Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems label foes ‘un-American’
The Hill ^

Posted on 04/12/2014 6:34:55 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Dems label foes ‘un-American’

By Niall Stanage - 04/12/14 06:00 AM EDT

Liberals have lately been employing a political term of abuse that was once mainly a weapon of the right.

Speaking at a Democratic fundraiser on Wednesday in Houston, President Obama described laws that he said restrict voting rights as “un-American.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) earlier this year described conservative activist billionaires Charles and David Koch as “un-American.”

And amid a rambunctious meeting of the House Oversight Committee last month, the panel's top Democrat, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) described the conduct of his Republican counterparts led by chairman Darrell Issa (Calif.) as "un-American."

“Un-American” has long been a multipurpose insult. A quick Web search reveals that it has been used as a term of objection to, among other things, the National Rifle Association, torture, Rush Limbaugh and a willingness to repair, rather than replace, consumer goods.

Among conservatives, the use of the term, or variants of it, extends far beyond the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy (R-Wis.) and the activities of the House Un-American Activities Committee.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) told MSNBC host Chris Matthews that then-Sen. Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, held “anti-American views.”

During the same period, Sarah Palin, the vice presidential running mate of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), praised “the pro-America areas of this great nation”, apparently in reference to regions where she and McCain were receiving more support.

Four years later, when Obama ran for reelection, former New Hampshire Gov. John Sununu (R) publicly expressed his wish that “this president would learn how to be an American.”

An Obama spokeswoman shot back that the remark was proof that the campaign of the president’s opponent, Mitt Romney, had “officially gone off the deep end.” Sununu apologized.

Some experts nevertheless believe that, in recent years, Democrats have become more likely to use the term.

“The Democrats have grabbed it and used it to disparage the wealthy — what they see as the robber barons — whereas back in the '40s, '50s and '60s, ‘un-American’ had more of a geopolitical tone as opposed to an economic tone,” said Tobe Berkovitz, a communications professor at Boston University.

“The term ‘un-American’ would tag you as a commie whereas now ‘un-American’ tags you as sort of being an evil wealthy person, preying on the poor.”

Others suggest that the word is freighted with meaning that lends itself more easily to use by conservatives.

“The left will use the term to point out undemocratic activities or behavior but the problem is that the term has a center of gravity that shifts it toward the right,” said Joseph Litvak, an English professor at Tufts University who is the author of The Un-Americans: Jews, the Blacklist and Stoolpigeon Culture.

“The left,” he added, “often tries to give it a philosophical meaning [but] the term is weighted with a whole history of, I would say, ethnic-bordering-on-racial invidiousness.”

In that context, he said, “‘American’ doesn’t primarily mean a philosophical position or a set of values. It means an ethnic identity. It tends to favor the white, the middle American, and the rural or suburban, at the expense of all the groups that are not those things.”

But can the term be fair rather than a slur, at least on occasion? Some defend it on the basis that the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the Constitution posit particular ideas and values. It would seem logical, they argue, that other, antithetical viewpoints can then be said to be un-American.

“Un-American, at least in the minds of liberal people, is said with a sneer, often,” said Peter Lawler, a government professor at Berry College and a co-editor of American Political Rhetoric. “And if you go back to something like the House Un-American Activities Committee, that is now seen as something stupid.

“On the other hand, among conservatives, it often is a term with real content to it. It’s the idea of being disrespectful to our underlying principles.”

Lawler asserts that a term such as “American socialist” is “unreasonable, because it so obviously contradicts our principles.”

Some see things quite differently, however. Berkovitz suggests that outright treason is about the only thing that can legitimately be described as un-American.

“You have the right to any thought,” he insisted. “This country is the marketplace of ideas. So if you want to be a communist, or a socialist, or a Nazi then — as long as you don’t want to violently overthrow the United States — that should be your right.”

Others, such as Litvak, are skeptical of the process they see as underlying the use of the word un-American.

“As far as I know, other nations do not have equivalent terms,” he said. “I’ve never heard of ‘un-English,’ ‘un-French,’ ‘un-Irish.’ This construction, the ‘un-American’ tells us that the coherence of the nation is kind of fragile and is constantly having to be shored up.”

Even if that is the case, however — and even if those who are labeled with the term object vigorously, as the Koch brothers have done — there is little reason to believe that the word will become extinct. It is, after all, almost as old as the nation itself.

“Thomas Jefferson was considered too French. He was called un-American and a Francomaniac,” said Rosemarie Ostler, author of Slinging Mud, a book covering two centuries of political insults. “He did things that weren’t ‘really American,’ like being interested in wine.

“Every time it comes up, it means something different.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: demagogicparty; demagogue; kenyanbornmuzzie; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Sub-Driver
There are two groups in this country, the "Americans", and the "un-Americans".

One group loves the country, the other group despises the country.

One group wants to preserve the country, the other wants to change it.

One group believes in the people, the other believes in central planning.

Feel free to add your own distinctions, but we all know which is which.

21 posted on 04/12/2014 7:31:34 AM PDT by oldbrowser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

-—— the other wants to change it.——

Au contraire mi amiga... (a little frog mex lingo there) the other has changed it. The change is a fait accompli.

The question now, for us, is how do we reverse the change and rid the country of the moonbats?


22 posted on 04/12/2014 7:34:28 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy

We should never apologize for stating the truth.

It IS un-American for dead folk to vote.

It IS un-American for Harry Reid to earn millions by “selling” his influence.

Let’s always have some true examples in mind to make our push-backs against Dem lies more vivid...


23 posted on 04/12/2014 7:35:22 AM PDT by pfony1 (Add just 6 GOP Senators and we "bury" Harry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Descent is the highest form or patriotism” -BJ Clinton


24 posted on 04/12/2014 8:08:58 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Pride Against God, Perversion, Gluttony, Greed, Sloth, Hatred, Envy, Treachery, Cruelty, Murder, Dehumanization, Insanity, Socialism.

— The platform of the Democrat party.


25 posted on 04/12/2014 8:25:31 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Projectin’


26 posted on 04/12/2014 8:53:02 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople (Nothing is more savage and brutal than justifiably angry Americans. DonÂ’t believe me? Ask the Germa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.”
- Isaiah 5:20


27 posted on 04/12/2014 8:53:31 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) told MSNBC host Chris Matthews that then-Sen. Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, held “anti-American views.”

A laughably clueless Niall Stanage seems not to understand the difference between "un-American" and "anti-American views".

The quality of reporting from The Hill is remarkably dumbed-down.

28 posted on 04/12/2014 8:55:24 AM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The Left knows good and well that its ideas are in direct conflict with those of America’s founding. That’s why they’re so touchy about the word un-American. Deep in their little rat hearts they know they’re guilty as charged.


29 posted on 04/12/2014 9:07:05 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic, and we should stand up and say, “We are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with ANY administration!””

Hillary Clinton, April 28, 2003 at the annual Democratic Party Jefferson-Jackson-Bailey Day fund raising dinner in Connecticut.

______

Guess she didn’t really mean that. After all, what difference does it make?


30 posted on 04/12/2014 9:15:09 AM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It is Leninist doctrine to accuse others of what the accuser is doing. Since the 60s the ‘rats have been taken over by reds, and of late, by Quranimals..


31 posted on 04/12/2014 9:31:34 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What would a democrat know anything about being an American?.


32 posted on 04/12/2014 9:53:12 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ted Kennedy writes to Andrpov to dis Reagan, Kerry hangs with Ortega to dis Reagan, and Obama bows to Saudi kings. All of them are Democrats..


33 posted on 04/12/2014 11:59:13 AM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The difference is when a Democrats (or Obama) says it, the media reports it as ho hum, matter of fact.

But when the GOP says “anti American” or “unAmerican,” the media goes into meltdown mode.

Imagine if Bush called the Democrats unAmerican? They’d have gone beserk. But Obama, the first black POTUS, can say anything he damn well pleases. And crickets.


34 posted on 04/12/2014 12:44:39 PM PDT by nhwingut (This tagline is for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson