Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JW Obtains IRS Docs Showing Lerner in Contact With DOJ about Prosecution of Tax-Exempt Groups
Judicial Watch ^ | 4-16-2014

Posted on 04/16/2014 9:27:11 AM PDT by smoothsailing

JW Obtains IRS Documents Showing Lerner in Contact With DOJ about Potential Prosecution of Tax-Exempt Groups

APRIL 16, 2014

May 9, 2013, email reveals IRS plans to meet with Department of Justice over whether to prosecute groups that “lied” about plans for political activity

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released a new batch of internal IRS documents revealing that former IRS official Lois Lerner communicated with the Department of Justice (DOJ) about whether it was possible to criminally prosecute certain tax-exempt entities. The documents were obtained as a result of an October 2013 Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) after the agency refused to respond to four FOIA requests dating back to May 2013.

The newly released IRS documents contain an email exchange between Lerner and Nikole C. Flax, then-Chief of Staff to then-Acting IRS Commissioner Steven T. Miller discussing plans to work with the DOJ to prosecute nonprofit groups that “lied” (Lerner’s quotation marks) about political activities. The exchange includes the following:

I got a call today from Richard Pilger Director Elections Crimes Branch at DOJ … He wanted to know who at IRS the DOJ folk s [sic] could talk to about Sen. Whitehouse idea at the hearing that DOJ could piece together false statement cases about applicants who “lied” on their 1024s –saying they weren’t planning on doing political activity, and then turning around and making large visible political expenditures. DOJ is feeling like it needs to respond, but want to talk to the right folks at IRS to see whether there are impediments from our side and what, if any damage this might do to IRS programs.

I told him that sounded like we might need several folks from IRS…

I think we should do it – also need to include CI [Criminal Investigation Division], which we can help coordinate. Also, we need to reach out to FEC. Does it make sense to consider including them in this or keep it separate?

Lerner then “handed off” scheduling the issue to Senior Technical Adviser, Attorney Nancy Marks, who was then supposed to set up the meeting with the DOJ. Lerner also decided that it would be DOJ’s decision as to whether representatives from the Federal Election Commission would attend.

Democratic Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse had held a hearing on April 9during which, “in questioning the witnesses from DOJ and IRS, Whitehouse asked why they have not prosecuted 501(c)(4) groups that have seemingly made false statements about their political activities.” Lerner described the impetus for this hearing in a March 27, 2013, email to top IRS staff:

As I mentioned yesterday — there are several groups of folks from the FEC world that are pushing tax fraud prosecution for c4s who report they are not conducting political activity when they are (or these folks think they are). One is my ex-boss Larry Noble (former General Counsel at the FEC), who is now president of Americans for Campaign Reform. This is their latest push to shut these down. One IRS prosecution would make an impact and they wouldn’t feel so comfortable doing the stuff.

So, don’t be fooled about how this is being articulated – it is ALL about 501(c)(4) orgs and political activity

But in an email sent a few minutes earlier, Lerner acknowledged prosecutions would evidently be at odds with the law:

Whether there was a false statement or fraud regarding an [sic] description of an alleged political expenditure that doesn’t say vote for or vote against is not realistic under current law. Everyone is looking for a magic bullet or scapegoat — there isn’t one. The law in this area is just hard.

The documents also include email exchanges showing that before Lerner’s May 10, 2013, speech to the American Bar Association blaming “low-level” employees in Cincinnati for targeting tax-exempt organizations, the IRS Exempt Organizations division was scrambling to defuse the emerging targeting scandal:

The new documents obtained by Judicial Watch also include emails exchanged after Lerner’s May 10 ABA speech:

The Judicial Watch FOIA requests came on the heels of an explosive May 14, 2013, Treasury Inspector General report revealing that the IRS had singled out groups with conservative-sounding terms such as “patriot” and “Tea Party” in their titles when applying for tax-exempt status. The IG probe determined that “Early in Calendar Year 2010, the IRS began using inappropriate criteria to identify organizations applying for tax-exempt status to (e.g., lists of past and future donors).” According to the report, the illegal IRS reviews continued for more than 18 months and “delayed processing of targeted groups’ applications” preparing for the 2012 presidential election.

Lerner, who headed the IRS division that handles applications for tax-exempt status, refused to testify at a May 2013 hearing before Rep. Darrell Issa’s (R-CA) House Oversight Committee, demanding immunity concerning her role in the targeting scandal. Lerner retired from the IRS with full benefits on September 23 after an internal investigation found she was guilty of “neglect of duties” and was going to call for her ouster, according to news reports. On April 9, 2014, the Ways and Means Committee referred Lois Lerner to the DOJ for criminal prosecution. On April 10, 2014, the House Oversight Committee voted to hold Lerner in contempt of Congress.

“These new emails show that the day before she broke the news of the IRS scandal, Lois Lerner was talking to a top Obama Justice Department official about whether the DOJ could prosecute the very same organizations that the IRS had already improperly targeted,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The IRS emails show Eric Holder’s Department of Justice is now implicated and conflicted in the IRS scandal. No wonder we had to sue in federal court to get these documents.”



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corruptholder; doj; ericholder; gettherope; holder; impeachholder; impeachnow; irs; irsteapartyscandal; loislearner; loislerner; loislerneremails

Miss Lois, you ain't nuttin' but trouble...

 photo 2cf57a4f-0e42-492c-b849-f013cbda77a5_zps7d06320f.gif

1 posted on 04/16/2014 9:27:11 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

A woman who needs an INDICTMENT real bad!


2 posted on 04/16/2014 9:29:35 AM PDT by high info voter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Which route will Lois take?

The Susan McDougal route?

Or the Vince Foster route?

3 posted on 04/16/2014 9:30:19 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The best way to control opposition is to lead it ourselves." -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; null and void; Nachum; LucyT; WildHighlander57; maggief

The TRUTH will win!
Lois really needs to save her own hide and turn states evidence. /s


4 posted on 04/16/2014 9:32:33 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

PERFECT! Thanks!


5 posted on 04/16/2014 9:36:27 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Even a white collar federal prison is too lenient for Lerner.


6 posted on 04/16/2014 9:36:33 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Nixon was Impeached for less.

Pure lawlessness


7 posted on 04/16/2014 9:41:18 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45 (Americans, happy in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own dictators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

This explains they the IRS wanted an absurd amount of info from the groups; it is also now : ‘ IRS Conspired withe the Obama Justice Department to deny conservative groups their Civil rights.’


8 posted on 04/16/2014 9:41:34 AM PDT by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; bitt; 2ndDivisionVet; Uncle Chip; Liz; kristinn
"The IRS emails show Eric Holder’s Department of Justice is now implicated and conflicted in the IRS scandal. No wonder we had to sue in federal court to get these documents.”

Get the word out

9 posted on 04/16/2014 9:43:51 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Tough call. Take the slight risk jail time at the hands of the toothless republicans, or certain death at the hands of the likes of obama, VayJay and Holder?


10 posted on 04/16/2014 9:44:29 AM PDT by null and void (The British declared war on the Tea Party. The Tea Party won! (Thanks mom!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: smoothsailing

The DOJ is obviously involved in the illegal activity, they can’t be trusted to investigate themselves.

Time for a special prosecutor to be appointed by Congress or the courts.


12 posted on 04/16/2014 9:51:55 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Lerner directly affected the election with targeting conservative groups. She should be given free admission to the Crowbar Hotel with fresh linens.


13 posted on 04/16/2014 9:53:43 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Lerner acknowledged prosecutions would evidently be at odds with the law:

Seems Lerner knew the law was too "hard" to prosecute but the law didn't slow her down a bit. To heck with law, the RATS wanted to prosecute Tea Party Patriots.

14 posted on 04/16/2014 9:58:26 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

NIXON WAS NOT IMPEACHED !!!


15 posted on 04/16/2014 9:59:31 AM PDT by al baby (Hi MomÂ… I was refereeing to Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bulwinkle

The Dems say the Tea Party exempt groups lied. It’s as if those Cs on the Left have done no wrong. What they cannot deal with is competition of messages.
I only wish heads would roll over this, but I deal with reality. They will stall until the storm passes.


16 posted on 04/16/2014 10:02:56 AM PDT by griswold3 ("Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer

Bump For Later...


17 posted on 04/16/2014 10:14:39 AM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the mooslimbs trying to kill them-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
 photo 73068b31-5408-4278-ae8d-70e80dd73466_zpsca68631c.jpg
18 posted on 04/16/2014 10:26:20 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

“Lois really needs to save her own hide and turn states evidence. /s”

I could be wrong, but after her 5th fiasco, she tried to ask for immunity for testimony, but the committee laughed at it.


19 posted on 04/16/2014 10:34:18 AM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Noamie

In that case they have the good not just on her but on others involved.


20 posted on 04/16/2014 10:39:46 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

DOJ CALLED Lois Lerner... Obama’s Department of Justice sought to conspire with IRS to deny Civil Rights of conservatives.

I got it backwards on my earlier post...


21 posted on 04/16/2014 10:41:17 AM PDT by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Nixon was not impeached...he resigned, but for less,you are quite correct.


22 posted on 04/16/2014 10:48:29 AM PDT by georgia peach (georgia peach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Time for heads to roll at the doj

It coming up on fox next!


23 posted on 04/16/2014 10:51:29 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

So when the hell are we going to rid ourselves of this miserable and out of control agency of tyranny?

TAXES AND A CIVILIZED SOCIETY
4 ½ minute video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmYXEwbK1k0&list=UUFDlhK80EdO28R-iGTXiGaw


24 posted on 04/16/2014 11:30:46 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
I believe impeachment charges were in preparation for Nixon. There hadn't yet been a House vote on the Articles.

And Nixon knew the Democrat-controlled Senate would find him guilty.

25 posted on 04/16/2014 11:49:12 AM PDT by eCSMaster ("It is not the color of his skin, ... it is the blackness that fills his soul")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

He stepped down because he loss the support of his fellow republicans
All the Rats do is make excuses for 0 and crew !


26 posted on 04/16/2014 12:38:12 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Time to get Richard Pilger's e-mails and find out who else he talked to about this.
Eric, buddy, we do want to go there!
27 posted on 04/16/2014 2:04:51 PM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Maybe the Jim McDougal route?


28 posted on 04/17/2014 4:16:38 AM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson