Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Moral Compass Changes on Iraq
Asia Times ^ | 4/7 | Adil E Shamoo

Posted on 04/08/2014 4:39:02 PM PDT by nickcarraway

in a speech in Brussels on March 26, President Barack Obama rejected Vladimir Putin's assertions regarding the wrongs of the United States invasion of Iraq. Rhetoric aside, the Russian president has no moral standing for the invasion and annexation of Crimea. Nevertheless it is important to look at Obama's own moral arguments in justifying an invasion that a majority of US citizens regard as a major US foreign policy disaster.

Putin called into question the legitimacy of the coalition behind the Iraq invasion by pointing out that president George W Bush declared, "If you are not with us, you are against us." Putin further mocked US respect for international law, saying "it's a good thing

that they at least remember that there exists such a thing as international law - better late than never". But mocking tone or not, we have a problem: both of Putin's statements have legitimacy.

In order to justify the invasion of Iraq, Obama recently claimed that "America sought to work within the international system." In fact, the United States was selective about which international law to invoke before the invasion. For example, there was no UN resolution authorizing the invasion of Iraq; the UN charter forbids such an invasion.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; crimea; iraq; obama

1 posted on 04/08/2014 4:39:03 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Obama Moral Compass?

I don’t recall him ever being accused of having one.

2 posted on 04/08/2014 4:41:41 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I had the same question: Moral compass? 0bama? Really? Since when?
3 posted on 04/08/2014 4:43:59 PM PDT by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Adil E Shamoo

4 posted on 04/08/2014 4:45:57 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

5 posted on 04/08/2014 5:02:36 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Agree with some of this writer's points, but there is a bit of historical revisionism going on as well.

The Iraq invasion may have been a disaster in hindsight, but there was no violation of international law involved.

6 posted on 04/08/2014 5:24:52 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Not to mention Putin’s claim that regarding the invasion of Iraq, Bush said “if you’re not with us, you’re against us.”
In reality, nine days after the 9-11 terrorist attacks, Bush said
“And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.”

7 posted on 04/08/2014 5:46:27 PM PDT by JoeRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson