Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colo. eminent domain case settled with $115,000 sale
FoxNews.com ^ | April 16, 2014 | By Faith Mangan

Posted on 04/16/2014 6:38:46 PM PDT by saywhatagain

Andy Barrie recently held a property rights seminar for landowners. Asked what lessons they shared, Ceil Barrie said with teary eyes, "Yeah, don't annoy the government."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: colorado; corruption; eminentdomain; envirowackos; landgrab
Another one bites the dust
1 posted on 04/16/2014 6:38:47 PM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

I’d run for office and then take the peoples homes who were behind this. At the least.


2 posted on 04/16/2014 6:41:11 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain
Breckenridge, Colo. - A contentious eminent domain case in which a local government sought to take private backcountry land for open space has been settled, with the landowners agreeing to a $115,000 sale.

"To me, what just came out of it is, you can't win, you can't fight the government," landowner Ceil Barrie said Wednesday.

She and her husband, Andy, owned ten acres of land perched at 11,000 feet elevation in Breckenridge. The property, with breathtaking views, was a private patch of land surrounded by White River National Forest.

An old, uninhabited day-use cabin, an outhouse and a shuttered gold mine sit on it. The Barries’ legal troubles began when they worked to access their personal paradise with a utility vehicle. They traveled on an old mining road dating back to the 1880s and said the county did not even know about the road until they made them aware of it.

The county asked to buy the land, but the Barries did not want to part with their piece of "Colorado heaven."

So Summit County condemned it, filed for eminent domain and petitioned for immediate possession.

3 posted on 04/16/2014 6:42:33 PM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

At a bare minimum, I’d leave behind a stack of leaking car batteries and broken mercury thermometers ... and a flaming pile of old tires. It would be a long time before anyone called it the White River National Forest again.


4 posted on 04/16/2014 6:46:00 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

IMHO this is a much more outrageous case than the Bundy ranch situation. These people didn’t owe the government money, and did nothing to give them any kind of claim to take their property. Just greedy government and eco-Nazis teaming up to rip off honest citizens.


5 posted on 04/16/2014 6:46:12 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

They had a crap or collusive lawyer to lose that.

Also, they should have kept their mouth shut about the road, though if it was through the national forest they could claim it was utilized as a prospecting road.


6 posted on 04/16/2014 6:46:15 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Ya see, the first bureaucrat that raises a stink in a case like this, needs a baseball bat upside the head.

EPA, BLM, IRS, HHS,.....Just to let them know that there’s a price for their utter stupidity. That would slow down some of this nonsense.

And....even if it resulted in a ban on baseball bats....there are an infinite number of substitutes, so as to make the ban irrelevant.


7 posted on 04/16/2014 6:47:14 PM PDT by G Larry (There's the Beef!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Eminent domain can only be used to acquire land for a public need. And you have to be paid fair compensation for what the government wants.


8 posted on 04/16/2014 6:48:15 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Remember Kelo?

They can take your property for a K-Mart because it pays more tax, according to SCOTUS


9 posted on 04/16/2014 6:51:30 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

As government gets fat and more arrogant, what it is willing to call a “need” grows beyond credulity.


10 posted on 04/16/2014 6:53:38 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

My cousin lives on the edge of a national forest in Arkansas. There are roads all through it. He drives back there all the time. They allow no atvs but horses and trucks are just fine. I don’t get it either.


11 posted on 04/16/2014 6:54:07 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Because the Federal Govmint doesn’t own enough western states land, apparently.


12 posted on 04/16/2014 6:56:40 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheana

This is Colorado where the leftists control a lot of local governments and the Governorship.

Time for more recalls, more challenges to asshole judges (at least this guy was honest about the situation), and more candidates for local government positions who espouse property rights. Should run on the “Sanity Party” ticket.


13 posted on 04/16/2014 7:00:09 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

It would be interesting to follow this story into the future to see just what does happen to that property Summit County just stole from the Barrie family.

I’d bet someone of the Summit County elite will end up with it, either by purchase, or some form of lease.


14 posted on 04/16/2014 7:01:17 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

I know Breckenridge well since I have family living there. The sad truth is that this is like a poor man’s Vail. It is ski town and tourism runs the businesses. Many sandal wearing 60s types moved into the area years ago and managed to build up their influence in the local political scene. Remember that South Park (the cartoon) is based on Breckenridge and you will understand exactly how this happened


15 posted on 04/16/2014 7:03:59 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

What if I was willing to pay the tax the Gov expects to receive? Then what is the basis for the taking? This goes against all the logic of private property ownership - but what if??


16 posted on 04/16/2014 7:11:57 PM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
Yup, we saw how many of those sandal wearing hippies turned out.

Acting out all their bitterness against folks who had nothing to do with their childhood anger problems.

17 posted on 04/16/2014 7:12:41 PM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Eminent domain can only be used to acquire land for a public need. And you have to be paid fair compensation for what the government wants.

That's what we learned in school. That's not how it works anymore in our Brave New World.

The breauracry will just out lawyer you with taxpayer money and keep it going until they find the 'right judge' who wants to get promoted to a life-time federal job.

Boss Tweed was a small-time hustler compared to these big-time breaucratic thieves we suffer through today.

18 posted on 04/16/2014 7:20:20 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Lesson here is don’t tell the gubmint bout nothin.


19 posted on 04/16/2014 7:34:13 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Now we should tell people “on our
side” who sided with big government
against Bundy what is at stake.

But they won’t listen.


20 posted on 04/16/2014 7:47:39 PM PDT by WKTimpco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I don’t mind the government taking property that they need for whatever reason. However, I believe they should have to pay 3 times the assessed value of the property before they get it.


21 posted on 04/16/2014 7:55:50 PM PDT by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Does a government employee assess the value?


22 posted on 04/16/2014 8:12:24 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

They were forced to sell it to the County (the County with quite a few ski resorts). According to radio news, they had spent around $80,000 in legal fees. With that and whatever they’d put into the land, they lost quite a bit. Regulations in even some of the most sparsely populated counties on the CO Rockies reflect those of the area many of the people came from: the northeastern states (some after moving to CA first, many more moved directly to CO).


23 posted on 04/16/2014 8:22:28 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

Also according to the radio report, Summit County may trade the property to the Forest Service for another piece of land that’s closer to the ski resort.


24 posted on 04/16/2014 8:29:29 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

That’s Breckenridge, BTW.


25 posted on 04/16/2014 8:29:53 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

I just hope they kept the mineral rights. There is an old mine on the property, and maybe someone decided it is worth something.


26 posted on 04/16/2014 8:32:01 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: saywhatagain

They are going after anything in wilderness or less developed areas. This is by design in controlling population imho. Since they have identified law abiding American citizens as “terrorists” because they have guns and enjoy living off the land... they need to curtail the opportunity for this to survive.


27 posted on 04/16/2014 8:43:38 PM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Lord, forgive us our sins and bring us to everlasting life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson