Skip to comments.86M Full-Time Private-Sector Workers Sustain 148M Benefit Takers
Posted on 04/16/2014 2:45:58 AM PDT by markomalley
Buried deep on the website of the U.S. Census Bureau is a number every American citizen, and especially those entrusted with public office, should know. It is 86,429,000.
That is the number of Americans who in 2012 got up every morning and went to work in the private sector and did it week after week after week.
These are the people who built America, and these are the people who can sustain it as a free country. The liberal media has not made them famous like the polar bear, but they are truly a threatened species.
It is not a rancher with a few hundred head of cattle that is attacking their habitat, nor an energy company developing a fossil fuel. It is big government and its primary weapon an ever-expanding welfare state.
First, let's look at the basic taxonomy of the full-time, year-round American worker.
In 2012, according to the Census Bureau, approximately 103,087,000 people worked full-time, year-round in the United States. "A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked 35 or more hours per week (full time) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year (year round)," said the Census Bureau. "For school personnel, summer vacation is counted as weeks worked if they are scheduled to return to their job in the fall."
Of the 103,087,000 full-time, year-round workers, 16,606,000 worked for the government. That included 12,597,000 who worked for state and local government and 4,009,000 who worked for the federal government.
The 86,429,000 Americans who worked full-time, year-round in the private sector, included 77,392,000 employed as wage and salary workers for private-sector enterprises and 9,037,000 who worked for themselves. (There were also approximately 52,000 who worked full-time, year-round without pay in a family enterprise.)
At first glance, 86,429,000 might seem like a healthy population of full-time private-sector workers. But then you need to look at what they are up against.
The Census Bureau also estimates the size of the benefit-receiving population.
This population, too, falls into two broad categories. The first includes those who receive benefits for public services they performed or in exchange for payroll taxes they dutifully paid their entire working lives. Among these, for example, are those receiving veteran's benefits, those on unemployment and those getting Medicare and Social Security.
The second category includes those who get "means-tested" government benefits or welfare. These include, for example, those who get Medicaid, food stamps, Supplemental Security Income, public housing, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and Women, Infants Children.
Let's examine this second category first, which the Census Bureau reports as "anyone residing in a household in which one or more people received benefits from the program."
In the last quarter of 2011, according to the Census Bureau, approximately 82,457,000 people lived in households where one or more people were on Medicaid. 49,073,000 lived in households were someone got food stamps. 23,228,000 lived in households where one or more got WIC. 20,223,000 people lived in households where one or more got SSI. 13,433,000 lived in public or government-subsidized housing.
Of course, it stands to reason that some people lived in households that received more than one welfare benefit at a time. To account for this, the Census Bureau published a neat composite statistic: There were 108,592,000 million people in the fourth quarter of 2011 who lived in a household that included people on "one or more means-tested program."
Those 108,592,000 outnumbered the 86,429,000 full-time private-sector workers who inhabited the United States in 2012 by almost 1.3 to 1.
This brings us to the first category of benefit receivers. There were 49,901,000 people receiving Social Security in the fourth quarter of 2011, and 46,440,000 receiving Medicare. There were also 5,098,000 getting unemployment compensation.
And there were also, 3,178,000 veterans receiving benefits and 34,000 veterans getting educational assistance.
All told, including both the welfare recipients and the non-welfare beneficiaries, there were 151,014,000 who "received benefits from one or more programs" in the fourth quarter of 2011. Subtract the 3,212,000 veterans, who served their country in the most profound way possible, and that leaves 147,802,000 non-veteran benefit takers.
The 147,802,000 non-veteran benefit takers outnumbered the 86,429,000 full-time private sector workers 1.7 to 1.
How much more can the 86,429,000 endure?
As more baby boomers retire, and as Obamacare comes fully online with its expanded Medicaid rolls and federally subsidized health insurance for anyone earning less than 400 percent of the poverty level the number of takers will inevitably expand. And the number of full-time private-sector workers might also contract.
Eventually, there will be too few carrying too many, and America will break.
And that should give you an idea of why they’re so interested in disarming us. The government doesn’t want their rape victims being able to resist.
“Workers” and “benefit takers” aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive categories.
“...16,606,000 worked for the government...”
Need to add them back to the total. They are in the wagon being pulled by the private sector too.
Also, we’re now calling everyone on SS a ‘taker’, despite what they’ve put into the system?
Tons of people on SS disability abusing the sysetem, as well as people collecting who never contributed a dime. So yes, you’ve contributed, but many have not.
I”m not talking about—or defending—myself. And SS disability is already accounted for differently.
(And I’m not on any sort of guv program.) I just question the math used here. Also, there’s no elimination of overlap between the SS/Medicare and the traditional means-tested programs.
I don’t agree with the fundamental diagnosis of the system, just the tally of the actual stats presented.
Thank you for pointing that out. At 68 years old, I'm in both catergories - S.S. & Medicare but I still pay a butt load of federal income tax every year, including fed taxes on my S.S., plus in the 3.5 years I've had medicare, I've yet to reach my deductible, having thus paid approximately $3500 and receiving zero benefit from Medicare. Don't get me wrong, I'm not complianing, just agreeing with your point.
“Need to add them back to the total. They are in the wagon being pulled by the private sector too.”
Absolutely, and they cost a hell of a lot more than the welfare gibsmedats. Government workers have bankrupted NJ.
It’s essential for the dictatorship to make classes of citizens angry at one another - accurately or not - in order to distract them from the people who are really responsible.
Well the title sure is scary, but after reading that out of that number of people getting benefits, they consider WIC at 23 million a horrible thing. Quite frankly since the basically give WIC to anyone who has a child, I am not as concerned as the numbers say. Had they not included the numbers from WIC, it would have been horrible for the country.
ack! It gets worse. The include people getting Social Security and then they include Veterans getting pensions and GI Bill. What a crock of an article. It is a “BS” scary story that is definitely sensationalism crap that we would explode had the liberals been so dishonest.
Tons of people on SS disability abusing the sysetem, as well as people collecting who never contributed a dime. So yes, youve contributed, but many have not.
Then only include those getting SSI in the numbers. The numbers are so bull crap that I thought this horrid story was from the liberal website (take your pick). I would pull this thread as it is basically bunk.
“Also, were now calling everyone on SS a taker, despite what theyve put into the system?”
There lies the brainwashing: “Pay into it, collect back, you’ve ‘earned’ it.”
The fact is, you will always take more than you put in.
This will end in blood and fire ...
Actually, the average is to take out more than put in—but lots of people croak before coming even.
Medicare is something else, however, with the vast majority taking out way more than they put in.
A significant fraction are employed to hand out money to the gibsmedats. Get rid of the gibsmedat programs, and you produce a twofold benefit.
I don’t even need to call the actuary in the family to know THAT is not sustainable.
Calling them an epitat may reasonably be taken exception to, and one can argue that they have justification for their place, but at this moment, they are part of that category of taking which must be supported by a worker/producer. As the ratios continue to shift, it becomes more and more unsustainable.
Who is John Galt?