Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Militias head to Nevada rancher’s standoff with feds: We’re not ‘afraid to shoot’
Washington Times ^ | April 11, 2014

Posted on 04/11/2014 11:23:53 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s decades-long battle against the federal government over grazing rights has heated to the point where militia groups have joined in and taken up spots against the feds who’ve circled his land — and talk is, they’re not afraid to open fire.

A spokesman for the one of the militia groups said as much to local 8 News Now: I’m not “afraid to shoot,” he said.

Margaret Houston, Mr. Bundy’s sister and a cancer survivor, said at a town hall gathering this week that the situation “was like a war zone” and that she felt “like I was not in the United States,” The Daily Mail reported. The Las Vegas Review-Journal described it this way: “Serious bloodshed was narrowly avoided,” in a story about how dogs were unleashed on a woman who was pregnant while the rancher’s son was hit with a taser.

On Tuesday, armed Bureau of Land Management agents stormed Mr. Bundy’s property, escalating a court dispute that’s wound for two decades over the rancher’s refusal to pay for grazing fees.

~~snip~~

Now militia groups are on the scene, promising to help the Bundys keep up the fight.

“This is what we do, we provide armed response,” Jim Lordy, with Operation Mutual Aid, told the local broadcast station. “They have guns. We need guns to protect ourselves from the tyrannical government.”

Mr. Lordy also said “many more” militia groups are coming to the site to join in the Bundy family defense.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Nevada; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: atf; banglist; batfe; blm; bundy; bundyranch; chinadeal; chinawindfarm; chineselandreid; clarkcounty; dea; defendliberty; enn; fascism; fascistregime; fbi; govtabuse; guncontrol; harryreid; ins; irs; landgrab; militia; neilkornze; nevada; nevadarancher; nv; obama; reidchinadeal; reidcorruption; reidson; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-383 next last

1 posted on 04/11/2014 11:23:53 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

interesting times


2 posted on 04/11/2014 11:24:33 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I have mixed emotions about this. It’s a lease, the rancher is in default. Not overly complex.

BUT, the BLM are a bunch of asshats. I’ve dealt with them trying to push me around in NM, on land I OWN. They made various claims, lost in court, and still acted like assholes, doing the same thing. (A long story I won’t go into here.)

Wouldn’t be surprised if this is the straw that starts pushing people over the edge.


3 posted on 04/11/2014 11:27:09 AM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Bundy declared himself a citizen of Nevada and NOT the USA:

“Bundy appears to argue in his Motion to Dismiss (#4) that the Complaint (#1) should be dismissed because this Court lacks jurisdiction since Article IV of the Constitution cannot be imposed upon him. Bundy claims that he is a citizen of Nevada and not a citizen of a territory of the United States, and he also quotes religious texts. [*6] Bundy also brings in the Property Clause, the Commerce Clause and International Treaty laws. None of these statutes, laws or other citations is relevant to the jurisdictional issue...”

He also claims the federal government cannot own land, although the US Constitution says it CAN own land, and that Congress makes the rules on what to do with that land.

“Bundy claims this “decision concerning the Desert Tortoise, if fully implemented, would lead to the end of ranching in Clark County,” and his ranching days would be over. Reply (#7), p. 5. The decision from the BLM does not inform [*8] Bundy he can no longer graze livestock due to the protection of the Desert Tortoise, but instead reminds Bundy that his grazing permit would end at the end of the next month, February 1993, and the new permit application was attached to the decision.”

One of my closest friends is a rancher who buys grazing permits in 3 states to keep his cattle and sheep on. He pays for his grazing, but then, he considers himself to be a US citizen...


4 posted on 04/11/2014 11:28:28 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

5 posted on 04/11/2014 11:29:03 AM PDT by McGruff (I wouldn't be surprised if Jeb Bush pulled a Charlie Crist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Why doesn’t Sandoval do something? Kent University was going to be a footnote in history next to what this standoff is turning into.

Where the hell are the people who are supposed to be adults in this? Surely they don’t think this ranch should be the start of another civil war. Or maybe they do.


6 posted on 04/11/2014 11:29:07 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian
I have mixed emotions about this. It’s a lease, the rancher is in default. Not overly complex.

Actually, he's the last rancher on BLM land in Nevada. The BLM has been driving ranchers off for decades.

This is basically what the UN Agenda 21 end game is going to look like, only instead of ranchers it will be suburban homeowners.

7 posted on 04/11/2014 11:29:11 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The best way to control opposition is to lead it ourselves." -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Bookmark


8 posted on 04/11/2014 11:29:50 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
What part of a civil dispute warrants over 200 federal agents with guns, and tasing protesters?

/johnny

9 posted on 04/11/2014 11:30:50 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

I dislike the BLM. I once worked a few months for the USFS, but the Forest Service was a very different organization in 1979. I loathe the environmental laws Congress has passed, and their refusal to rein in the BLM, EPA & USFS.

However, this is a pretty straightforward case: the rancher refuses to pay for grazing permits, and has argued in court that he is not a US citizen. This is NOT the place for conservatives to rally!


10 posted on 04/11/2014 11:31:20 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Another bookmark


11 posted on 04/11/2014 11:31:28 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

BLM should be split up along with the lands they administer and handed off to the states.

And, really, the lands themselves should be sold off by lottery to US citizens. And BLM disbanded.

Aside from military bases and office complexes, the federal government has no need to own vast swaths of land.


12 posted on 04/11/2014 11:31:57 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

“...US Constitution says it CAN own land.”

Be a little more specific. What kind of land does the constitution say the feds can own?


13 posted on 04/11/2014 11:34:18 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Why has Obama created this crisis? What is he doing that he wants to divert attention away form?
14 posted on 04/11/2014 11:34:45 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

The original reason for the feds showing up is now a moot point.

Someone will have to back down, or there is going to be a firefight.

The feds can’t really back down, or they, from there on out, have no federal enforcement power.
So, that leaves The People backing down and capitulating, or it is settled with arms.


15 posted on 04/11/2014 11:35:05 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

“What part of a civil dispute warrants over 200 federal agents with guns, and tasing protesters?”

When cops are faced with a riot, what do they do? They go in with force and try to keep things under control by having a LOT of control. This is a standard police action. The guy is a nutjob who believes US law doesn’t apply to him. He thinks he has the right to graze as many cattle anywhere and anytime he wants - which will destroy a desert environment. It did it before, in the early 1900s.

Want to fight about something? How about the town in Arizona that can’t restore its water lines except by hand? THAT would be a fight I would drive to and support! But a rancher who wants free forage, while every other rancher in the US pays for it? Nope. Wrong fight, wrong cause.


16 posted on 04/11/2014 11:35:27 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is as good a place as any for it to begin. Lock and load.


17 posted on 04/11/2014 11:35:40 AM PDT by beelzepug ((you can't fix a broken washing machine by washing more expensive clothes in it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

We may be seeing the beginning of a real Sagebrush Rebellion II and an uprising of the silent majority. People are VERY fed up with the feds.


18 posted on 04/11/2014 11:35:52 AM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles (Remember, you can't spell "progressive" without "SS".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

land used for a legitimate government purpose


19 posted on 04/11/2014 11:36:59 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

“What is he doing that he wants to divert attention away form? “

I think there are limits to how long posts can be :-)


20 posted on 04/11/2014 11:37:55 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, deport all illegal aliens, abolish the IRS, DEA and ATF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Jim, This is a disgrace, and it’s not going to end well unless the BLM leaves the area, which they are not likely to do. Texans always talk about how they are stalwarts of the Republic, well my wife’s family were farmers in Northern Nevada and Texas has nothing on Nevada ranchers! The larger issue here is the fact that the Federal Government “owns” 85% of Nevada (and nearly half of California for that matter). That needs to be changed.


21 posted on 04/11/2014 11:38:23 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

Why has Obama created this crisis? What is he doing that he wants to divert attention away form?

***************

Look at Harry Reid first, the sockpuppet not so much. The current BLM fuhrer is a kid protege of Harry Reid and has some roots in this area.


22 posted on 04/11/2014 11:39:14 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

I’d expect a lot of other disgruntled ranchers then...


23 posted on 04/11/2014 11:39:18 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Maybe it's time to start pushing back or even pass time.
24 posted on 04/11/2014 11:40:06 AM PDT by The Cajun (tea party!!!, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug
I suspect the BLM will shoot one of their own to get the ball rolling.
25 posted on 04/11/2014 11:40:39 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The best way to control opposition is to lead it ourselves." -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I ask you, Father in Heaven, to calm the souls of all your children in NV, so that a peaceful outcome may be achieved. In Jesus name I pray, amen.

5.56mm

26 posted on 04/11/2014 11:41:23 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
The federal government has a reputation for forcing violent confrontations where it later turned out that things weren't so clear cut.

Ruby Ridge, and the government settlement of millions to Weaver jumps to mind. Weaver was a 'nut-job' according to the government and media.

Whatever the situation, the government needs to de-escalate the situation to ensure violence doesn't occur.

/johnny

27 posted on 04/11/2014 11:41:43 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

That’s not what it says.

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.


28 posted on 04/11/2014 11:41:55 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The gov of NV ought to send out the state police and arrest the BLM hoods.


29 posted on 04/11/2014 11:41:59 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They’ll attempt to either provoke a response or fake a response, kill everyone that can testify against them, hide all the evidence, and blame the protesters for being massacred.


30 posted on 04/11/2014 11:42:02 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: M Kehoe
Amen.

/johnny

32 posted on 04/11/2014 11:43:20 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

“Be a little more specific. What kind of land does the constitution say the feds can own?”

Given that the ratifying states then handed over large swathes of land to the US government, I’d have to say the original intent allowed the US government to own large swathes of land:

“Federal land ownership began when the original 13 states ceded title to more than 40% of their “western” lands (237 million acres between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River) to the central government between 1781 and 1802. Federal land acquisition from foreign countries began with the Louisiana Purchase (530 million acres) in 1803 and continued via treaties with Great Britain and Spain (76 million acres) in 1817 and 1819, respectively. Other substantial acquisitions (620 million acres), via purchases and treaties, occurred between 1846 and 1853. The last major North American land acquisition by the U.S. federal government was the purchase of Alaska (378 million acres) in 1867.”

http://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/crsreports/crsdocuments/RL34267_12032007.pdf

Are folks suggesting we need to give Alaska back to the Russians? Or revoke the Louisiana Purchase in 1803?


33 posted on 04/11/2014 11:43:35 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
This is NOT the place for conservatives to rally!

It never is. I don't blame him for not thinking of himself as a US Citizen. I feel the same way most days.
34 posted on 04/11/2014 11:44:53 AM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Meanwhile, our government turns unelected, unaccountable, unconstitutional bureaucrats into unconstitutional military-like armed police forces to conduct war against we the people. Under Marxist/fascist leaders like Obama, America is fast becoming a fascist police state.

If the bureaucrats at the BLM can get a valid eviction order from the court, then they should get the county sheriff to serve it.


35 posted on 04/11/2014 11:45:04 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrB

They’ll attempt to either provoke a response or fake a response, kill everyone that can testify against them, hide all the evidence, and blame the protesters for being massacred.

**************

I think they will confiscate or destroy more cattle, threaten Bundy with further action, call it a win and then leave. Everyone will go home. Things will go quiet. Then some dark night fedgov assassins masquerading as “law” enforcement will disable local communications and wipe the man and his family out.


36 posted on 04/11/2014 11:45:50 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Would a county sheriff serve a Federal eviction... maybe it would save face for this fellow.


37 posted on 04/11/2014 11:46:15 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Ping.


38 posted on 04/11/2014 11:46:18 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers; JRandomFreeper
The guy is a nutjob who believes US law doesn’t apply to him.

What do you call those running the fedgov who ignore laws on a wholesale basis, as matter of routine, all while rewarding millions of illegal alien trespassers who break our laws?

They have zero respect for our laws and rules and they don't think US law applies to them.

How come you're so excited about this one guy and his cows in Nevada?

39 posted on 04/11/2014 11:46:52 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

What’s the BLM so upset about? I’ve never heard of a cow eating turtles much less endangered ones.

Heard on Glenn Beck radio show that the rancher owes 1.1 million in fees, but it costs the government over 3 million to remove the cattle.


40 posted on 04/11/2014 11:47:30 AM PDT by A'elian' nation ("Political Correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

Got to watch out for those turtle-eating cows.


41 posted on 04/11/2014 11:48:31 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

apparently DC insiders have given oil drilling permists for the same land...

think bengazi was about video


42 posted on 04/11/2014 11:48:35 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Yes, the fedguv can own land. I always wondered about what kind of needful buildings were located on vast wastelands. Yes, we really needed 100,000 acres for ranger stations that are needed...because now we have 100,000 acres of land. Maybe someone has a different take on that clause :)


43 posted on 04/11/2014 11:49:09 AM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

So you can’t graze around oil rigs?

Anyhow what about the cows. If he cared about the cows they’d be moved to some other grazing.


44 posted on 04/11/2014 11:50:10 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I have heard everything possible on this situation. He refused to pay. The cost was raised to the point it was ridiculous. The BLM stopped taking lease money. Since 50 grazers have been forced out already something smells like B.S.


45 posted on 04/11/2014 11:50:19 AM PDT by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
50 grazers have been forced out already

That is what I was waiting for ... Thank You Starstruck. Has anyone interviewed any of these 50 to have their opinions on the record?

46 posted on 04/11/2014 11:53:32 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

47 posted on 04/11/2014 11:55:09 AM PDT by McGruff (I wouldn't be surprised if Jeb Bush pulled a Charlie Crist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

A couple hundred armed feds using dogs and Tasers against people who are not an immediate danger, and armed militia members who are not “afraid to shoot”, all triggered by grazing fees? If this is a contest to see who can be stupider, both sides look capable of accomplishing surprising things. I’d warn the militia that the feds are led by the world’s expert in the area of acting stupidly. I hope those civilians will be cautious, make prudent decisions, and ostentatiously film everything so that the facts will come out accurately. It would be nice if both sides would back off, but I’m not an optimist, not with the facts on the ground for both sides.


48 posted on 04/11/2014 11:55:57 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I wonder, since there are those here that argue the FEDERAL government is the almighty in this, and other cases, and they quote 19th century rulings and treaties, that if they would oppose the old Land Grants that were given back in those days.

So, they quote 19th century rulings, treaties et al, but ignore a 18th century document that founded the United States. A document that, it was the States who formed this federal government.


49 posted on 04/11/2014 11:56:14 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

What if the shooting does start? Think about that. I mean, really think about it. Maybe he should have submitted and paid the unjust fees like everyone else, but he didn’t. He took the risk and stood up against them. Does that make him a criminal? Remember, the government is are our servant. So what if the shooting starts? A man who isn’t a criminal will be murdered by the federal government that you would agree is tyrannical. The same government who is ignoring our borders and has given up huge chunks of Arizona to drug cartels. That government has come out in force against a cattle rancher.

I think the shooting will not start. The feds will deescalate.


50 posted on 04/11/2014 11:56:33 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-383 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson