Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Reid's last roundup
WorldNet Daily ^ | April 13, 2014 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 04/13/2014 4:38:49 PM PDT by libstripper

Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy performed a remarkable public service for America over the last couple weeks.

He exposed the utter ruthlessness, brutishness and Gestapo tactics of the federal government in dealing with honest, hard-working Americans who live off the land – our land.

Claiming Bundy’s cattle ranching operation was endangering desert tortoises, the Bureau of Land Management treated him like he was Ted Bundy. I take that back. The serial rapist, mass murderer and necrophile got due process.

When Cliven Bundy’s neighbors turned out to support him, as good American neighbors should, the BLM sent in helicopters, four-wheel-drive vehicles and an estimated 200 armed officers to deal with the cowboy and his family, threatening another Ruby Ridge or Waco-style slaughter

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bundy; china; reid; standoff
Looks like the whole Bundy special action was designed to steal land so Harry Reid, his family, and the Chicoms could set up a monstrous solar power horror in Nevada.
1 posted on 04/13/2014 4:38:50 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libstripper

You mean a bird scorching monstrosity to Gaia?


2 posted on 04/13/2014 4:41:45 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

I hope Mr. Bundy runs for president.


3 posted on 04/13/2014 4:42:33 PM PDT by ronnyquest (I spent 20 years in the Army fighting the enemies of liberty only to see marxism elected at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper; All
hopefully; this shall be "Rustler" Reid, gets "swung"..like Saddam.

4 posted on 04/13/2014 4:43:46 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

This episode seemed to have cooled rather quick after Searchlights own Dingy Harry came into the fold.

The fed never quits. They have created 1000 interpretations to nail anybody at any given time.

Barack Hussein Obama is the President.


5 posted on 04/13/2014 4:46:51 PM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
Thank you for the post. I usually take WND with a grain of salt, but on this one Joe is correct.
6 posted on 04/13/2014 4:47:53 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

I’m afraid Mr. Bundy won a battle but not a war...yet. The feds have, after all, virtually unlimited resources, and if they want to get him, they’ll find a way. It won’t be with cattle trucks and rent-a-cowboys next time, they misjudged the hell out of that. My bet is lawyers and courtrooms.


7 posted on 04/13/2014 4:50:37 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Looks to me like the Bundys got LOTS of due process.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/04/12/The-Saga-of-Bundy-Ranch


8 posted on 04/13/2014 4:51:52 PM PDT by Vesparado (The American people know what they want and they deserve to get it good and hard --- HL Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

This is far from over. Do not be fooled. Why was there a no fly zone and is it still in effect? Where did these people go? How many really left town? I do not trust any gov’t people. What was the real reason for this strategy? Where are the Bundy supporters and how long can they be from their own jobs, etc? Who and how many are there to protect this rancher? Is there cell service? Anyone have answers?


9 posted on 04/13/2014 4:52:12 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

and I thought the oil in America was American. I guess not. A lot of it is Chinese.


10 posted on 04/13/2014 4:52:46 PM PDT by MulberryDraw (Repeal it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Is this being reported in Nevada? Anywhere other than Fox or WND? I only see it here.


11 posted on 04/13/2014 4:53:08 PM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Well,,, according to the Blaze article;

“The Chinese company eventually shelved the project in June 2013 when it failed to find a customer. The deal is over and the proposed construction will not happen.”


12 posted on 04/13/2014 4:54:01 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/04/13/is-harry-reid-involved-seven-answers-to-seven-questions-youre-probably-asking-right-now-about-the-nevada-rancher-situation/


13 posted on 04/13/2014 4:55:08 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“with cattle trucks”

with BRAND NEW cattle trucks


14 posted on 04/13/2014 4:56:45 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Sure is GREAT that an intrepid FReeper grabbed implicating Files on Harry!!!

>https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ke3ap5qfw101r71/5YXGPwqndA<

>https://www.dropbox.com/sh/th7etvwuuk815o0/IPvUa6xBit<


15 posted on 04/13/2014 4:59:12 PM PDT by G Larry (There's the Beef!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

This could be the proverbial “Tear down the Berlin Wall” scenario in its very first opening stage.
maybe, just maybe it will be seen that its a hopeless scenario, the Feds cannot import enough mercenaries globally to fight against all Americans.

And those that did support the “New fundamentally changed America” do NOT want to be on the losing team.

Anytime, anyplace a similar situation arises it won’t be just 5,000 citizens, it will be 50,000.
And then 5 million.

Bunkervile was very successful but smarter people than me are even right now working on better logistics, faster deployments, possibly staging areas along key transportation routes, yet still “under the radar”.

Bunkerville.....

We will remember that name for the history books, communism CANNOT erase it or marginalize it.


16 posted on 04/13/2014 5:01:53 PM PDT by Spartan302
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

This is #1 of 75 videos on the subject. It might be an idea to download them all considering what happened at the Bundy Ranch this past week.<

SNIPER 101 Part 1 - Introduction - Rex Reviews

Published on Sep 9, 2012

Snipers, hunters, target shooters, ladies and gentlemen... Finally, Rex Reviews releases this long awaited free online long range shooting / sniper tutorial. TiborasaurusRex will walk you through everything you will need to know about sniper ammunition and cartridge selection, rifle and equipment options, basic and advanced external ballistics, making effective ballistic charts, rangefinders and distance determination, long range marksmanship, shooter / spotter team dynamics and communication, choosing a FFP, making the shot, spotting the shot, and much more.

This course goes far beyond what is covered in the U.S. Army FM23-10. So, if you can't make it to Quantico or the AMTU to learn these long range shooting skills, this video tutorial series will have you covered. We will get you set up to make amazingly accurate first round shots at 1 mile and beyond. Do you want to be able to zap that white tail buck at 1,275 yards and be confident it will be a nice clean kill? Watch this series!

All law abiding men and women in the free world who treasure their rifles MUST have these long range shooting skills for the continuation of our shooting culture and for the future preservation of our wonderful nation! Peace is beautiful, insure it by sharing these marksmanship skills with your friends and families to exponentially increase our nations already robust defense stature against. Stay clean, obey the law, and keep smiling.


17 posted on 04/13/2014 5:02:43 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Spartan302

Barack Hussein Obama is the President.


18 posted on 04/13/2014 5:03:18 PM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

When I was much younger and my limited christian teaching occasionally meant something one image persists, that of a picture of a false god, they say it had feet of clay and then of other elements including silver and gold, they were describing basically a man made god built with no strength in its foundation, which to me describes Obama to a “T”.


19 posted on 04/13/2014 5:07:38 PM PDT by Spartan302
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MamaB
Anyone have answers?

Well, no, we don't have any answers. You see, we have to kill them all before we know the answers."---Nancy Pelosi

FMCDH(BITS)

20 posted on 04/13/2014 5:09:28 PM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Spartan302

I do not understand what good folks of faith see in Obama.
He is not truthful nor is he a protector of rights given by our Creator.

He is a blatant liar and does not have a foundation of our Nation. November 2014 will reflect this.


21 posted on 04/13/2014 5:14:09 PM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MulberryDraw

It is because our national debt belongs to the Chicoms and the likes of Harry like to take advantage of that fact to enrich themselves.

Sell America to the highest bidder.

Delve a little deeper and you’ll find that there are other politicians that play the same game but have not been caught yet.


22 posted on 04/13/2014 5:24:30 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ronnyquest
I hope Mr. Bundy runs for president.

I hope Hairy Reed runs for his life, and fails.
23 posted on 04/13/2014 5:33:12 PM PDT by Old Yeller (In Latin, the word sinister means left. Which is appropriate for left-wingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

That, too.


24 posted on 04/13/2014 5:41:47 PM PDT by ronnyquest (I spent 20 years in the Army fighting the enemies of liberty only to see marxism elected at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: libstripper



25 posted on 04/13/2014 5:48:20 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

They scrapped the LAUGHLIN project.

THE LAUGHLIN...project.

Get to your map and look where Laughlin NV is.


26 posted on 04/13/2014 6:00:57 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Becks boys did a piss poor job of investigative reporting on this.

The Laughlin Project was dropped. Laughlin is 12 miles from me.

The area in question is the Dry Lake/Gold Bute zone-northeast of Vegas...which involved the Bundy Ranch.

The Blaze had better do their research better.


27 posted on 04/13/2014 6:11:32 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vesparado

Bundy relies on NRS 321.59 which has not been fully adjudicated

NRS 321.596 Legislative findings. The Legislature finds that:

1. The State of Nevada has a strong moral claim upon the public land retained by the Federal Government within Nevada’s borders because:

(a) On October 31, 1864, the Territory of Nevada was admitted to statehood on the condition that it forever disclaim all right and title to unappropriated public land within its boundaries;

(b) From 1850 to 1894, newly admitted states received 2 sections of each township for the benefit of common schools, which in Nevada amounted to 3.9 million acres;

(c) In 1880 Nevada agreed to exchange its 3.9-million-acre school grant for 2 million acres of its own selection from public land in Nevada held by the Federal Government;

(d) At the time the exchange was deemed necessary because of an immediate need for public school revenues and because the majority of the original federal land grant for common schools remained unsurveyed and unsold;

(e) Unlike certain other states, such as New Mexico, Nevada received no land grants from the Federal Government when Nevada was a territory;

(f) Nevada received no land grants for insane asylums, schools of mines, schools for the blind and deaf and dumb, normal schools, miners’ hospitals or a governor’s residence as did states such as New Mexico; and

(g) Nevada thus received the least amount of land, 2,572,478 acres, and the smallest percentage of its total area, 3.9 percent, of the land grant states in the Far West admitted after 1864, while states of comparable location and soil, namely Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, received approximately 11 percent of their total area in federal land grants.

2. The State of Nevada has a legal claim to the public land retained by the Federal Government within Nevada’s borders because:

(a) In the case of the State of Alabama, a renunciation of any claim to unappropriated lands similar to that contained in the ordinance adopted by the Nevada constitutional convention was held by the Supreme Court of the United States to be “void and inoperative” because it denied to Alabama “an equal footing with the original states” in Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. (3 How.) 212 (1845);

(b) The State of Texas, when admitted to the Union in 1845, retained ownership of all unappropriated land within its borders, setting a further precedent which inured to the benefit of all states admitted later “on an equal footing”; and

(c) The Northwest Ordinance of 1787, adopted into the Constitution of the United States by the reference of Article VI to prior engagements of the Confederation, first proclaimed the “equal footing” doctrine, and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, by which the territory including Nevada was acquired from Mexico and which is “the supreme law of the land” by virtue of Article VI, affirms it expressly as to the new states to be organized therein.

3. The exercise of broader control by the State of Nevada over the public lands within its borders would be of great public benefit because:

(a) Federal holdings in the State of Nevada constitute 86.7 percent of the area of the State, and in Esmeralda, Lincoln, Mineral, Nye and White Pine counties the Federal Government controls from 97 to 99 percent of the land;

(b) Federal jurisdiction over the public domain is shared among 17 federal agencies or departments which adds to problems of proper management of land and disrupts the normal relationship between a state, its residents and its property;

(c) None of the federal lands in Nevada are taxable and Federal Government activities are extensive and create a tax burden for the private property owners of Nevada who must meet the needs of children of Federal Government employees, as well as provide other public services;

(d) Under general land laws only 2.1 percent of federal lands in Nevada have moved from federal control to private ownership;

(e) Federal administration of the retained public lands, which are vital to the livestock and mining industries of the State and essential to meet the recreational and other various uses of its citizens, has been of uneven quality and sometimes arbitrary and capricious; and

(f) Federal administration of the retained public lands has not been consistent with the public interest of the people of Nevada because the Federal Government has used those lands for armament and nuclear testing thereby rendering many parts of the land unusable and unsuited for other uses and endangering the public health and welfare.

4. The intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States was to guarantee to each of the states sovereignty over all matters within its boundaries except for those powers specifically granted to the United States as agent of the states.
5. The attempted imposition upon the State of Nevada by the Congress of the United States of a requirement in the enabling act that Nevada “disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within said territory,” as a condition precedent to acceptance of Nevada into the Union, was an act beyond the power of the Congress of the United States and is thus void.

6. The purported right of ownership and control of the public lands within the State of Nevada by the United States is without foundation and violates the clear intent of the Constitution of the United States.

7. The exercise of such dominion and control of the public lands within the State of Nevada by the United States works a severe, continuous and debilitating hardship upon the people of the State of Nevada.

(Added to NRS by 1979, 1362)

http://law.justia.com/codes/nevada/2010/title26/chapter321/nrs321-596.html


28 posted on 04/13/2014 7:32:48 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MulberryDraw

that explains a lot about why the prices went so high


29 posted on 04/13/2014 11:33:04 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

I found the below, and apologize it’s from a save-the-horsies link, but couldn’t find it anywhere else. The drive to take back Fed lands within Nevada was active in 1996. I wonder what happened? And does this help Bundy in any way?

http://www.wildhorsespirit.org/nv_question_4_ballot_vote.htm

Also, and bear in mind I’m as dumb as lemons when it comes to law, modern-day Clark County, in 1864, was part of the Territory of Arizona’s Mohave County. Given to Nevada in 1866 to punish Arizona for siding with the Confederates, this land wasn’t gifted by the Feds until after Nevada became a state. “The Ordinance” of 1864 siezed ownership of Nevada land for the Feds, but would this additional territory of MohaveCounty/Clark County be subject to the same forfeiture ? or is this additional territory actually outside of the terms of “the Ordinance” and so belong only to Nevada?


30 posted on 04/14/2014 12:10:00 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

Amen to that.


31 posted on 04/14/2014 12:19:08 AM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

To the extent that Bundy relied on this “legislative finding” (which has the legal status of whining for more than the state originally got), it has.

From his most recent court hearing: “In sum, in this most recent effort to oppose the United States’ legal process, Bundy has produced no valid law or specific facts raising a genuine issue of fact regarding federal ownership or management of public lands in Nevada, or that his cattle
have not trespassed on the New Trespass Lands.” (http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/public_lands/grazing/pdfs/Bundy_I_Notice7-26-13.pdf)

There is a very good disposition of all of the Bundy legal claims (including the equal footing doctrine argument) here: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/12/1291572/-Does-rancher-Bundy-have-a-legal-claim-No

He’s had his bite at the legal apple. Several bites, in fact. And the Feds have shown remarkable restraint in reining in this stubborn man who simply refuses to obey the law.


32 posted on 04/14/2014 11:55:49 AM PDT by Vesparado (The American people know what they want and they deserve to get it good and hard --- HL Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Chode

How could Harry do this to a fellow Mormon?


33 posted on 04/14/2014 12:04:26 PM PDT by Little Bill (EVICT Queen Jean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
“The Chinese company eventually shelved the project in June 2013 when it failed to find a customer. The deal is over and the proposed construction will not happen.”

Isn't that convenient, just one month after Harvey Whittemore was convicted?

34 posted on 04/14/2014 12:06:58 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
How could Harry do this to a fellow Mormon?

You really had to ask that question? lol

35 posted on 04/14/2014 12:08:15 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
cause he'd do it to his own mother if he could make a penny...
36 posted on 04/14/2014 2:30:49 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson