Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. moves to ban judges affiliated with Boy Scouts
Daily Caller ^ | April 21, 2014 | Patrick Howley

Posted on 04/21/2014 1:02:14 PM PDT by QT3.14

California is proposing to ban members of the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) from serving as judges because the Boy Scouts do not allow gay troop leaders, The Daily Caller has learned.

In a move with major legal implications, The California Supreme Court Advisory Committee on The Code of Judicial Ethics has proposed to classify the Boy Scouts as practicing “invidious discrimination” against gays, which would end the group’s exemption to anti-discriminatory ethics rules and would prohibit judges from being affiliated with the group.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: boyscouts; bsa; ca; california; gay; homosexualagenda; judge
The 'tolerant' Gay Mafia™ in action!

Can you imagine the outcry if somebody proposed Gay judges should be banned?

1 posted on 04/21/2014 1:02:14 PM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

And they are letting illegals practice law.

What if a conservative state banned those married to same sex from being a judge?


2 posted on 04/21/2014 1:04:13 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : 'You can keep your doctor if you want. I never tell a lie ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Guess they’ll have to ban Orthodox Jews, Catholics, Muslims, traditional Protestants, and Hindus then, too. Just to be fair and all.


3 posted on 04/21/2014 1:05:14 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Would someone please tell me why no one’s shooting yet?


4 posted on 04/21/2014 1:05:24 PM PDT by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Tolerance for thee, but not for me.

Ban Kalifornians. I am sick to death of hearing about their wholesale deviance and slide into the moral and ethical abyss. I know there are some good people there, to which I ask: WHY? WTF, over? Why live in that cesspool? There are plenty of States that would welcome you and your tax dollars; you’d probably come out way ahead, too.


5 posted on 04/21/2014 1:06:20 PM PDT by ronnyquest (I spent 20 years in the Army fighting the enemies of liberty only to see marxism elected at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Calif. moves to ban.......judges .........affiliated ....with Boy Scouts??

WHO are they KIDDING??

wasnt CA a big enough laughing stock before allowing this psychotic nonsense to be exposed??

how about banning judges who openly support PEDOPHILES??


6 posted on 04/21/2014 1:07:25 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

This CANNOT be legal. Not even in an America run by Obummer!


7 posted on 04/21/2014 1:08:06 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
"no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

But then of course, judges aren't known for having too firm a grasp of the Constitution.
8 posted on 04/21/2014 1:08:55 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Yet another issue for Tim Donnelly to win on.


9 posted on 04/21/2014 1:09:18 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
It's getting pretty clear: If you are in California, have anything to do with California, leave now, and shake the dust from your feet as you do.

Let it rot in its own festering juices.

10 posted on 04/21/2014 1:11:13 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Potentially the first in a series of PC loyalty tests. Consider it a test run in an area people don’t pay much attention to.

If you can screen the judiciary on the basis of association, you statistically affect the bias on judicial judgements.

Dangerous, and f’d up to boot.


11 posted on 04/21/2014 1:13:59 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Thought we had restraint of trade laws.


12 posted on 04/21/2014 1:14:57 PM PDT by edcoil (Not a single republican was ever a slave owner. They were all democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
The insanity of this should be evident to any rational person.

It is impossible to satirize what has been happening in America in recent decades, by exaggeration.

William Flax

13 posted on 04/21/2014 1:16:15 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

WTH?


14 posted on 04/21/2014 1:16:26 PM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

California used to set trends in good things. Now California just sets trends in depravity.


15 posted on 04/21/2014 1:17:31 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

I think the Oklahoma Militia has the right idea. I’m beginning to think that violence isn’t just a bad choice, it’s our only choice.


16 posted on 04/21/2014 1:20:51 PM PDT by Ben Mugged (The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus

Absolutely Invidious discrimination cannot be organization specific. If it is unacceptable it must be so from any quarter. This leaves all religious, moral and traditional marriage advocates out. Only the .001% need apply.


17 posted on 04/21/2014 1:21:59 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Bump


18 posted on 04/21/2014 1:24:28 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus
Guess they’ll have to ban Orthodox Jews, Catholics, Muslims, traditional Protestants, and Hindus then, too. Just to be fair and all.

Well, ok then, as long as they leave the Baptists alone.

19 posted on 04/21/2014 1:25:46 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only? 1 Cor. 13:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
How about if we use this precedent to ban judges with ties to Islam?
20 posted on 04/21/2014 1:33:11 PM PDT by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of gun control?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Thats what you get for caving in to the gay mafia. Give them an inch, they’ll take a mile.


21 posted on 04/21/2014 1:33:33 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Isn’t there something about free association in the Constitution? Not that that document matters in CA, or in El-Presidente’s world for that matter.


22 posted on 04/21/2014 1:34:33 PM PDT by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of gun control?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Hey they are already doing it in San Antonio Texas!!

No person shall be appointed to a position if the City Council finds that such person has, prior to such proposed appointment, engaged in discrimination or demonstrated a bias, by word or deed, against any person, group or organization on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, veteran status, age, or disability.


23 posted on 04/21/2014 1:35:23 PM PDT by Syntyr (Happiness is two at low eight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
Can you imagine the outcry if somebody proposed Gay judges should be banned?

And why stop there? Ban Christians from being judges and Boy Scouts. Ban heterosexuals from every occupation. Ban Christians from the city. Yes, Sodom and Gomorrah will rise from the ashes, finally, utopia.

24 posted on 04/21/2014 1:40:02 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator ( 2+2 = V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

“You know, we just want to live our lives like everyone else, from from having to remain in the closet. Just let us have our space and we’ll all live together side by side peaceably.”

The biggest lie of the last 20 years of the 20th Century.


25 posted on 04/21/2014 1:45:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Immigration Reform is job NONE. It isn't even the leading issue with Hipanics. Enforce our laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

How’s come? They already got what they wanted.


26 posted on 04/21/2014 1:50:49 PM PDT by Slyfox (When progressives ignore moral parameters, they also lose the natural gift of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Socialism NEVER plays nice with other political concepts.. EVER..

UNLESS they are the extreme minority... then its about being fair..

First they want yer shoes then yer socks then yer knees and then the boy scouts..
Then it’s bend over young man.. I have a present fer ya..


27 posted on 04/21/2014 1:57:41 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syntyr

What about a devout, conservative Catholic who believes Protestants and Jews will go to Hell? What about any devout Christian, Jew, or Muslim who believes homosexuality is a sin with serious, amply documented, bad public health implications?


28 posted on 04/21/2014 1:58:33 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

“Are you now or have you ever been associated with the Boy Scouts”

Chilling


29 posted on 04/21/2014 2:01:42 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

I seem to remember the BSA saying they wouldnt allow gays to be scout leaders after listening to a huge outpouring of concern from the public after conceding defeat and allowing them to become scouts.

Remember when just about everyone conservative said that if they nail down the BSA having to allow gay members they’d then shoot for getting gay scout leaders later. Well we told you so!

Its lefty incrementalism at work. Now their agenda is to put gay scout leaders in place to convert and form young children’s minds so they become gay just like them and they will have a large herd to choose from.

Any person who would place their sons in the hands of a pedophile should b shot. The progressive liberals probably want their children all gender anyway...


30 posted on 04/21/2014 2:03:15 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

> How’s come? They already got what they wanted.

How many rich rotten spoiled brat children do you know that are happy with anything they’ve ever been given for any length of time? Its never ending with them. Get one gift and then they look round the room and see something someone else has. They pout and their mom and das cave, they get a new gift, and the pattern repeats ad nauseum...this is what you’re dealing with here....


31 posted on 04/21/2014 2:10:48 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
Are you now or have you ever been associated with the Boy Scouts.

We will never hear them say, "Are you now or have you ever
been a Sissy Mary [hat tip to Blazing Saddles]"

32 posted on 04/21/2014 2:11:50 PM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

It would be hard to boycott California products - they make too much, especially fruit and veggies. Still, I’m going to start making an effort to buy from elsewhere.


33 posted on 04/21/2014 2:32:56 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Boycott the state as much as possible when traveling.


34 posted on 04/21/2014 2:35:17 PM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: All
Will it come down to this in Kalifornia when it is discovered somebody is associated with the Boy Scouts?


35 posted on 04/21/2014 2:39:55 PM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

So much for the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of association.


36 posted on 04/21/2014 2:44:15 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

That was back before the Rats gained control of everything by importing millions of illegal aliens. Rats are like Muslims who overtake and destroy everything they come into contact with.


37 posted on 04/21/2014 2:46:55 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

So, the California Supreme Court Advisory Committee on The Code of Judicial Ethics is discriminating against those they accuse of discrimination.

Irony.


38 posted on 04/21/2014 2:47:27 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

The Left has been packing the courts with liberal activist judges since FDR was president. This is just their latest ploy to corrupt the courts.


39 posted on 04/21/2014 2:48:23 PM PDT by Sixgun Symphony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ronnyquest

Faggies rule Kalifornica!!

(May the heavens rain fire and brimstone upon them.)


40 posted on 04/21/2014 2:53:17 PM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

So boyscouts can’t get a fair trial in califorina


41 posted on 04/21/2014 3:01:35 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks QT3.14.
...proposing to ban members of the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) from serving as judges because the Boy Scouts do not allow gay troop leaders...

42 posted on 04/21/2014 3:12:51 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

the fags are American nazis


43 posted on 04/21/2014 3:16:23 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

To be fair, ban judges who have ever been a part of or even remotely affiliated with any group or organization in existence or that has ever existed. It’s only fair, you know....then nobody can complain.


44 posted on 04/21/2014 3:20:59 PM PDT by jughandle ( "We have the right to debate and disagree with any administration!" -HRColl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

The left’s battle against the Boy Scouts began when Scouts were boo’ed at the 2000 DNC in Los Angeles when reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. It shocked me how anyone would mock an institution like the Scouts. While I detest these vermin, I admire how radical leftists stick together and fight for their convictions.

The GOPe could learn from them.


45 posted on 04/21/2014 4:06:41 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
Calif. moves to ban judges affiliated with Boy Scouts
The California Supreme Court Advisory Committee on The Code of Judicial Ethics has proposed...
Can you imagine the outcry if somebody proposed Gay judges should be banned?

Excellent question.
To which I might add...

Who are these sterling citizens? Names, please...
Has anyone bothered to check if any members of this "California Supreme Court Advisory Committee on The Code of Judicial Ethics"...
Is currently or has ever been gay?
Has relatives who are gay?
Has close friends or close legislative or judicial constant contact with anyone who is gay?

Full disclosure would require these questions to be answered... under oath.
I am serious.

46 posted on 05/22/2014 9:10:51 AM PDT by publius911 ( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911
Hon. Richard D. Fybel (Chair), Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three.
Hon. George J. Abdallah, Jr., Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin
Hon. Kevin A. Enright, Judge Superior Court of California, County of San Diego
Ms. Beth Jay, Principal Attorney to the Chief Justice, Supreme Court of California
Hon. Barbara J.R. Jones, Presiding Justice, Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Five
Hon. Ronni MacLaren, Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
Hon. David Rothman, Retired
Hon. Laurence D. Rubin, Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight

Mailing address:
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street San Francisco, CA 94102-4797

Staff Contact: Mr. Mark Jacobson
Phone: 415-865-7898

47 posted on 05/22/2014 9:17:59 AM PDT by publius911 ( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson