Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, IQ Really Matters
Slate ^ | 4/16/14 | David Z. Hambrick and Christopher Chabris

Posted on 04/18/2014 3:45:02 AM PDT by Altura Ct.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: Timber Rattler
"That's not necessarily true."

But it is generally true, and it being generally true makes the test worthwhile.

How is an SAT "subjective"?! Any measure uniformly applied is the definition of objective. We could argue about the usefulness of the data being measured but that doesn't make it subjective measurement.

61 posted on 04/18/2014 6:15:06 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
The SAT is a solid predictor of college success.

So a compromised test serves as a predictor for success in a dumbed-down college? No surprises there...

62 posted on 04/18/2014 7:01:50 AM PDT by The Duke ("Forgiveness is between them and God, it's my job to arrange the meeting.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

"Oh, and over-achiever eh!?"


63 posted on 04/18/2014 7:05:28 AM PDT by The Duke ("Forgiveness is between them and God, it's my job to arrange the meeting.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Duke

Larry: “You know, fish is great brain food.”
Moe: “You know, you should fish for a whale!” *SLAP*


64 posted on 04/18/2014 7:07:28 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
The problem is that high school grades are so variable from school to school (and even from track to track) that they generally have lost any value as a predictor. Even back in the 70s, my husband saw folks who were valedictorians of their small rural high school, with a 4.0 average, flame out of Georgia Tech in one quarter. He went to a good quality public school in VA, did not do prep and took the test only once. His SAT verbal scores weren't all that great, but he had an 800 on the math and he did just fine at Tech.

AP test scores are definitely a good indicator, although they are focused on detailed knowledge of one subject rather than general verbal and math ability.

I got a 1598 on the SAT back in the days before they began revising the thing. My daughter got a perfect 2400 (after 3 tries and some tutoring to bring up her 780 math score). We definitely employed a "playing the system" approach, but the whole goal of our high school was to get everybody into the college of their choice. And to equip you to manage when you got there. Absolutely a "prep school" for the college bound, not a general high school.

I would like to see a "two-track" system restored, or a "three track" system: a college prep track, a general business/tech school track, and a babysitting service for kids who do not care to learn and disrupt those who do. But that will NEVER happen - too many people cringe at the idea of admitting that some kids are better equipped to learn than others (whether from native intelligence, hard work, or determination).

65 posted on 04/18/2014 7:09:57 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
I’ve taken and passed both the SAT and the GRE, and in neither case did each have any bearing whatsoever on my college and post-graduate success. I just busted my butt to pass them, and that was about it. Worthless.

Umm, they showed that you can and will study hard, that you can communicate effectively enough for the university setting, that you are adept at test-taking, and they allowed the schools to compare approximately how well you do at such tasks compared to a few million other applicants. It helps them sort out who might be more likely to succeed at their schools. A 700 SAT, a 1500 SAT, and a 2300 SAT score all indicate VERY different things about those 3 students. No indicators are perfect or 100% accurate, but these tests are good enough to help schools make their choices.

66 posted on 04/18/2014 7:16:51 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
The test has definitely been made simpler.

I recall all too well my prep back in the early 70s, and I helped my daughter prep in the early 2000s. I probably took the test 6 times total, once in sophomore year, twice junior year, and three times senior year. Since college apps have been sped up in the intervening time, so that you apply and receive a decision sooner, my daughter took it 5 times total, mostly in her junior year.

The math in particular is much easier overall, I think they have just moved calculus to the AP altogether. Verbal has I think fewer problems to a section and they are not as complex, particularly the reading comprehension. There's a "luck of the draw" factor because there are 5 sections, so you may have more verbal (which I prayed for). Also, one section is usually a "test drive" of new problems and doesn't count towards your score. My best score was the test where I got 3 verbal and 1 of the math sections was new problems and didn't count. :-)

67 posted on 04/18/2014 7:17:11 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks Altura Ct.

Unbelievable: Common Core Problem Asks Kids to Choose Two Amendments to Remove From Bill of Rights
IJReview | 03/31/2014 | Emily Hulsey
Posted on 03/31/2014 1:58:10 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3139419/posts


68 posted on 04/18/2014 7:21:17 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: babble-on
The SAT is a lousy predictor of success in anything. I should know, I aced the SAT!

It predicted that you are highly adept at test-taking. Nothing more, nothing less. As for success on campus or in the business world, that is entirely different, and the tests are much more subtle.

69 posted on 04/18/2014 7:22:06 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Exactly. My son has more native intelligence than my daughter, but he is simply not interested in college AT ALL. We found him a small private school where they taught practical knowledge (business math, reading for content, time management, hands-on stuff like carpentry as well as extensive athletic programs). He is happier working with his hands and being outdoors, where he uses his intelligence to be the best U.S. Marine riflery instructor that he can be. He has a little gunsmithing business on the side and is doing well.

My daughter is a hard worker and highly motivated. She took a biology degree at a top-tier small college and is a curator in the rain forest of a science museum. She is likewise happy and doing well - which is what we want for the kids, after all.

70 posted on 04/18/2014 7:25:08 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
If they dumb it down much more it will be fairly useless for the top-tier schools. The problem is of course compression on the upper end of the test, so that you can't sort out the extremely bright from the very bright and the merely bright.

As it stood in 2006, there was still some wiggle room at the top. Some very good colleges still exist, but you have to do your due diligence to find them. We were very pleased with my daughter's school, and she got a good education there with a minimum of politically-correct nonsense.

71 posted on 04/18/2014 7:29:38 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


72 posted on 04/18/2014 7:39:22 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: central_va
Didn't know that there were two different IQ scales, one using 15 and the other using 16 as the standard deviation. (The standard deviation used in the IQ scale was always 15, according to everything I've ever seen on the subject.)

Also, I don't see the Bush and Gore data points below your chart. your chart.

73 posted on 04/18/2014 8:10:18 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

After all these years, I still have never had to actually calculate the volume of a sphere, but I do know how!


74 posted on 04/18/2014 8:31:34 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

You are describing outliers with your example and this is of course accurate. However, their will be few 800 scorers that succeed in STEM areas and few 1600 scores that will aspire to education and humanities.

With regards to taking broad tests like SAT/ACT, there is indeed a strategy that increases the chance of bumping the score higher. It’s a bump though and improbable to achieve a radical improvement. It largely gives you the time to work through the things that are the hardest or most unknown to the person. I have worked with my kids and now my grand kids to teach this to them. It doesn’t take a monster big test for usage but applies to any test, essay or multiple choice.


75 posted on 04/18/2014 10:14:22 AM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
"Oh, and over-achiever eh!?"

Always...


76 posted on 04/18/2014 10:52:28 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

When it becomes clear that fewer and fewer students can do well on the standardized tests that their parents also took, you simply change the tests.

And you have to have a reason for the change. It can’t be the teaching, nor the lack of the discipline in class necessary to teach receptive students, nor the hedonistic attitude of students today, not the lack of parental supervision.

So it must be the structure of the test which discriminates by class and race. The fact that the changes will essentially dumb down the test is not politically correct.


77 posted on 04/18/2014 11:04:27 AM PDT by wildbill (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Yep. They are written by low IQ liberals.


78 posted on 04/18/2014 11:04:48 AM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

And if you believe that poster was speaking from that point of view I have a bridge to sell you.


79 posted on 04/24/2014 12:28:56 PM PDT by sipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sipow
I'll refer you back to your own reply, to which I responded:

Maybe they would even learn that it wasn’t the civil war being fought in 1776.

It was a civil war to the British. You made no reference to any point of view.

80 posted on 04/24/2014 9:21:16 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson