Skip to comments.
Supreme Court declines to hear religious freedom photography case
cna ^
| April 8, 2014
| Adelaide Mena
Posted on 04/08/2014 4:30:39 AM PDT by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: NYer
Nine black-robed chickens. The Supreme Court should be eliminated if it can’t protect the rights of the Christian minority in this country.
To: SECURE AMERICA
Where are the names of the people bringing this suit, I can see “Willock” but that’s where it always ends,
We need to have photos and names of these people. The pictures and names need to be front and center in the public eye so we know who these people are.
22
posted on
04/08/2014 6:35:22 AM PDT
by
canuk101
To: Rashputin
To: NYer
Supreme Court = Term limits
24
posted on
04/08/2014 7:00:22 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: NYer
“The Supreme Court ignored an opportunity to reaffirm the basic principle that the government may not trample on fundamental rights of free speech and the free exercise of religion,” Perkins added.They didn't ignore it...By letting it stand, they confirmed it...It will now become precedence...
25
posted on
04/08/2014 8:07:56 AM PDT
by
Iscool
(Ya mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailer park...)
To: NYer
There are at least 5 crooked lawyers with black robes on the SC.
26
posted on
04/08/2014 8:39:30 AM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson