Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pols back Dot radio station (Feds shut down Touch 106.1) (pirate radio)
Boston Herald ^ | 4/19/14 | Bob McGovern

Posted on 04/19/2014 5:37:58 AM PDT by raccoonradio

Bay State politicians are defending an unlicensed radio station that was shut down this week by the Federal Communications Commission, but prosecutors say the crackdown was necessary to prevent a “public safety hazard.”

U.S. Marshals and the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau shut down Touch 106.1 FM, an unlicensed Dorchester station, Thursday and seized radio equipment, according to U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz.

Gov. Deval Patrick yesterday said he was “incredibly disappointed” by the raid and plans to ask the U.S. Attorney’s office to back down.

“You’d like to think of them bringing more of a problem-solving approach,” he said. “Touch is a pretty important voice in the community.”

Other politicians were equally vexed with the decision to shut down the unlicensed station founded by former mayoral candidate Charles Clemons.

“That station is an institution,” said Boston City Councilor Ayanna Pressley. “Myself and other elected officials of color are working collaboratively to apply pressure to lobby the FCC and find out what recourse exists.”

Ortiz defended the crackdown in a statement.

“It is a public safety hazard for illegal radio stations to broadcast, potentially interfering with critical radio communications,” Ortiz said.

Clemons, who founded the station in 2007, said he has not yet retained counsel, but has “received an outpouring of support” from local attorneys “and elected officials.”

He said he was able to get an Internet feed of the station running Thursday night.

“We’re the Rosa Parks of radio right now,” he said. “It’s not right what happened, and we’re going to fight.”

When asked why Touch 106.1 FM did not get a license, Clemons said, “We couldn’t. The FCC has shut it down so no one could apply for a license for 15 years. It’s not fair.”

Ortiz said stations like Clemons’ “could have applied for low power radio licenses and operated their stations in compliance with the law.”


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: devalpatrick; pirateradio; touchfm
There's already a change.org petition to get the station back on.

"Technically it's not illegal to be illegal in Massachusetts"--poss. Mass Gov Martha Coakley

Boston used to have black-oriented WILD AM 1090 and WILD-FM 97.7. Radio One sold the FM to Entercom so they could relay Worcester's rock station WAAF 107.3 closer to Boston (now WKAF). The AM station is brokered to China Radio International now, running programming that broadcasts about 20 % of normal volume. (Power the same, volume of the broadcast very faint.)

1 posted on 04/19/2014 5:37:58 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

2 posted on 04/19/2014 5:42:08 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

The verdict is in. Howie has officially declared Deval to be a worse governor than Dukakis. It’s hard to disagree.


3 posted on 04/19/2014 5:45:51 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

I recall Hillary back in the 1990’s wanted to end low power FM station licenses apparently (though not ostensibly) because most of the licenses were granted to church affiliated stations in the South.


4 posted on 04/19/2014 5:46:25 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (This is known as "bad luck". - Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

I guess this means that Obama hates black people.


5 posted on 04/19/2014 5:47:19 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (This is known as "bad luck". - Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
“It is a public safety hazard for illegal radio stations to broadcast, potentially interfering with critical radio communications,” Ortiz said.

Another example of misplaced and wasted government resources. Anybody with a shred of radio knowledge would know that an FM broadcast at 106.1 would be highly unlikely to interfere with any "critical radio communications" relevant to public safety unless the hip hop on WWKX from Woonsocket Rhode Island is somehow essential to public safety in Boston. And even then it is unlikely the 106.1 signal would spill over to WWKX's 106.3 band.

Of all the things the US Attorney in Boston could be looking in to and prosecuting, like whether there were more participants in the terror attacks last year, or illegal immigrants with criminal records who should be deported, or even drug gangs smuggling cocaine into Dorchester, somehow they have decided that a tiny community radio station listened to in a poor African American neighborhood is a "public safety threat".

Apparently they have never been in that neighborhood. The residents and visitors are worried about drugs, gangs, and shootings, not a local radio station.

If the US Attorney's office in Boston has nothing better to do than chase after a community radio station, then it would seem that they have too many attorneys and too large a budget for their needed work. The federal budget needs cutting, their office looks like a good place to start.

6 posted on 04/19/2014 5:51:35 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio; Admin Moderator
Duplicate thread, already posted here with well over 100 responses.

Different title, but same subject.

7 posted on 04/19/2014 5:55:38 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Well there are LPFM (Low Power FM) stations and there are translators. The latter cannot originate programming, but can relay another station. There are a bunch of translators that relay religious programming, for example. Some FM translators can relay things like AM talk stations—like
W235AV in “Tatnuck MA” which relays WTAG 580 (200 watts or so, antenna 700 ft up)

An LPFM example:
WLLO-LP 102.9 Londonderry NH (Londonderry public schools) which has about 100 watts. I believe LPFMs cannot run commercials. A translator can.

In Burlington VT “The Radiator” is an LPFM: WOMM-LP 105.9, owned by the Peace and Justice Ctr (how Burlington is that...) while W207AX 89.3 in Burlington VT is a translator, relaying KEAR out in CA, and owned by Family Radio.

The latter is probably a good example of a “church station”.

I don’t know if Clemons would be able to get his station back on as an LPFM but if so he couldn’t run commercials!
Pretty sure his ILLEGAL operation ran commercials too
(they claimed to have the call letters WTCH-LP...but were not an LPFM!)


8 posted on 04/19/2014 5:57:04 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
“Myself and other elected officials of color are working collaboratively to apply pressure to lobby the FCC and find out what recourse exists.”

Because it always comes down to that with demonRATS, doesn't it? Would they be defending lawbreaking done by Caucasians....of course not. Just try to imagine any other group of politicians making such a statement.....

Trey Gowdy: ...... 'Today, myself and all other Caucasian members of the committee were dismayed to find out that Elijah Cumming's staff conversed with Lois Lerner regarding 501c4 applicants who identified as Tea Party groups.'

The networks would have to cancel all other programming in order to run that clip 24/7 and parade countless democrats across the screen to excoriate Gowdy for his racist callousness.

9 posted on 04/19/2014 5:57:15 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Sorry, though this was kind of an updated version of the story...I had posted that too.


10 posted on 04/19/2014 5:57:56 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

I use to love ‘AAF when I was a kid in the 80s

it’s now WKAF? w-calf? loses quite a bit of the edge. then again, I heard them playing rap - RAP!! - when I checked them out on the Internet a couple of years ago. might as well start playing country...


11 posted on 04/19/2014 5:58:56 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing

“Datz Hitz” 99.7 in Boston was shut down and it was said to be interfering with pilot radio at Logan Airport. Maybe not much of a hindrance but poorly tuned transmitters of a pirate station may cause problems, as was said in other thread. Good point(s) though.


12 posted on 04/19/2014 5:59:33 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sten
The main station is WAAF 107.3 and it's simply relayed on WKAF 97.7...different call letters but similar in that K rhymes with A...just as WEEI has some sister stations with call letters WVEI.


13 posted on 04/19/2014 6:01:35 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sten

That was the thing—they were WBOT for awhile playing rap, then “WILD-FM”, same thing—only the black-owned company decided to sell to Entercom so they could relay rocker WAAF.


14 posted on 04/19/2014 6:02:37 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

It can be very hard to get a LPFM license but with some political backing from favored lackeys like Patrick, it should be possible for the station to go legit.


15 posted on 04/19/2014 6:03:42 AM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

I remember doing a lot of work in VA and NC in the 1990’s. Driving along the Jeff Davis Highway, just about every local Baptist church had an LPFM station frequency on its roadside billboard. Good for them, I say.


16 posted on 04/19/2014 6:09:10 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (This is known as "bad luck". - Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio; usconservative

Same posting freep (raccoonradio) different author of the article, slightly different material.


17 posted on 04/19/2014 6:11:00 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (This is known as "bad luck". - Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

If EVERYONE were allowed to broadcast from anywhere, on any frequency, at any power, the air waves would be a total mess. If a few selected groups (read ‘minorities’) are allowed to broadcast illegally there would be no way to stop others from broadcasting illegally. The “pols” that support an illegal black radio station are simply racist.


18 posted on 04/19/2014 6:12:57 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

I get it

seems like so long ago. a whole different life ... and a country that was shaking off the dregs of carter and learning to stand again thanks to Reagan. when it was ok to strive for success... and not be vilified for daring to dream for anything other then a fedgov supported welfare existence

WAAF might have been a favorite for stoners... but it was also a station loved by people pushing to succeed.

I haven’t run into any driven dreamers in a *very* long time


19 posted on 04/19/2014 6:13:28 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
“We’re the Rosa Parks of radio right now,” he said. “It’s not right what happened, and we’re going to fight.”

I'm all in favor of pirate radio but unless I'm missing something here the government always tries to shut it down, so I don't see the racial angle.

20 posted on 04/19/2014 6:18:11 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

Exactly—what should have happened was a group of these minorities band together to buy a station and run what they want (AM or FM). As it is there are some stations who will sell time or even give it away free (I’m on a college station north of Boston that has Hispanic shows on weekends—I would much rather have them do that on a legit station than start their own pirate that could interfere with a station, etc)

The AM and FM spectrum is limited...and things have to be considered like other stations, aircraft radio, etc. But there’s lots of room on the Web to streamcast. As much as I hate “big government” the FCC is there to protect the airwaves. People can pay big bucks to put stations on. What if some pirate then decided to go on right next to them?

One would have hoped public radio could accomodate them but they’re too busy running news-talk (WGBH and WBUR Boston). Public radio is a business too—WGBH has very expensive studios and running lefty talk and news is what gets them donations, corporate tax writeoffs, etc. They don’t have time for R&B, reggae, jazz etc. Thus weaker, college stations pick up the slack...or pirates.

Friend of mine in Methuen MA loved listening to 60s music on WMBR, MIT/Cambridge. One day he found he couldn’t pick them up because of some pirate station. Complained to FCC and the pirate was shut down. This is why we need the FCC!


21 posted on 04/19/2014 6:23:28 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

If you owned or listened to a station that gets interference due to pirate radio you wouldn’t be so thrilled with it. Yeah in places where there’s lots of space on the dial, maybe people can get away with it. But there are select few spots on the dial “open” in places like Boston—and the pirates go on. People with such things as XM Satellite Radio even need a spot on the dial to use so they can hear it in their car...and what if pirates take up all these spots?


22 posted on 04/19/2014 6:25:13 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
...because most of the licenses were granted to church affiliated stations in the South.

I would suggest that the then Corporate Cr@p network didn't like the additional competition.

Back when Art Bell was entertaining, one of his AF hitch stories was being stationed in TX. He and another guy were running some sort of broadcast as a hobby/passion, and when their "station" started appearing in the local Arbitron logs, they were ordered to close it down on the complaints of the local radio stations.

As for the church aspect, there was some legal hole that would allow challenges to NPR frequency assignments which a number of "religious" organizations glommed onto during a re-licensing period. That may have been when she was a NY senator, though.

As for this unlicensed FM station, perhaps they should follow the example of another former operator of an unlicensed FM station (a la "Radio Caroline", as well as a number of other earlier youthful pirate endeavors), Allan Weiner, and go legit?

23 posted on 04/19/2014 6:43:21 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
Sorry, though this was kind of an updated version of the story...I had posted that too.

I didn't realize that ...thanks.

24 posted on 04/19/2014 6:54:56 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
I'm all in favor of pirate radio but unless I'm missing something here the government always tries to shut it down, so I don't see the racial angle.

Silly, EVERYTHING is about race when you're black and the gubbmint is shutting you down.

As a licensed Amateur Radio Operator studying for his GROL, gotta say I'm not in favor of pirate radio - especially in the AM and FM bands as consumers know them. These two bands are ordered the way they are for a reason: clarity of signal and ability for consumers to receive clear signals without having to deal with a "mess" of overlapping signals.

Yes, there's the hefty license fee's also however absent order AM and FM would literally be useless.

In the Amateur Radio Bands, we already have to deal with the idiots who come up from CB illegally using amateur radio transceivers that they purchased from unscrupulous dealers, other Hams or estate sales. They make a big mess of the bands with their rude behavior and acting like children disrupting other people's conversations. These ignorant childish CB'ers are "pirates" themselves so no, I'm not in favor of "pirate radio." I worked and studied hard to achieve my licenses and did things "the right way." Idiot CB'ers in the Ham radio bands just piss me off.

25 posted on 04/19/2014 7:01:16 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
If an unlicensed radio transmitter is interfering with any licensed transmitter it needs to be shut down; the whole purpose of radio spectrum licensing is to prevent interference.

But I have a hard time seeing how an FM transmitter at 106.1 could be causing problems outside of the FM broadcast band. I'd like to see the spectrum data the US Attorney should have to support her prosecution.

26 posted on 04/19/2014 7:04:46 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: usconservative; Admin Moderator

Thanks for linking the threads, some of us missed the earlier posting.


27 posted on 04/19/2014 7:06:15 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

At the time Hillary was making a fuss about LPFM, she was first lady, and the animus towards LPFM was clearly aimed at church affiliated stations. She *HATED* Rush Limbaugh with a purple passion, and given time and power enough, would have had him taken off the air, arrested, and disemboweled.


28 posted on 04/19/2014 7:18:34 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (This is known as "bad luck". - Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
But I have a hard time seeing how an FM transmitter at 106.1 could be causing problems outside of the FM broadcast band.

A dirty transmitter on 106.1 can generate secondary harmonics which can be heard well above the frequency it's transmitting on and interfere well into the 220mhz band. That would mean the station in question could be interfering with everything from Ground to Air communications (airplanes) VLFR systems and more.

It's not hard to prove that interference is happening at all. Seize the equipment, put it on a bandscope and start looking for the secondary harmonics. Easy enough to do.

I've had to clean up a few radio's myself that were generating secondary harmonics (thankfully they didn't belong to me.)

29 posted on 04/19/2014 7:48:26 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

Hopefully most pirate radio stations would have more than one record, A Walk Through The Black Forest

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgb2hrjJXRk


30 posted on 04/19/2014 7:49:53 AM PDT by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
It's not hard to prove that interference is happening at all. Seize the equipment, put it on a bandscope and start looking for the secondary harmonics. Easy enough to do.

Secondary harmonics are also easy to record on the air. Don't have to have physical access to the transmitter doing it either.

31 posted on 04/19/2014 7:49:59 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Last year:

http://www.enterprisenews.com/x1905499940/Pirate-radio-station-in-Brockton-flagged-for-interference

>>Firefighters driving to work at the Pleasant Street station on the edge of downtown started reporting interference on their car radios this week.
Then on Wednesday, music started playing over the speakers in the station used for dispatching fire engines and garbling emergency communications.
“In the station, those speakers are used to alert firefighter to an incident, and that’s how we get the type of call and location,” said Deputy Fire Chief Kevin Galligan. “Any interference is a serious issue.”
...They discovered a satellite dish and an FM antenna on a radio mast directly across the street from Fire Station 1 at 69 Pleasant St..
The antenna extended nearly 60 feet in the air and an unlicensed station was broadcasting on 88.9 MHz, right next to WERS in Boston, DeNapoli said.


32 posted on 04/19/2014 7:58:41 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
The antenna extended nearly 60 feet in the air and an unlicensed station was broadcasting on 88.9 MHz, right next to WERS in Boston, DeNapoli said.

Not sure why WERS in Boston was mentioned -- irrelevant to the story.

The unlicensed station in that case was causing secondary harmonics likely between 152 and 162 Mhz, right where the Fire Department's frequency no doubt is.

Great example of secondary harmonics.

33 posted on 04/19/2014 8:03:16 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Yes..have seen harmonics like: near antenna
for WRKO 680 Boston (site in Burlington), put on
WLYN 1360 Lynn MA and WRKO blends with it. 680 x 2.


34 posted on 04/19/2014 11:38:32 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
No need to seize the equipment, just look at the radiated signal near the transmitter. As I noted before, the real issue should be "is there actually interference to other spectrum users?". That question is easy to answer, and the FCC guys should know the answer to that question. I suspect the answer is "none we could find".

In the absence of either measurable transmission of signals in spectrum space which are likely to cause problems, or real complaints, then spending taxpayer resources on the radio station is a waste of time and money.

Remember, this "investigation" has probably been going on for some time. It would have been nice if the federal government spent whatever money they have and are going to spend on this investigation looking into the reports from the Russian FSB regarding Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev before the two of them killed 4 people and horribly injured scores more. It has been reported that the Boston FBI office lacked the resources to do so. Apparently for the Justice Department spending our money on shutting down a minor FM unlicensed FM transmitter was and is more important than preventing a bombing.

If they have the resources to chase down and prosecute a minor violator of FM radio regulations, but they don't have the resources to check out reports of terrorists something is very wrong in their management process.

That's my point.

35 posted on 04/19/2014 1:13:11 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
If anything, that small radio station was a good way to keep the residents of that community in touch with something relevant in emergencies. It's a positive to have a community focal point.

I don't understand why there aren't some band widths left open for local "pirate" radio with limited range. It's another case of an out-of-control government taking away one of the few freedoms that remained.

36 posted on 04/19/2014 1:23:23 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
If they have the resources to chase down and prosecute a minor violator of FM radio regulations, but they don't have the resources to check out reports of terrorists something is very wrong in their management process. That's my point.

You're comparing apples to oranges here, and you're trying to say that by spending money on the FCC we're not able to "stop terrorism?" That's laughable. Do you know how miniscule the FCC's budget is compared to the FBI, CIA, etc.. ??? Obviously you don't. I'm heavily involved in Amateur Radio and see the effects of the lack of budget the FCC has on a first hand basis. There is no "band enforcement" in Amateur Radio anymore. If you're looking to complain about the FCC, a better complaint would be "why are they spending so much time trying to manage the Free Obamaphone Program and not enforcing the airwaves?"

No need to seize the equipment, just look at the radiated signal near the transmitter. As I noted before, the real issue should be "is there actually interference to other spectrum users?". That question is easy to answer, and the FCC guys should know the answer to that question. I suspect the answer is "none we could find".

I stated no need to seize the equipment further down this thread, and that the only thing the FCC needed to do was listen for secondary harmonics. You assume there weren't any. I don't assume there were, I simply stated that it was entirely possible that given the broadcast frequency of the offending station, that 106.1 could have a secondary harmonic that easily interfered with ground to air communications, VLFR and other systems related to public safety including local police or fire. That is reason enough to shut the illegal broadcast station down in addition to the fact it was an unlicensed station.

Broadcast stations require licenses FOR A REASON and there are strict operating procedures so that they do not have spurious emissions/secondary harmonics that can affect public safety. But hey, leave that unlicensed station alone until one day a fire department doesn't get the call over the air because of that unlicensed stations spurious emissions or secondary harmonics that an ambulance is needed somewhere and someone dies until we shut it down, right?

Your point is completely invalid and frankly you really don't know what you're talking about.

37 posted on 04/19/2014 2:14:45 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
If they have the resources to chase down and prosecute a minor violator of FM radio regulations, but they don't have the resources to check out reports of terrorists something is very wrong in their management process.

One last point: You do realize the FCC has absolutely nothing to do with terrorism, right? Faulting the FCC for not having the "resources to check out reports of terrorists" is a ridiculous charge. That's FBI territory.

38 posted on 04/19/2014 2:23:07 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Same subject, different article, therefore not a dupe.


39 posted on 04/19/2014 2:49:47 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Of course I know that the FCC doesn't have anything to do with the FBI. I suppose you realize that the FBI is a part of the Justice Department, and so is the US Attorney's office. So, as my posts clearly stated, the money being spent on the legal action against Touch 106.1 comes from the Justice Department budget. That's the same budget the FBI is under.

Whatever money was allocated for the US Attorney's office for this kind of case could have been allocated to the FBI for terrorism prevention.

I never made any "charge" regarding the FCC, and by the way they didn't need to do anything. Touch 106.1 doesn't make any effort to hide its operations, owners, etc.

Try reading my posts again.

40 posted on 04/19/2014 5:38:08 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
But hey, leave that unlicensed station alone until one day a fire department doesn't get the call over the air because of that unlicensed stations spurious emissions or secondary harmonics that an ambulance is needed somewhere and someone dies until we shut it down, right?

I presume you can provide examples of that happening, right?

All kinds of things "could happen", but in the real world they don't.

41 posted on 04/19/2014 5:43:24 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
So, as my posts clearly stated, the money being spent on the legal action against Touch 106.1 comes from the Justice Department budget. That's the same budget the FBI is under.

No, you're absolutely incorrect. FCC Enforcement Actions come from the FCC's budget. Again, you have no clue what you're talking about. I'm a licensed amateur radio operator studying for his GROL. I know what the FCC's rules and regulations are and how enforcement actions are handled. FCC Enforcement of FCC rules and regulations come from the FCC's budget, period.

42 posted on 04/19/2014 5:43:47 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
I presume you can provide examples of that happening, right?

Another poster cited an example earlier in this thread.

You can also go to the FCC's Enforcement Actions page (google that) and find examples should you so desire.

43 posted on 04/19/2014 5:44:59 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
I never made any "charge" regarding the FCC, and by the way they didn't need to do anything.

You're absurd. So you don't like the FCC enforcing the laws it's charged with enforcing. That's well established. Tell me, what other laws do you disagree with that you think shouldn't be enforced?

44 posted on 04/19/2014 5:46:48 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
FCC Enforcement Actions Related To Secondary Harmonic Interference for the lazy.
45 posted on 04/19/2014 5:52:25 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Try reading the entire post, maybe you'd understand it then.

I didn't say anything about the FCC not enforcing the law. I actually posted earlier that they should enforce it in every case where they had either complaints or evidence of interference.

My statement about them not needing to do anything referred to the limited need to do any technical work or investigation to determine the source of the signals they are concerned about. Unlike the example you gave, or some antenna with a transmitter found near a fire station, Touch 106.1 has a website, everybody in the area knew about it, etc. So the investigative budget would be minimal.

The station pretty much admits to operation without a license, so the only significant costs will be those of the prosecution of the owners and operators. And sorry, but I doubt the FCC pays the salaries of the people working on this case at the US Attorneys office. No more than they'll pay the salary of the Judge, or the Clerks, etc. who hear and process the paperwork in the case.

You have obviously done a good job of reading the material presented by the FCC as a part of learning about your hobby. That's fine. But in the larger scheme of things how our government spends our money, and the money it borrows in the name of our children from other people, matters. Chasing down some unlicensed radio transmitter unless there are complaints or actual cases of interference is a waste of time and money that could and should be used elsewhere.

46 posted on 04/20/2014 7:00:33 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
Chasing down some unlicensed radio transmitter unless there are complaints or actual cases of interference is a waste of time and money that could and should be used elsewhere.

If anyone on this thread doesn't get it, it's YOU. You've failed at least THREE times now to understand how interference jeopardizes public safety, and you advocate for literal chaos across the airwaves.

I'm done trying to explain this to you, you simply do not know what you're talking about on any level, and I'm done trying to educate you.

Have a nice day.

47 posted on 04/20/2014 7:07:06 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson