboy can’t seem to help themselves. Anyone can follow this back and see that they are agitators.
Either you're a pro-Muzzie agitprop or you're a pro-Russian agitprop. Which is it?
I have proof that I’m not a Muslim, TigersEye. LOL, you liar. I demloished the reliability of the Koran, liar.
This all goes back to post #26 when you spewed lies at the beginning of your post to me: “you Muslim narcoterrorist propagandist”
You dug yourself a big hole there, liar TigersEye.
ping
Creating cover stories for yourself doesn’t prove anything.
Would you two please knock it off. This thread is not about you. Open a thread in the backroom and rip each others eyes out.
I don’t think he’s a muslim. Just misguided, and not very smart.
You don’t get to decide what is releveant or what people get to post here. Get it? Good.
Nor do you get to imply that since I brought it up and since to you (oh great decider) that it must be irrelevant, then I’m either pro-Muzzie or pro-Russsian agitpropist, neither of which you have proven but which you say I must be one of the two. Both of which are lies.
Agaian, Admin Moderator, TigersEye’s lies and personal attacks (Ad homs) need to stop.
Enough already!!
Apparently your answer is "I'm not a Muzzie agitprop I'm a Russian agitprop."
Please, no selfies, 1rudeboy.
I agree.
If we didn’t have TigersEye and 1Rudeboy derailing threads (as we can see from the start), you and I wouldn’t be talking right now.
Just saying, I agree with you, but I think you are telling the wrong person. They will derail threads with Ad Homs by starting with them. Ididn’t. Not good for Free Republic as it drives away traffic.
Have a good day, Jim.
You illogically conflate. Just because it was/is a sham, doesn’t mean that it is irrelevant to talk about - and as you don’t get to decide what is or isn’t irrelevant or - relevant. LOLOLOLOL.
Apparently your answer is what it was. You couldn’t prove that you aren’t pro-Muzzie. I did. Sucks to be you.
And I never called you a Russian agitprop, as this use of Ad Homs is used by you to defelect attention away from you to others. I could care less about Russia. But you keep using the words Russian agitpropist.
Thou dost protest too much. Wonder why...
Are you saying your support the Russian annexation of The Crimea?
Knock it off!! NOW!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.