Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Issa Report Slams Dem Collaboration with the IRS
FrontPage Magazine ^ | April 8, 2014 | Arnold Ahlert

Posted on 04/08/2014 7:24:06 AM PDT by SJackson

- FrontPage Magazine - http://www.frontpagemag.com -

Issa Report Slams Dem Collaboration with the IRS

Posted By Arnold Ahlert On April 8, 2014 @ 12:38 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | No Comments

A bombshell report released by House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) completely refutes Democratic Party talking points that the IRS scandal involved unwarranted targeting of both liberal and conservative groups. “Time and again, (Democrats) have claimed that the IRS targeted liberal- and progressive-oriented groups as well—and that, therefore, there was no political animus to the IRS’s actions” the report states. “These Democratic claims are flat-out wrong and have no basis in any thorough examination of the fact. Yet the Administration’s chief defenders continue to make these assertions in a concerted effort to deflate and distract from the truth about the IRS’s targeting of tax-exempt applicants.”

The report reveals far more about the early stages of Tea Party targeting conducted by the tax collection agency, identifying the initial three cases sent to Washington, D.C. for additional scrutiny in 2010. Two of the three abandoned their applications rather than face additional IRS questioning. The third group is still waiting for its case to be resolved.

Several other key findings of the report are equally troubling. Perhaps the most troubling of all was that the IRS itself  “selectively prioritized and produced” documents for the Committee to support the narrative that their targeting had been bipartisan. It noted that on June 24, 2013, Acting IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel asserted during a press conference that the agency misconduct was “broader” that conservative applicants, even as he refused to discuss the criteria that led him to that conclusion. Nonetheless, the IRS subsequently produced “hundreds of pages of self-selected documents that supported his assertion,” even as they had only provided the Committee with less than 2000 total pages of IRS material. “Congressional Democrats had no qualms in putting these self-selected documents to use,” the report states.

Those Democrats included Ranking Member Elijah Cummings (D-MD), Ranking Member Sander Levin (D-MI) , and Representative Gerry Connolly (D-VA), all of whom made “misleading statements that the IRS targeted liberal groups based on the selectively produced documents.” 

Furthermore, the IRS “was not an unwilling participant” in promoting this charade. When it came time to produce these selective documents, they “suddenly reversed” their previous interpretation of a law that had prevented them from releasing confidential taxpayer information to the American public. The reinterpretation allowed the IRS to release info on three leftist groups, ACORN, Successors and Emerge.

Yet IRS agents who testified before the Committee noted that these groups were scrutinized because the IRS believed they were old organizations attempting to apply as new ones. The report itself notes that unlike the Tea Party, such groups were not subjected to a “case sensitive report” or reviewed by the IRS’s Chief Council. And while IRS documents showed that some liberal groups were being scrutinized, “only Tea Party applicants received systematic scrutiny because of their political beliefs,” and “public and nonpublic analyses of IRS data show that the IRS routinely approved liberal applications while holding and scrutinizing conservative applications.”  

The report further labels the IRS efforts to make their subsequent scrutiny more neutral amounted to little more than “cosmetic changes,” even as the focus on conservative organizations continued. “Only seven applications in the IRS backlog contained the word ‘progressive,’ all of which were then approved by the IRS, while Tea Party groups received unprecedented review and experienced years-long delays,” it states. 

This reality aligns with testimony given by IRS officials Elizabeth Hofacre and her successor, Ron Bell. Both explicitly stated that only Tea Party groups had been targeted through the summer of 2011, even as they were equally explicit in rejecting the notion that progressive groups were held to anything remotely resembling the same standard. Hofacre revealed that she was on the project until October of 201 and was “only instructed to work “Tea Party/‘Patriot’/9/12 organizations.” Bell echoed that assertion, further noting that he inherited 50-100 cases from Hofacre, all of which were Tea Party cases.

Even when the BOLO (be on the lookout for) criteria were changed by Lois Lerner, and term “Tea Party” became “advocacy organizations,” the IRS “still intended to identify and single out Tea Party applications for scrutiny.” In further testimony, Bell noted that the change amounted to nothing significant as non-Tea Party cases were either moved to closure or further development, while Tea Party cases remained on hold—for an entire year–pending guidance from Washington. 

What about offsetting testimony? “Unlike Tea Party cases, the Oversight Committee’s review has received no testimony from IRS employees that any progressive groups were scrutinized because of their organization’s expressed political beliefs,” the report states.

One of the more devastating takedowns of Democratic contentions concerns Lerner’s initial revelation about the IRS’s nefarious efforts. The report resorts to pure logic, noting that when Lerner “publicly apologized for the IRS’s targeting of Tea Party applicants, she offered no such apology for its targeting of any liberal groups. When asked if the IRS had treated liberal groups inappropriately, Lerner responded: ‘I don’t have any information on that.’ This admission severely undercuts Democratic ex post allegations of bipartisan targeting.”

A series of emails between IRS officials are included in the report, with one especially damning one penned by Lois Lerner. “Tea Party matter very dangerous,” it states. “this could be the vehicle to go to court on the issue of whether Citizen’s United overturning the ban on corporate spending applies to tax exempt rules.” In addition to the obvious bias directed towards the Tea Party, this email suggests that Lerner was sympathetic, if not outright supportive, of the Americans left’s determination to undermine the Supreme Court’s decision disallowing government restrictions on political advocacy spending by corporations, associations and unions.

Lerner made her position clearer during a speech at Duke University in October of 2010, when she insisted that Citizens United “dealt a huge blow, overturning a 100-year-old precedent that basically corporations couldn’t give directly to political campaigns.” Lerner went on to reveal the pressure under which the IRS was operating as a result. “The FEC can’t do anything about it. They want the IRS to fix the problem,” she said. “Everybody is screaming at us right now: ‘Fix it now before the election. Can’t you see how much these people are spending?’”

Who “they” are remains a mystery. Lerner has appeared before the Committee on two occasions. Both times she asserted her Fifth Amendment right, protecting her from self-incrimination. 

What happens next remains to be seen. Last Thursday, the House Oversight Committee indicated they would be holding a vote this week on whether to hold Lerner in contempt of Congress. During a June hearing, a party-line vote by the Committee panel determined that Lerner had waived her Fifth Amendment rights when she made an opening statement during her first appearance last May. When she reiterated that right during her second appearance, she left herself vulnerable to a charge of obstruction. The process moves to the House, where John Boehner (R-OH) has indicated he will allow a vote on the contempt of Congress charge. If Lerner is found guilty, the matter is directed to a grand jury, where she could receive a prison sentence between a month and a year or a fine between $100 and $1,000.

The report makes it clear why Lerner’s testimony is critical. “The committee will never be able to fully understand the IRS’s actions,” it states. “Lerner has unique, firsthand knowledge of how and why” the IRS targeted conservative organizations for unwarranted scrutiny.

In the meantime, the political fault lines have been clearly illuminated. “For months, the Administration and congressional Democrats have attempted to downplay the IRS’s misconduct,” the report states in final paragraph of its executive summary. “First, the Administration sought to minimize the fallout by preemptively acknowledging the misconduct in response to a planted question at an obscure Friday morning tax-law conference. When that strategy failed, the Administration shifted to blaming ‘rogue agents’ and ‘line-level’ employees for the targeting. When those assertions proved false, congressional Democrats baselessly attacked the character and integrity of the inspector general. Their attempt to allege bipartisan targeting is just another effort to distract from the fact that the Obama IRS systematically targeted and delayed conservative tax-exempt applicants.”

The Prescott Arizona Tea Party is the poster child for those delays. Despite being one of the first three groups targeted, they have yet to be notified about the status of their application—more than 51 months later. “I don’t see much equality under the law there,” said spokesman Rick Harbaugh. That’s because there is none.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deadenddarrell

1 posted on 04/08/2014 7:24:06 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

B. Hussein Obama continues unimpeded as the arrogant Democrat leader of the Left Wing, Anti-Work Counterculture thanks to doormat Republicans such as Boehner, Cantor, Ryan, Issa, McConnell, and McCain.

Counterculture Democrats reap what they sow, and doormat Republicans gladly provide the fertilizer.

What can possibly go wrong?


2 posted on 04/08/2014 7:30:56 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Any time I see “Issa” in a headline, I immediately translate it to:

Attention whore Darrell Issa states he’s not getting enough attention. Claims he will do something dramatic, (but he won’t).


3 posted on 04/08/2014 7:30:56 AM PDT by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Steny Hoyer was on “Fox & Friends” this morning, saying this is all just a Republican witch hunt.


4 posted on 04/08/2014 7:31:46 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I searched for the word “arrest” and didn’t find it. Enough talk.


5 posted on 04/08/2014 7:31:47 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
A bombshell report released by House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) completely refutes Democratic Party talking points that the IRS scandal involved unwarranted targeting of both liberal and conservative groups

To be followed with an aggressive fund raising appeal so that they can help change Washington DC.

Show me some convictions and maybe I will care

6 posted on 04/08/2014 7:43:22 AM PDT by capydick (''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
"I searched for the word “arrest” and didn’t find it. Enough talk."

Yes, subpoena the IRS witness and if they are held in contempt, arrest them and put them in the House jail. Only then will we smoke out the Administration. (I wonder if we would get a DOJ armed attack to free them, but let's find out.).

7 posted on 04/08/2014 7:44:00 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I am waiting for the strongly worded letter....


8 posted on 04/08/2014 7:57:29 AM PDT by copaliscrossing (Comparison is the beginning of discontent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

and yet, still no handcuffs or orange jumpsuits...


9 posted on 04/08/2014 8:00:20 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Any time I see “Issa” in a headline, I immediately translate it to:

Attention whore Darrell Issa states he’s not getting enough attention. Claims he will do something dramatic, (but he won’t).

By "dramatic action", I take it you mean he's lined himself up for another segment on Greta's show. That's about as far as it will go.

10 posted on 04/08/2014 8:08:22 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Did he write another letter to MomJeans?


11 posted on 04/08/2014 8:08:39 AM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
He talks and talks and talks. Does he ever get to kick a football though?

Nope.


12 posted on 04/08/2014 8:13:49 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Something tells me the House Jail has a minibar and a jacuzzi, probably a breakfast buffet..


13 posted on 04/08/2014 8:16:34 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

When this fraud actually does something to stop Dem criminality, I may fall over from shock.

But I’m not putting down padding in anticipation.


14 posted on 04/08/2014 8:18:34 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

*** By “dramatic action”, I take it you mean he’s lined himself up for another segment on Greta’s show. That’s about as far as it will go. ***

I wonder if people like Issa ever get a clue that they’ve become a self parody? Or, maybe the joke is on people like me, and Issa’s antics pay off for him?


15 posted on 04/08/2014 8:23:07 AM PDT by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
From the Executive Summary:

"... In September 2013, USA Today published an independent analysis of a list of about 160 applications in the IRS backlog. This analysis showed that 80 percent of the applications in the backlog were filed by conservative groups while less than seven percent were filed by liberal groups. A separate assessment from USA Today in May 2013 showed that for 27 months beginning in February 2010, the IRS did not approve a single tax-exempt application filed by a Tea Party group. During that same period, the IRS approved “perhaps dozens of applications from similar liberal and progressive groups.” 15"

16 posted on 04/08/2014 8:29:09 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
...completely refutes Democratic Party talking points that the IRS scandal involved unwarranted targeting of both liberal and conservative groups. “Time and again, (Democrats) have claimed that the IRS targeted liberal- and progressive-oriented groups as well—and that, therefore, there was no political animus to the IRS’s actions” the report states. “These Democratic claims are flat-out wrong ...

These claims against us - yes, bwownsfan - if you're a conservative - these claims by liberal liars were against YOU and me and all of us. And my question to you is why aren't you offended by being lied about? Why are you standing with the liberal liars on this issue?

17 posted on 04/08/2014 8:31:16 AM PDT by GOPJ (.'Dog Shit' could be sold to 7 million citizens if the IRS fined those who refused to buy it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

“Why are you standing with the liberal liars on this issue?”

Seriously? You’ve cast me in with liberals because I think that Darrell Issa is a contemptible attention whore who is incompetent, impotent, and does far more harm than good?

Whatever helps you sleep at night.


18 posted on 04/08/2014 8:36:15 AM PDT by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

I think you’re offbase in your interpretation of brownsfan’s remarks. He seemed plenty offended to me, moreso at Issa’s “all talk, no action” performance as a Committee Chairman.


19 posted on 04/08/2014 8:36:36 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Really? What would you expect from that side? Liberals are a bunch of manipulators and liars... it's why the prison system is full of democrats.
20 posted on 04/08/2014 8:46:12 AM PDT by GOPJ (.'Dog Shit' could be sold to 7 million citizens if the IRS fined those who refused to buy it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
Look when our people are attempting to do the right thing - like Issa - and they're taking on liberal thugs and press goons at the same time - the least we can do is be mildly supportive.

Maybe Brownsfan should save a little of his contempt for the IRS thugs... the people who tried to take away our right to assemble peacefully to support our candidates.

21 posted on 04/08/2014 9:12:41 AM PDT by GOPJ (.'Dog Shit' could be sold to 7 million citizens if the IRS fined those who refused to buy it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Maybe Brownsfan should save a little of his contempt for the IRS thugs... the people who tried to take away our right to assemble peacefully to support our candidates.


Maybe Issa & Boehner should do what they were elected. Defend our constitutional rights. People continue to be assaulted by the obama admin. Boehner, Issa and the rest of his stooges have done nothing to stop it. Period. Those are the facts. Sorry if you don’t like them, FRiend.


22 posted on 04/08/2014 9:18:03 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Odds doesn’t put his money where his mouth is.


23 posted on 04/08/2014 10:30:03 AM PDT by jch10 (The Democrat mascot shouldnÂ’t be the donkey; it should be the tick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jch10

Issa.....android changed it...sorry


24 posted on 04/08/2014 10:31:27 AM PDT by jch10 (The Democrat mascot shouldnÂ’t be the donkey; it should be the tick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Tell me what you want him to do... You know, within the framework of our laws and the reality of a press that hates us. And I don’t mean something like ‘be tough’. We all ‘get that’.... but HOW to ‘be tough’... Remember within our legal system...
And skip the ‘tell the people’.... the press trumpets what democrats want people to hear. Again, tell me HOW...


25 posted on 04/08/2014 10:52:56 AM PDT by GOPJ (.'Dog Shit' could be sold to 7 million citizens if the IRS fined those who refused to buy it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Tell me what you want him to do... You know, within the framework of our laws and the reality of a press that hates us. And I don’t mean something like ‘be tough’. We all ‘get that’.... but HOW to ‘be tough’... Remember within our legal system...
And skip the ‘tell the people’.... the press trumpets what democrats want people to hear. Again, tell me HOW...


Where do I start? There are so many things. Obama must be engaged directly and on a consistent basis. Immediately after the first IRS hearing the Dem game plan became clear. At that point Boehner should have directly engaged Obama and insisted on certain things. Full cooperation or no funding for the IRS. Instead we got hit and run “who’s going to jail” BS from leadership while citizens continued to be abused.

There should be a unified GOP message dealing with the MSM. GOP mavericks pinch hitting for Team Dem should be dealt with severely by leadership. Instead they get a free pass to damage the GOP opposition to the Dem agenda. Those bad actors have nothing to do with MSM bias and it is 100% on Team GOP for allowing it.

It’s been pretty much FAIL across the board for Boehner & McConnell. One preemptive surrender after another the past few years. I can only conclude that is because they just don’t care to defend us against assaults by the obma admin. They refuse to do the heavy lifting required to destroy the rampaging Dems.


26 posted on 04/08/2014 11:23:25 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Any time I see “Issa” in a headline, I immediately translate it to:

10 years ago or longer, my son told me "Issa is only out for Issa" Took me awhile to see the light.....

27 posted on 04/08/2014 11:28:05 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson