Skip to comments.Feds Provoke Range War Over Fees And A Turtle
Posted on 04/16/2014 6:45:27 AM PDT by Kaslin
Gopherus agassizii is the binomial name given to the desert tortoise, a roughly foot-long creature with a lifespan that can stretch to more than half-a-century. This turtle inhabits the Mojave Desert in Americas great southwest. On paper, the desert tortoise seems an innocuous amphibian; however, it has the curious attribute of being able provoke nearly open warfare between U.S. citizens and the federal government.
The notion of a range war may harken back to the days of the American cowboy riding the fence each morning and protecting his homestead from attack. Yet, last week the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM), acting on behalf of a court order to seize cattle from Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy because Uncle Sam claimed he owed $1-million in unpaid grazing fees, launched an armed action against Bundy, his family and friends from across the area. The government also asserted with a straight face that such action was justified because Bundys cattle threatened the habitat of the endangered desert tortoise.
Those grazing fees, which the government claims have accumulated by Bundy over a two-decade period during which time he allowed his cattle to graze on lands managed by BLM, represent just 0.1 percent of the BLMs annual budget. Yet, the government deemed the amount sufficient to justify seizing Bundys cattle and confronting Bundy and other ranchers who rallied to his cause, with automatic weapons, attack dogs, and snipers.
The magnitude of the governments actions in confronting a rancher over an alleged unpaid bill was truly breathtaking. Even the FAA the Federal Aviation Administration got into the act; declaring the scrub brush area in which the confrontation occurred to be a no-fly zone, apparently to keep prying news media helicopters away in the event the confrontation escalated into open violence.
Fears of another violent and deadly confrontation such as occurred 20 years ago at the Branch Davidian compound outside Waco, Texas, were not without foundation. A lengthy series of congressional hearings in 1995 (in which I participated) examined in detail the circumstances before, during and after the Waco tragedy in which federal agents, deploying military equipment, stormed the Branch Davidian compound and ignited a horrific fire that took the lives of some six dozen men, women, children and infants. We saw how what should have been and easily could have been a dispute peaceably resolved, escalate into a massive tragedy because of ego, bureaucratic snafus, predisposition to use force, and an unwillingness to admit error. Many of the same ingredients appeared present last week in Nevada.
While the risk of violence has thankfully subsided (at least for the moment), important questions remain.
Why did the federal government jeopardize the lives of its own employees and of many innocent civilians, simply to protect a turtle and to collect on an outstanding (and disputed) grazing bill?
The Bundy Ranch debacle also raises serious questions about this Administrations control of its own agencies. Was the BLM so scared of a single rancher who (perhaps rightfully) questioned the federal governments authority on an issue best left to the state itself, that it decided the only course of action open to it was to surround his ranch with armed agents from multiple agencies? Were there not other options for enforcement of these fees? Are turtles that might be living in the area so important to our country that we should risk killing civilians over them?
Instead of resolving this in a peaceful way; instead of docketing his property with a judgment, Judge Andrew Napolitano argued on FOX Business this week, they swooped in. . . with assault rifles aimed and ready, and stole [Bundys] property.
Even worse than apparent violations of Bundys due process rights, the BLMs actions are another alarming sign that the constitutional rights --and lives -- of U.S. citizens are considered expendable when balanced against the governments need to enforce control over land and citizens.
Given that the federal government owns more than 80 percent of the land within the state of Nevada, the standoff at Bundy Ranch may very well be far from over; especially if we are to take Nevadas Democratic Senator Harry Reid at his word. Its not over, Reid ominously told reporters after the BLMs tactical retreat. We cant have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So its not over.
That is precisely why an official congressional inquiry into the BLMs handling of the case, as well as Senator Reids curious involvement, is needed immediately if we are to prevent future potentially deadly situations from occurring the next time the BLM or any of the other dozens of federal bureaucracies whose employees are authorized to carry and use weapons against civilians -- decides someone owes it money.
We might also wonder why a U.S. President appears so ready to risk violence between its agents and its citizens, when he seems so hesitant to risk confrontation when defending our security interests abroad.
Bob, actually, you’ve fallen for the BLM story. This was about money and power, and the grifting of a US Senator and his relative. The BLM was just the means.
Ahem...turtles are reptiles, not amphibians.
And solar panels. Don't forget the solar panels.
Speaking of owing taxes, has Obama BFF, Warren Buffett, made good on that billion dollars Berkshire-Hathaway has owed the government for over a decade?
Aha! So is Reid admitting Preezy Pajama Boy is not American?
“Ahem...turtles are reptiles, not amphibians.”
So are politicians...
It is becoming very annoying to me to hear these people say “we can’t have citizens breaking the law...” when the entire crime family in Wash DC (Read: all three branches of government) either exempts themselves, ignores the laws they pass, or interprets said laws for political benefit.
Didn’t we nuke that place for a few years?
AND....it's a tortoise, not a 'turtle'..................and a 'DESERT' tortoise at that.................
Wouldn't those hired rustlers, paramilitary gear-bedecked thugs, and all their equipment be far more useful on our country's borders?
The turtle seems perfectly adapted to having cattle grazing there.
Did Sharpton? As I seem to vaguely recall, he owes more than a million but is being seen openly in public unhounded and laughing it up with 0butthurt as recently as a few days ago.
The investigation should be into Harry Reid not the BLM. Oh wait there was an investigation of Harry Reid but Eric Holder called it off a couple of weeks ago.
REIDGate...pass it around
Rory Reid had a deal with the Chinese solar power company for some land that had the turtles.
More “turtle land” was needed to “offset” what was being sold to the Chinese.
Bundy’s grazing land was that “offset”.
I agree, it was never about a damn turtle, or any other verminous critter.
This is about oil, money, and power.
And Disgusting Harry's appetites.
Less than 400 miles away, as the crow flies, Calif is threatening to euthanize desert turtles because ‘they don’t have enough budget to take care of them’.
Seems to me the turtles—which have survived since the dinosaurs, do a pretty good job of taking care of themselves if the Feds would stay out of things.
How about all the tax money Charlie Rangel owes the USA?
Is Holder giving his a pass, also??
Mr. Barr has his premise wrong. No one in government wants to prevent this at all.
Imagine that. Fed overkill with, no doubt local police support.
Rangle is a brotha of good standing. That is to say, he's a DemocRAT.
If Allen West or Tim Scott was a tax cheat on the order of Charles Rangel, those guys would already be in shackles and the hyenas in the Men Seeking Men media would be fitting Eric Holder for a crown of righteousness.