Posted on 04/15/2014 6:19:43 PM PDT by markomalley
The Defense Department, under pressure from Congress to re-examine the way it handles sexual assault cases, announced Tuesday a comprehensive review of the entire military justice system.
“It’s been over 30 years since the military code of justice was reviewed. It’s simply time,” said Lt. Col. J. Todd Breasseale, a Pentagon spokesman. “Sexual assault will certainly be part of the compendium of issues that will be looked at, but it’s by no means the sole issue.”
Members of Congress and women’s groups have been strongly critical of how the military handles sexual assault cases, particularly the authority that military officers have to overturn the convictions of those under their command. A proposal by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., to remove the chain of command from authority over cases involving major crimes was blocked last month by a filibuster in the Senate.
At the same time, military prosecutors have recently struggled with several high-profile sexual assault cases. Last month, a military judge found a former football player at the Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., not guilty of assaulting a female classmate. On the same day, Army Brig. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sinclair escaped a prison sentence after pleading guilty to reduced charges involving his relationship with a subordinate who accused him of assaulting her.
Gillibrand was critical of the military’s move to review its justice system, noting that the panel would take a year and a half to complete its work. She said solutions were obvious now.
“We can do review after review after review — and I have no doubt they are all well-intentioned,” she said in a statement. “But according to the DOD’s latest available numbers, 18 months is another estimated 39,000 cases of unwanted sexual contact that will occur.”
Eugene Fidell, who teaches military justice at Yale University, said the review was probably prompted by the controversy over adjudication of sexual assaults in the military but that its scope would be much broader.
“As I understand it, it will be a top-to-bottom review, which means everything is on the table,” Fidell said. “I think this is part of the larger dismay that the country has been feeling about whether the system was functioning in the best way possible.”
The review panel will be headed by Andrew Effron, the recently retired chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and will include lawyers from all the military services. Judge David Sentelle, a noted conservative on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and Judith Miller, a former Defense Department general counsel under President Bill Clinton, will serve as advisers.
“I think this comes at a good time,” said Celia Richa, a policy advocate at Futures Without Violence, which frequently works to support victims of military assault. “Advocates for survivors really want to see results with this.”
Fidell said the panel would probably study not only the role of the commander in military justice, but such issues as what kinds of crimes should be prosecuted in military, as opposed to civilian, courts and whether more appeals should be sent from the military system to civilian appeals courts.
He said the panel should address a “dramatic disparity” between civilian and military defendants in their rights to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court if convicted. Most of those convicted in military courts cannot appeal to the high court, he said, only to the military appeals court.
Yup. Courtmartials for resisting homosexual advances.
Don’t tell me. Holder and Barry will want to try all military people in New Yawk from now on.
They can save a lot of time by just kicking the homos out.
Guilty until proven innocent, which will be impossible if you are a straight white male.
Homo = innocent
Muslim = innocent
white christian heterosexual = purge
The result of this study will be the creation of Soviet style political officers to ensure that commanders make decisions in line with the prevailing political fashion. This will bring Chicago and Detroit results to our uniformed services.
So yea, I’m assuming that at the least, sodomy will no longer be a no-no.
They were called commissars. I coined the term “thought control commissars” instead of using PC, it is more accurate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUdK87LWHeg
Der Kommissar’s in town, oh oh
He’s got the power and you’re so weak
And you’re frustration will not let you speak
Let me guess... it’s not heterophobic enough.
Homosexuals and lesbians and trassexuals and....and...need to be protected. Can’t leave that to the military! Times are changing...for the worse....and we must change for the worse too.
Active Duty ping.
Yep. Get ready for the zampolit, commanders.
Were these two case miscarriages of justice? Or was the "seriousness of the charge" enough to convict these guys? I don't know about the Naval Academy guy, but in the BG Sinclair case it sounded like a consensual relationship. Plus, the accuser was caught red-handed trying to hide evidence that would prove her to be a liar. Sinclair may not be fit to be in a leadership position, but he obviously doesn't deserve jail time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.