Calif. moves to ban judges affiliated with Boy Scouts

Daily Caller ^ | April 21, 2014 | Patrick Howley

[QT3.14]

California is proposing to ban members of the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) from serving as judges because the Boy Scouts do not allow gay troop leaders, The Daily Caller has learned.

In a move with major legal implications, The California Supreme Court Advisory Committee on The Code of Judicial Ethics has proposed to classify the Boy Scouts as practicing “invidious discrimination” against gays, which would end the group’s exemption to anti-discriminatory ethics rules and would prohibit judges from being affiliated with the group.

[QT3.14]

The 'tolerant' Gay Mafia™ in action!

Can you imagine the outcry if somebody proposed Gay judges should be banned?

[sickoflibs]

And they are letting illegals practice law.

What if a conservative state banned those married to same sex from being a judge?

[Argus]

Guess they’ll have to ban Orthodox Jews, Catholics, Muslims, traditional Protestants, and Hindus then, too. Just to be fair and all.

[MeganC]

Would someone please tell me why no one’s shooting yet?

[ronnyquest]

Tolerance for thee, but not for me.

Ban Kalifornians. I am sick to death of hearing about their wholesale deviance and slide into the moral and ethical abyss. I know there are some good people there, to which I ask: WHY? WTF, over? Why live in that cesspool? There are plenty of States that would welcome you and your tax dollars; you’d probably come out way ahead, too.

[MeshugeMikey]

Calif. moves to ban.......judges .........affiliated ....with Boy Scouts??

WHO are they KIDDING??

wasnt CA a big enough laughing stock before allowing this psychotic nonsense to be exposed??

how about banning judges who openly support PEDOPHILES??

[VanDeKoik]

This CANNOT be legal. Not even in an America run by Obummer!

[Telepathic Intruder]

"no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

But then of course, judges aren't known for having too firm a grasp of the Constitution.

[Regulator]

Yet another issue for Tim Donnelly to win on.

[fwdude]

It's getting pretty clear: If you are in California, have anything to do with California, leave now, and shake the dust from your feet as you do.

Let it rot in its own festering juices.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Potentially the first in a series of PC loyalty tests. Consider it a test run in an area people don’t pay much attention to.

If you can screen the judiciary on the basis of association, you statistically affect the bias on judicial judgements.

Dangerous, and f’d up to boot.

[edcoil]

Thought we had restraint of trade laws.

[Ohioan]

The insanity of this should be evident to any rational person.

It is impossible to satirize what has been happening in America in recent decades, by exaggeration.

William Flax

[Pajamajan]

WTH?

[The_Media_never_lie]

California used to set trends in good things. Now California just sets trends in depravity.

[Ben Mugged]

I think the Oklahoma Militia has the right idea. I’m beginning to think that violence isn’t just a bad choice, it’s our only choice.

[Louis Foxwell]

Absolutely Invidious discrimination cannot be organization specific. If it is unacceptable it must be so from any quarter. This leaves all religious, moral and traditional marriage advocates out. Only the .001% need apply.

[lowbridge]

Bump

[Graybeard58]

Guess they’ll have to ban Orthodox Jews, Catholics, Muslims, traditional Protestants, and Hindus then, too. Just to be fair and all.

Well, ok then, as long as they leave the Baptists alone.

[logic101.net]

How about if we use this precedent to ban judges with ties to Islam?