Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armed Fed Agents and Snipers? Nevada Rancher Is Taking on the Govít in a Battle at Breaking Point
The Blaze ^ | Apr. 8, 2014 | Becket Adams

Posted on 04/09/2014 8:28:06 AM PDT by xzins

Armed federal agents deployed last week to northeast Clark County, Nev., for what can only be described as a major escalation in a decades-long standoff between a local cattle rancher and the U.S. government.

.Cliven Bundy, the last remaining rancher in the southern Nevada county, stands in defiance of a 2013 court order demanding that he remove his cattle from public land managed by the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management.

The 67-year-old veteran rancher, who has compared the situation to similar confrontations with government officials in Ruby Ridge and Waco, Texas, told TheBlaze that his family has used land in the 600,000-acre Gold Butte area since the late 1800s.

“I have raised cattle on that land, which is public land for the people of Clark County, all my life. Why I raise cattle there and why I can raise cattle there is because I have preemptive rights,” he said, explaining that among them is the right to forage.

“Who is the trespasser here? Who is the trespasser on this land? Is the United States trespassing on Clark County, Nevada, land? Or is it Cliven Bundy who is trespassing on Clark County, Nevada, land? Who’s the trespasser?”

Claiming that all other options have been exhausted, the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. National Park Service responded to Bundy’s inflexibility on the issue by calling on federal agents and contract cowboys to restrict access to the public land and to confiscate Bundy’s “trespass cattle.”

.“Cattle have been in trespass on public lands in southern Nevada for more than two decades. This is unfair to the thousands of other ranchers who graze livestock in compliance with federal laws and regulations throughout the West,” the Bureau of Land Management stated on its website about the case.

.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blm; bundy; clivebundy; fed; govtabuse; policestate; waco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2014 8:28:06 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

See total story at “The Blaze”

Waco revisited?


2 posted on 04/09/2014 8:28:50 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“Waco revisited?”

No comparison at all.


3 posted on 04/09/2014 8:30:20 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Will the government be as tough on Cliven Bundy as they are on Vlad Putin?


4 posted on 04/09/2014 8:35:25 AM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Within your rights and shot to death by cops is quick becoming a familiar feature of life and early death in the Untied States.

Dude needs to stand down and go with his life. He is going to be victimized. Better to cut losses and live. This is not ground worth dying for.

Save it for another day.


5 posted on 04/09/2014 8:36:26 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

From a Las Vegas station;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxiCA9AK_8k

Some locals show up;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsS8zXkrrCI


6 posted on 04/09/2014 8:39:55 AM PDT by maine yankee (I got my Governor at 'Marden's')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I said the gov would fire upon American citizens. I take it back. It has already happened.
But it looks like they are ready to do it again. There will be a flimsy excuse, which the media will do its best to promote.


7 posted on 04/09/2014 8:41:04 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Now, what part of the Constitution allows the Feds to scoop up land and keep it undeveloped?
8 posted on 04/09/2014 8:43:29 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45 (Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

I don’t think the Fed should own anything except their own buildings and military installations. Indian reservations should be honored as set-asides.

What did Jefferson do with the Louisianna Purchase?


9 posted on 04/09/2014 8:46:26 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins

While I beleive the use of such level of force is not warrented, the rancher is the source of the problem here.

It is not his land and he has not paid the fees to use the land. In other words, he is squatting on the land with his cattle.

I fail to see where the rancher has a legal leg to stand on.


10 posted on 04/09/2014 8:49:23 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

If he is correct that his family has used that land since the 1800’s, then he has standing, the same as right of way.


11 posted on 04/09/2014 8:51:15 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dusty Road

YET...


12 posted on 04/09/2014 8:55:20 AM PDT by mabarker1 (Please, Somebody Impeach the kenyan!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
Now, what part of the Constitution allows the Feds to scoop up land and keep it undeveloped?

That would be the F—k You!-clause.
That's the same clause that's used in things like Prop-8 going to the USSC: F—k You!
That's the same clause that's used to justify federal agencies running guns to drug cartels: F—k You!
That's the same clause that's used to allow the president to modift at-will the Affordable Care Act: F—k You!
That's the same clause that's used to allow congress to refuse to pass a budget, as required by law, for years on-end w/o consequence: F—k You!
and so forth.

Seriously, at this point in time it'd be easier to list what actions the federal government takes that are condoned by the Constitution.

13 posted on 04/09/2014 8:56:12 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
This is not ground worth dying for.

So...where do you draw your line?

14 posted on 04/09/2014 8:56:40 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
This is not ground worth dying for.

Maybe not for you, but it appears to be for him.

15 posted on 04/09/2014 8:58:04 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins

He’s on his own...They kill him and or throw him in a cage, and seize everything he’s ever owned...


16 posted on 04/09/2014 8:58:59 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

USG gone full *wild*, who can stop the beast?


17 posted on 04/09/2014 9:03:45 AM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

No, he doesn’t.

His family has used this land with permission of the rightful owner, under an agreement and with payment of a fee since the days of open range ended.

Cliven Bundy refused to sign a new agreement for use of the land twenty years ago, because he disagreed with the new terms and higher grazing fee.

If you use someone else’s land under an agreement requiring payment for use, and then decide you want to keep using it without an agreement or payment, you have no right to do so, whether the land owner is a private citizen or the federal government.


18 posted on 04/09/2014 9:03:54 AM PDT by Scoutmaster (Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

This graphic explains why Texas if it were a country will soon be the 8th largest producer of oil and gas in the world and other states west aren’t.


19 posted on 04/09/2014 9:04:43 AM PDT by dblshot (I am John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I am curious as to why the conservatives have not gathered in large numbers and simply walked through the “barriers” on the roads. Allowing the Fedzilla “Armed & Dangerous” to act away from the public’s eye is an invitation to another Waco.

Once before, the Shovel Brigade opened a road “closed” by abusive bureaucrats. IF the Armed & Rangerous are not planning murder, why close off the roads?


20 posted on 04/09/2014 9:04:59 AM PDT by GladesGuru (Islam Delenda Est - because of what Islam is and because of what Muslims do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson