Posted on 04/10/2014 7:38:45 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
FAIRBANKS — The University of Alaska Fairbanks is launching a widespread review of its procedures after dozens of students in the medical assistant program were told to inject each other with a solution that isn’t approved for human or animal use.
Students practiced their injection techniques with the unauthorized solution during each of the past two semesters, according to UAF.
Students only confirmed the potential danger after one of them contacted the manufacturer and was told to stop using the product immediately. Chancellor Brian Rogers called it “the most serious issue I’ve seen” since taking the top position at UAF in 2008.
“It should not have happened — I’m heartsick over it,” he said. “I’ve lost more sleep over this than any other issue in my six years as chancellor.”
Rogers said UAF accepts responsibility for the improper use of the solution, which is a Demo Dose product called “Simulated 0.9 percent Sodim Chlorde Injection” and whose label states that it shouldn’t be used on humans or animals. Students typically would use a sterile saline or water solution to practice their injections and use the Demo Dose product — “Sodim Chlorde” is the spelling listed on the product — only for injection pads or training devices.
Despite the warning, an instructor in two UAF Community and Technical College classes this year had students repeatedly inject each other with the solution. Students complained of burning sensations immediately following the injections and some also experienced skin irritation.
Rogers said that no health problems have been definitively linked to the injections but that UAF is still reviewing their effects.
UAF officials believe a total of about 30 students received improper injections during the past two semesters. A small number of injections occurred during the Clinical Procedures I class during the fall semester, but most took place in two Clinical Procedures II classes this school year, where students were told to use the solution to improve their injection skills.
It’s unclear how many cumulative injections students received. Classroom logs indicate that the average student got about 10 total injections, but those records may be incomplete, said CTC Dean Michele Stalder.
The instructor who taught the classes, term assistant professor Sherry Wolf of the Allied Health Department, has been placed on paid investigatory leave while the situation is reviewed. Stalder said Wolf, whose contract expires at the end of the school year, won’t have her contract renewed.
A broader review of the Allied Health Department is also being conducted. Rogers said the student complaints about the solution were made to a department administrator on Feb. 24 and should have been “reported up” to risk management and other UAF officials but that those contacts weren’t made. No other UAF employees have faced any personnel action so far, Rogers said.
UAF administrators said they only learned of the issue after Pocket Nurse, the Pennsylvania-based manufacturer of the solution, sent a March 6 letter responding to a student phone call that the product was being used during injection practice. The company had received “an alarming call” detailing the use of the solution on classmates, according to the letter.
Pocket Nurse President Anthony Battaglia stated in the letter that the company’s products “are clearly labeled on their labels, packaging and any documentation that the products are NOT to be used on human beings or animals.” The letter instructs UAF to stop misusing the products and get medical attention for the affected students.
Rogers said UAF is using an independent lab to determine whether the solution contains harmful substances. Preliminary tests have shown bacteria strains in at least some of the vials — Aeromonas hydrophila and bacteria from the genus Brevundimonas. One strain commonly causes a rash, while the other isn’t known to cause disease in humans.
The injections also included a 0.5 percent solution of the toxin isopropyl alcohol, which reportedly explains the burning sensation students reported. Rogers said other possible contaminants are still being sought and that UAF has agreed to pay for medical testing for those students affected.
“The students have reported other symptoms that we can’t explain at this point,” he said.
Rogers said final lab results, which will looking for a broad spectrum of bacterial and fungal agents, should be available by the end of the week. UAF believes that the improper use of the solution is limited to the past two semesters, based on procurement records from previous years. But it is conducting an analysis of its procurement procedures to be certain, and letters are also being mailed to summarize the injection problems to Wolf’s previous students, even those who aren’t known to be affected. Wolf began teaching at UAF as an adjunct professor in 2006, before being promoted to term assistant professor in 2009.
UAF officials have had several meetings with students in this semester’s class during the past month to provide testing updates. Stalder began contacting Wolf’s fall semester students on Monday to explain the situation.
Rogers said UAF officials were waiting for definitive test results before notifying past students but were spurred to act sooner after receiving a media question about the injections.
“It’s been a challenge,” Rogers said. “How do we provide the best information we have and not jump the gun?”
The issue also has caused academic concerns for some students, whose studies have been sidetracked by the issue in the past month. Rogers said the students pursuing medical assistant certificates or associate degrees are being offered tutors and make-up sessions.
In the wake of the controversy, Rogers and Stalder have launched a broad review of UAF procedures, including how incidents are reported, policies for responding to complaints, and procurement practices. University of Alaska Fairbanks President Pat Gamble has also requested a review of operations at UAF’s health programs.
Rogers said many questions, both regarding the injections and how they were allowed to happen, remain unanswered. He said he’s hopeful the picture will become clearer in the months ahead.
“At this point, we don’t know what we don’t know,” Rogers said.
Post#15 may clear up your misconception about the substance.
The substance is designed and marketed for use on training dummies and similar training aides.
The company even has a bold-font warning prominently displayed stating: “Demo Dose® is for educational purposes only, Not for Human or Animal Use. The products are sold solely for use in injecting an injection pad, manikin or simulator.”
This isn’t stupid from the company, they provide a valuable professional service and don’t misrepresent their products. This is purely idiocy from a community college instructor, said CC’s medical program and administration, and perhaps the few sad students that didn’t stand up for themselves and exercise confrontational-common-sense (to coin a term for telling your overlords that they’re dumb-f***s).
“unauthorized solutions”
Kool-Aid?
maybe the kids were just trying to find an antidote for the school cafeteria’s Mystery Meat ..?
Typical Chinese product, then. I remember when we had to throw out our dog food.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.