Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donít let Big Tobacco hook a new generation on nicotine with alluring ads for e-cigarettes
Wash Post ^ | April 16, '14 | Robert McCartney

Posted on 04/16/2014 4:08:52 PM PDT by Drango

The tobacco industry is sharply raising spending on advertisements and other marketing for electronic cigarettes to try to make smoking glamorous again and hook a new generation of Americans on nicotine.

If adults choose to “vape” — inhale nicotine-laced vapor from battery-powered e-cigarettes — then they should be free to do so.

~snip

Public health authorities are especially worried about such ads’ effect on teens. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that from 2011 to 2012, the percentage of high school students who have tried e-cigarettes more than doubled to 10 percent.

“It is frankly appalling,” said CDC Director Tom Frieden. “Nicotine is highly addictive. If kids have more access to nicotine, they are quite likely to have a lifetime addiction to tobacco products, including cigarettes.”

~snip

“The second coming of tobacco marketing is pouring millions into adland,” Advertising Age reported. ~snip

Promoting e-cigarettes also risks encouraging smoking, in general. Some current smokers will be less inclined to quit if they can vape in places where combustibles are banned.

Furthermore, the CDC was unhappy to find that many former smokers are now using e-cigarettes.

“We are very concerned that under the guise of reducing harm, [e-cigarettes] will actually increase smoking,” Frieden said.

Still, the biggest concern about e-cigarettes is the young. Researchers have established that nicotine damages adolescent brain development, and that teens are more vulnerable than adults to getting addicted.

The FDA should impose a nationwide ban on selling e-cigarettes to people younger than 18. More than half the states, including Maryland and Virginia, have some form of age limit already. But other states and the District do not. ~snip

Vape if you want. That’s your business.

But don’t give tobacco companies free rein to profit by manipulating the public’s mind and jeopardizing its health.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: tobacconazis
Vapids trying to extend their reach to the next generation.
1 posted on 04/16/2014 4:08:52 PM PDT by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Drango
The FDA needs to be disassembled and removed. The feds have no authority under Art 1, Sec 8 of the Constitution to regulate Food or Drugs.

/johnny

2 posted on 04/16/2014 4:11:43 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

It’s for the children. We just don’t know how to tax it yet to pay for children’s programs.


3 posted on 04/16/2014 4:13:36 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
"We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical. We control what you eat, what you breathe..."

Seeking The Outer Limits of control, for the childrun.

4 posted on 04/16/2014 4:22:39 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

“Some current smokers will be less inclined to quit if they can vape in places where combustibles are banned.”

This misleading and nonsensical statement shows that this is all about social control, and not about protecting health.

Vaping is not smoking (no combustion involved, and hence no harmful products of combustion). If a current smoker switches completely to vaping from smoking (and many do), then they have quit smoking, even though they are still dosing themselves with nicotine.


5 posted on 04/16/2014 4:31:58 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Haven’t heard of the need to reduce the allure of marijuana to “a new generation”. Politicians are talking about legalization as a way to lure a new generation of voters to the polls (as if no other issue matters to them, especially the national debt that they will inherit).


6 posted on 04/16/2014 4:33:15 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Considering that the majority of adult Americans are ignoramuses who voted Democrat, one must conclude that their children will also be ignoramuses and Democrats when they reach adulthood (e.g. the generation of entitlement). So, let them smoke.


7 posted on 04/16/2014 4:33:28 PM PDT by fivecatsandadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Ah, the NWO/CIA’s WaPo wants to tell us that

a) we aren’t allowed to smoke real tobacco
b) we can be naughty and smoke their chemicals
c) it’s naughty for kids to smoke their chemicals. note to kids, it’s cool to smoke new world order chemicals, but not real tobacco
d) pot is fine
e) they know some people will smoke real tobacco anyway, which allows NWO to classify those people as criminals
f) keep working, paying interest, taxes and fines
g) do as NWO tells you


8 posted on 04/16/2014 4:41:20 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fivecatsandadog

The issue here is actually taxes.

Cigarettes are very heavily taxed at both the state and federal level. The E-smokes are not taxed. So if smokers all switch to the electronic versions the taxes disappear.

It has nothing to do with safety, it has to do with not having as much dosh to bribe lo-fo constituents and actually having less control over people’s lives

This is the same reason that many environmentalist don’t like bicycles. A bike gives you freedom to go where you want, like a car but slower. A bus or subway means you can be tracked and only go where the system takes you.


9 posted on 04/16/2014 4:47:21 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Simplified:

Anything that the individual does by him(her)self that they enjoy, or provides them with fulfillment, must be eradicated. Nothing is valid or allowed unless it is sanctioned and controlled by the collective.


10 posted on 04/16/2014 4:51:25 PM PDT by bakeneko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Drango

In the end totalitarians lose and lose badly. ;-)


11 posted on 04/16/2014 5:05:00 PM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

I can’t “vap” because they can’t vaporize a good Dominican cigar.


12 posted on 04/16/2014 5:05:22 PM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bakeneko
Yah. and speech, writing and thought.

Eat your synthetic food and like it !



then when we run out of slime, or you get sick...


13 posted on 04/16/2014 5:10:42 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Would Vaping pot be approved then...seems like its the only smokeable product hedonists like.


14 posted on 04/16/2014 5:11:24 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

“Big Tobacco” hates ecigs as much as “Big Pharma”. The nicotine in the e-juice can be sourced from many plants, not just tobacco. It is a threat to both of their interests.
As a Registered Respiratory Therapist, I have seen many of my patients (and myself) get off tobacco and taper down to zero nicotine using ecigs. Other methods may be preferable in one way or another but this works for many that have been unable to kick the habit in other ways.


15 posted on 04/16/2014 5:50:30 PM PDT by Uriah_lost (Is there no balm in Gilead?....MiE (Mainer in Exile))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears

bfl


16 posted on 04/16/2014 5:54:04 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic
It’s for the children. We just don’t know how to tax it yet to pay for children’s programs.

These arrogant incompetent don't ever have to prove anything scientifically. The feel entitled to simply "proclaim" a scientific truth.

If the ecigs contain ZERO nicotine, can they still tax it?

They are flummoxed by their science ignorance.

Their bottom line is simply ways to tax more without ever having to justify its legality.

17 posted on 04/16/2014 6:26:09 PM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
"We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical. We control what you eat, what you breathe..."

"In the year 2525
If man is still alive..."

18 posted on 04/16/2014 6:28:34 PM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RginTN

I’m sure big tobacco has plans for the marijuana market.


19 posted on 04/16/2014 6:47:53 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
I’m sure big tobacco has plans for the marijuana market.

Not nearly as big as the plans from the Federal, State and local taxmen...

20 posted on 04/16/2014 7:21:48 PM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

My granddaughter, who will be a freshman next year, and I had a talk last week. She was telling me about all the ‘stoners’ at her school. This is an upper middle class junior high. Haven’t heard anything anywhere about this epidemic, except from her.


21 posted on 04/16/2014 7:23:19 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Moronic. A pack-a-day smoker spends $5/day ($13 in NYC), $150/month, $1800/year. An e-cig smoker spends $30 about 4 times a year for the cig itself, and about $8 per bottle of oil, which lasts for about a week or so... (4 x 30) + (8 x 52)... that’s $120 + $416 = $536 per year, instead of $1800 per year. Why on earth would any “big evil corporation” work to cut their revenues by 2/3?


22 posted on 04/16/2014 7:26:24 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RginTN
Would Vaping pot be approved then...seems like its the only smokeable product hedonists like.

Vaping oils that contain THC (the active ingredient in marijuana) are already being made.

23 posted on 04/16/2014 7:33:13 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: publius911

The liberals assume that Soylent Green made from smokers will have to be sold at a loss by the government because it won’t taste as good.

I, however, figure it will get a premium price for it’s nicotine content.


24 posted on 04/16/2014 7:59:37 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Uriah_lost

I have not had a cigarette since October. Vaping has really helped me. I have tried patches gum you name it without success, but vaping has. I can even vape in the office. I am tapering my nicotine content. I was at 18 now I am down to 12.


25 posted on 04/16/2014 8:01:11 PM PDT by waxer1 (A Republic if you can keep it--Benjamin Franklin. Well we lost it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Drango

The FDA - Federal Drugged Agency. Another agency that needs to be disbanded. The FDA should go into the Department of Commerce.


26 posted on 04/16/2014 8:15:49 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton

LOL. That’s true.


27 posted on 04/16/2014 8:18:02 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: waxer1
Way to go! Sadly, i get a lot of resistance from my colleagues because they only listen to the drug reps and medical establishment types
28 posted on 04/19/2014 6:22:18 PM PDT by Uriah_lost (Is there no balm in Gilead?....MiE (Mainer in Exile))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson