Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chelsea Clinton's Baby, Politicized
Townhall.com ^ | April 23, 2014 | Brent Bozell

Posted on 04/23/2014 5:04:09 AM PDT by Kaslin

Chelsea Clinton announced she's going to be a mother this year. That should elicit the same reaction reserved for the daughter of any former president: a polite "how nice." But this is a Clinton. Everything with the Clintons gets filtered through politics. It is fitting (and equally crass) that this news is met with this reaction: "Hillary (Clinton) in 2016. Does it help or hurt?"

Indeed, that is precisely how pro-Hillary pundits reacted, leaping to profess this will succeed in adding warmth and humanity to Hillary's image in the years to come. But put the celebration on hold. This was surely the same concept the Democratic pundits had in Little Rock, Ark., when Chelsea was born in 1980, and the warm image never really stuck.

It's easy to say Chelsea never chose this life for herself and certainly never deserved what her parents put her through in the national embarrassment of 1998. The media (including most conservative news outfits) never disturbed her childhood, which is good. What is not good is that many reporters never let her childhood end.

Coverage of Chelsea campaigning for her mother in 2007 and 2008 demonstrated that tendency. New York Times reporter Jodi Kantor penned embarrassing paragraphs about how Chelsea's "a focus of public fascination," co-workers find she has a "deeply admirable ability to yield focus," and "people seem delighted just to watch her lips move and hear sound emerge." Then remember David Shuster being banned from MSNBC for suggesting that "Chelsea's sort of being pimped out in some weird sort of way."

That's too crude, but it's undeniable that Bill and Hillary Clinton have long performed a hypocritical one-two step in their political salesmanship. Chelsea was off-limits until it was crucial for them to plant their daughter next to them to improve their own tattered images. Their energetic media defenders danced those steps as well.

If the Clintons were truly retired from running for office, this baby news would be easy to celebrate. But since Hillary is making it obvious she's running for president again, the media's hyper-enthusiastic coverage makes the whole thing feel like a partisan event, right down to ABC cooing about how the Clintons are America's "royal" family. In fact, ABC spent almost 13 minutes over five days on Chelsea baby news, but failed to spend a second on some more substantive Washington stories, like Obama's latest delay of a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline.

It also feels partisan when compared to 2012, when Jenna Bush announced she was pregnant on NBC's "Today" show (where she, like Chelsea, is an occasional contributor). That drew 33 seconds on NBC, and the other two networks said nothing. Someone might argue that George W. Bush had been out of office for a term, so that wasn't as newsworthy. But that only underlines that this baby rollout carries the promotional echo of a future campaign.

It certainly is more promotional than the coverage of Republican offspring in 2012. The Romney sons were questioned again for their lack of military service. The liberal website Slate slammed Rick Santorum's kids for getting "too much vacation" from home-schooling and started a caption contest about Santorum's daughters -- including a middle-schooler -- where liberal commenters predictably started mocking how these girls were on contraceptives, or wearing chastity belts, or were improperly touching themselves. Radio host Randi Rhodes begged that Santorum's home-schooled kids should never try to be surgeons, pilots or nurses.

These families could only wish for the Clinton treatment.

Chelsea Clinton should enjoy first-time motherhood just like any other American. But the "royal family"? Let's turn down the volume on the hype.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: bozell

1 posted on 04/23/2014 5:04:09 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Rosemary’s Baby.

Not just a work of fiction any more.

WAY more spooky.


2 posted on 04/23/2014 5:05:49 AM PDT by alloysteel (Selective and willful ignorance spells doom, to both victim and perpetrator - mostly the perp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Surprised that Chelsa didn’t offer the kid up on the abortion alter. That would really make her a raising star.


3 posted on 04/23/2014 5:06:16 AM PDT by Yorlik803 ( Church/Caboose in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yorlik803

“Surprised that Chelsa didn’t offer the kid up on the abortion alter. That would really make her a raising star.”

It would, but this is timed for Hillary’s benefit, IMO. She already has the hairy-legged butch feminazi vote in the bank. Images of “Benign Grandma Hillary” will be staged to grab votes for the political middle.


4 posted on 04/23/2014 5:09:31 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yorlik803

It is hard not to envision scenarios of a Hillary running for President using the “baby” for her own selfish ends. I can see a crying Hillary as she falls behind the Republican nominee holding the kid and a compliant media asking, “why do Republicans hate Chelsea’s baby?” or some such nonsense.


5 posted on 04/23/2014 5:09:55 AM PDT by corlorde (forWARD of the state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
How nice....Webb Hubble will have a grandchild.


6 posted on 04/23/2014 5:10:01 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“punished...with a baby”


7 posted on 04/23/2014 5:11:09 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obvious question for Hillary, “Has Chelsea considered getting an abortion? If not, why not? Is abortion still an option if polling doesn’t show a ‘baby bump’?


8 posted on 04/23/2014 5:11:18 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What?

It’s a “baby”?

It’s an “unborn child”?

Really, lefties?


9 posted on 04/23/2014 5:11:58 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corlorde

Sad but true...These people are truly beyond disgusting.


10 posted on 04/23/2014 5:12:27 AM PDT by Yorlik803 ( Church/Caboose in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Prove it.....

dig in your pocket for the money to hire a detective to go get all the DNA samples proving the concept.

History demands it

(a FR fundraiser to get the DNA for Web, Hillary, Bill, Danny williams etc would do the job)


11 posted on 04/23/2014 5:12:58 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Prediction: Chelsea will have this baby.


12 posted on 04/23/2014 5:13:27 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That Mezvinsky kid will truly be raised by a village. Keep the granddads away from him/her: one’s a convicted felon, the other’s an impeached President.


13 posted on 04/23/2014 5:14:20 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Why wouldn’t she?


14 posted on 04/23/2014 5:15:26 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The scary thing is that the Clintons and the Mezvinskys will be reproducing.


15 posted on 04/23/2014 5:20:15 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I remember this past fall it was reported that both she and her husband said in an interview that 2014 would be the year the start their family. Had mentioned that often in regards to Hillary, keep an eye on Chelsea.


16 posted on 04/23/2014 5:20:34 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bert

Prove it?

I’d just as soon imply.....more fun to watch the Clintonites get livid. (seeing as how the truth in this case will not change any future elections)


17 posted on 04/23/2014 5:22:47 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I used to feel some sympathy for Chelsea....my gosh, with those parents, and in the constant public eye? No more. She allowed her wedding to be an attempt at a William/Kate type royal event, even though no one except the media and Clintonistas cared. And now she's letting her pregnancy be a Clinton publicity stunt.

Instead of having very public announcements on TV, it would've been much classier to not announce the pregnancy until there's a baby bump and people notice. It used to be good form to try to keep pregnancies private for the first three months or so.

18 posted on 04/23/2014 5:39:45 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

“Obvious question for Hillary, “Has Chelsea considered getting an abortion? If not, why not? Is abortion still an option if polling doesn’t show a ‘baby bump’?”

Answer: The fetus was tested and found not to have the extra chromosome and is the right sex. it has not yet been tested for the dreaded TEA party syndrome. If TEA is found it will be sucked out immediately.


19 posted on 04/23/2014 5:54:34 AM PDT by waredbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How many want to bet that Hillary told Chelsea that now was the time to get knocked up. I bet it was a direct order.


20 posted on 04/23/2014 6:04:01 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Baby? Let’s all be consistent, here. It’s Chelsea Clinton’s fetus!


21 posted on 04/23/2014 6:23:54 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In a sense you really have to feel for this child.

Conceived as a political prop. Sure to be raised by illegal Mexican nannies. Eventually to be trotted out and paraded around as the next link of a legacy chain.


22 posted on 04/23/2014 6:49:41 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty
How many want to bet that Hillary told Chelsea that now was the time to get knocked up. I bet it was a direct order.

I bet Hil personally carried the turkey baster.


23 posted on 04/23/2014 6:50:20 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Conceived as a political prop.

Meanwhile these are the same people who accused Sarah Palin of the same thing. Democrats do love to project, don't they?

24 posted on 04/23/2014 6:50:51 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Web Hubble's gonna be a granddaddy...
25 posted on 04/23/2014 7:07:41 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

I was thinking the same thing. Anyone calling that a “baby” until third trimester is just wrong. Need to see some journos asking her if she’s going to carry the fetus to term and whether the baby will have her or her husband’s last name. Don’t pass this opportunity up.


26 posted on 04/23/2014 9:04:48 AM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Baby Nero. All hail little Nero! Nos morituri te salutamus!

Barfbag, please.

27 posted on 04/23/2014 2:21:24 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat
..... whether the baby will have her or her husband's SPERM DONOR'S last name ....

Is that clarifying?

"So, Chelsea .... is Ed the baby-daddy, or just a beard? Is there Someone Special in the background that we need to know about?"

28 posted on 04/23/2014 2:26:42 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

29 posted on 04/23/2014 2:32:30 PM PDT by OwenKellogg (Fundamental transformation leads to ... you don't want to go there, buddy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Too bad she didn't run off with a 1960s hippie radical. That would be news...

No, wait...

-PJ

30 posted on 04/23/2014 2:48:12 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The thought of the Clintons as American royalty makes me want to put in papers at one of the Commonwealth consulates in LA. Or see if the nunciature in Washington will take citizenship apps.


31 posted on 04/23/2014 2:56:28 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OwenKellogg

Its the seriousness of the charge ...


32 posted on 04/23/2014 3:47:21 PM PDT by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Question:

Why is the Progressive world in love with Hillary.

Just asking


33 posted on 04/23/2014 5:11:34 PM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ripley

Actually the progressive world is in love with Fauxcahontas Warren.

Hillary is more the “mainstream” Democrat candidate that the Entitlement Army AND crony capitalists feel very comfortable with.


34 posted on 04/23/2014 5:15:58 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Yorlik803

Why would Chelsea abort her child? This kid is a vital part of the Hillary 2016 campaign. The MSM “granny gasm” has already begun in earnest.


35 posted on 04/23/2014 5:17:38 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
Ah cain't wait for the Bar Mitzvah!


36 posted on 04/23/2014 5:20:16 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson