Skip to comments.New York the latest state to sign compact to end electoral college
Posted on 04/18/2014 6:32:49 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Governor Cuomo has signed off on the National Popular Vote Compact, giving New York's 29 electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote.
The Empire State has joined the National Popular Vote compact with legislation signed Tuesday by Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
States that have signed on to the interstate agreement will award electoral votes for president to the candidate who receives the majority of the national popular vote.
"With the passage of this legislation, New York is taking a bold step to fundamentally increase the strength and fairness of our nation's presidential elections," said Cuomo. "By aligning the Electoral College with the voice of the nation's voters, we are ensuring the equality of the votes and encouraging candidates to appeal to voters in all states, instead of disproportionately focusing on early contests and swing states."
Under the winner-take-all system, candidates for president have taken to ignoring states that are reliably Republican or Democratic, like New York, while focusing their attention and resources on a smaller group of battleground or swing states.
While New York has more than 13 million voters, ranking fourth in the nation, it is last when it comes to presidential spending.
New York joins the District of Columbia and nine states in signing on to the compact -- including California, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
The legislation utilizes New York state's right under the U.S. Constitution to award its 29 electoral votes in any manner it deems appropriate, in this case to the winner of the national popular vote.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I am beginning to understand why these liberal states want to cede their electoral sovereignty to the popular vote....
Republicans have LOST 5 of the 6 elections via the popular vote.
Bush lost in 2000 but won in 2004. But that was it.
I would think this is unconstitutional, but that depends on which flavor judge hears the case.
What will he say when his state votes for the popular vote loser?
New York’s vote didn’t count? We gotta go with Texas?
The Rats are in unknown territory with this one.
The Constitution leaves it entirely up to each state legislature how to select its electors.
OTOH, “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress ... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State”
Who needs to vote, anyway? Comrades? The central committee knows what is best. Freedom is slavery, slavery is freedom.
no taxation without representation
Actually, kind of funny! When a Republican wins the popular vote, Cuomo will rescind the law.
RE: I would think this is unconstitutional, but that depends on which flavor judge hears the case.
Well, somebody has to file suit. Who has the standing to do it?
If the democrats are for it...it must be bad.
Bad, bad, bad idea. Are we to trust Cuomo over Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, et al?
The Republic is almost totally dismantled. Only Article V. can begin to save it.
As the article points out, New York isn’t ceding its electoral power of Presidential elections, it’s retaking it.
National Popular Vote isn’t a Republican or Democratic movement, it’s a movement of heavily partisan states against “swing states.” The current system disempowers Mississippi and Utah as much as it disempowers California and New York.
You better believe when the day comes that the Republican nominee receives the plurality of popular votes, the New York and other Democrat legislatures will meet in emergency session shortly after Election Day and change the law to their favor.
Fortunately, these are all in long-conquered territory, so it'll be a wash. When "red" states start going this way is when it's time to be concerned.
An escape clause was written right into the bill they pushed here in Michigan. They could withdraw from the agreement for any reason (If it looked like a GOP win) 6 months before an election.
Sadly there are republicans who pimp this crap like Fred Thompson.
Mob rule, just what the founders wanted to avoid. Benjamin Franklin said we would have “A Republic if you can keep it.”
What would he say if he knew we would only keep it for a little over 200 years?
Algore is still eligible...
Once the Census-derived electoral college apportionment is replaced by popular vote counts, the states will gin up their numbers by reducing the voting age to 12 and granting the franchise to non-citizens. Election night will be an auction-like frenzy as state election boards discover hundreds of thousands of absentee ballots yet to be counted.
Unfortunately (or not) it is constitutional...................
If this becomes reality, the answer is divorce.
There is no reason for a state to remain in America without proper representation.
Yes, of course.
And, once again, our Founding Fathers prove how intelligent and wise they were.
They knew that city populations tend to attract the newly arrived and those who seek collectivist “protection” (liberals by the modern definition) and that those in the rural areas tend to be far more independent and self-reliant (conservative by the modern definition).
He also knew that the population densities in cities could easily outnumber the population of the rural areas.
They didn’t want a single big city in a state to dictate to the entire state.
So they installed two key rules: proportional representation and the electoral college.
The electoral college was designed to protect the minority from a purely pluralistic majority.
Of course, the left hates the idea of protecting conservatives, thus they are trying desperately to strike down the electoral college so that the country is essentially run by the major cities.
This will blow up in their faces like a balloon full of shaving cream.........................
CT (7 EV) and MN (10) are likely the next to join, giving them a total of 182 (of 270)...
PA (20), AZ (11), and MI (16) would hurt (and hit 229 total)...
but OK (7) and NE (5) would finish off the Electoral College for good, even with just 12 EV's and a total of 241 of 270, because once right-leaning states join, it's over.
(And FL conveniently gives them their last 29 to hit 270 exactly, assuming every state listed above joins the Compact)
“Unfortunately (or not) it is constitutional...................”
Well, it practically means the end of Republican presidents. (I almost wrote conservative presidents.) It won’t even take very many states.
Why not just allow the vote in FL Ca and Ny! Those are the three States that would elect a popular vote candidate anyway.
It’s already time to start worrying.
The blue states enacting this into law will make the red states far more vulnerable far more quickly.
You see, once these laws are passed, the leftists don’t need to worry about those states in the national elections any longer. They will be wrapped up and however the major cities go, that’s how the state goes. And that is hardcore leftist.
The leftists will then have that much more time and MONEY to concentrate on the purple and red states.
As David Horowitz says, the left is engaged in the art of political war. The rest of the country is watching TV and figuring out how to be kinder, gentler, more social.
Liberals that are for this that I have talked to think our country is a democracy and don’t understand a republic.
If we went to Nat’l popular vote, candidates wouldn’t have to bother making promises to voters in States that have a majority opposition, just hit the cities where most voters are friendly.
oh yeah, it benefits New York to have it gone which is why the thing was implemented
Actually, I believe that the numerous independent recounts in FLA showed that Bush would have won the NPV.
Remember Ronald Reagan.
He won every state except Minnesota in 1984........................
This is how red states should respond.
They will be counting votes by county with each county receiving one point. The candidate that wins the most counties wins the electoral vote of that state.
It keeps the constitution in place and also removes voter fraud and disenfranchisement, since a county only gets one point, the popular vote in that county can be 150% and no one is disenfranchised.
Call it a fire wall to prevent voter fraud disenfranchising an entire state. The rats cannot argue it because it takes away their talking points.
I wonder if any of these laws have any ‘escape clause’ that allows the governor to exit out of the compact if it looks like the other party will win the PV.................
This basic problem exists in the current system. Ohio (& Florida) elect our presidents. Candidates ignore Texas, California & New York (except for fundraising) because their electoral votes are a foregone conclusion.
Voting age of 12 with steak and potatoes in their lunch.
That’s true, but I read several report of voter fraud in those States also.
“I wonder if any of these laws have any escape clause that allows the governor to exit out of the compact if it looks like the other party will win the PV.................”
Funny, I had the same thought. They certainly wouldn’t want to add their votes to the other party and give them a win if they don’t have to. But it occurs to me if they do (a good possibility) then that is the legal attack vector.
Do you really want to trust this process to the Oprah/We Elected Obama TWICE populace?
Let alone to the spineless legislators without a shred of integrity?
And Hillery's FBI file collection
And the DNC/MSM data mining of IRS tax returns, census data, capriciously unsealed civil court records, etc?
Of course. Deep blue state never had to do vote cheating like liberal parts of swing states now do. With this scheme, the deeply embedded liberal power structure will mine every cemetery and mortuary for votes. Bad idea.
If they thought the “hanging chad” fraud left the 2000 election in limbo, just imagine Florida x 50: “Presidential Candidate X has garnered 10 million votes, Presidential Candidate Y has 10 million 100. Film at 11.”
bullpucky. It empowers Miami, L.A., NYC, Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago, Philly, and other liberal or undocumented enclaves to decide who will be the next Dear Leader(s).
We need one state to enact a law requiring their electors to vote opposite any popular vote cabal of states.
maybe we won’t need to even vote at all if the colors on that map line up right. Just do a census and elect the victors.
OK, lets use recent history to see how this will work. How much more important would the vote counts be on the Democrat West Coast if there was a similar close election to 2000? How long would it take to get a mutually acceptable count completed for these States to make their decision? The understated benefit of the Electoral College (EC) is a timely decision on date certain.
Al Gore’s bitter partisan’s constant bemoaning of the US Supreme Court decisions on Florida’s election process lose sight of the fact that time was running out for a decision for the participant selection from Florida. As it stood, Bush43 had a bare-bones transition between the December decision and the January Inauguration.
So visualize a similar election with a squeaking close popular vote and all of the different voting methods and disputable ‘hanging chads’ all over the country. Now remember such localities like King County Washington where sufficient post-election day 2004 ballots were ‘found’ to elect the Democrat candidate for Governor. Multiply this by all of the possible paths to election and then think HOW LONG it would take to find a candidate for these ‘Popular Vote’ states to swing their EC votes to.
Sorry, this is a lawyer’s dream and a nation’s nightmare!
Anyone else have thoughts on this?
I also know this is mainly an attempt to slant elections in favor of liberal urban areas vs. smaller, more rural states-- doesn't this also strike at the federal structure that has always been at the core of the Electoral College?
Thanks for the map.
I want to reform the electoral college system too.
I want every county in the country to have one electoral vote. Conservatives would win every time.
The problem with one vote per county is it would be hugely disproportional across the country.
1state, 1 vote. That would work.
Be nice and clean,
Shave every day and you'll always look keen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.