Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Camille Paglia: The Drinking Age Is Past Its Prime
NewsOK.com ^ | April 24, 2014 | Camille Paglia

Posted on 04/24/2014 4:45:51 AM PDT by Biggirl

The age 21 rule sets the United States apart from all advanced Western nations, and it has pushed kids toward pills and other anti-social behavior.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsok.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 21; drinking; paglia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: livius

Married at 16

Could not buy ETOH until 18 in the first state we lived

Could not buy ETOH until 21 in the second state we lived

Had a mortgage, car payments and full family and work responsibilities at 18.


41 posted on 04/24/2014 6:39:37 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

My kids drank at home under my supervision at every celebratory event from the age of 12 or so. They had wine/water mix at the table at celebratory events from the time they could hold a wine glass. If the teens wanted to try a specific beer or spirit I would purchase it and we would sample.

It demystified alcohol and helped them integrate ETOH use into their lives.

I remember my son telling me that he sort of laughed up his sleeve at his friends who would get a bottle of ETHOH and drink it and treat it like contraband. He said: I know that I can come home and ask for a drink if I wanted it and I would get it. I am so much freer than they are.


42 posted on 04/24/2014 6:42:46 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Our babies (and an occasional pet) have always liked a bit of wine.


43 posted on 04/24/2014 6:45:25 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Celebrating the return of Piper after 16 days on the lam. Have a drink!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

Well, the Feds didn’t dictate. They just told the states that if they didn’t up the age, highway funds would be denied. It was blackmail.


44 posted on 04/24/2014 7:06:31 AM PDT by MisterArtery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LumberJack53213
Heavy boozing may be Anglo-Saxon culture. Certainly Mediterranean people don't overinduldge. Of course, then there are the Russians...
45 posted on 04/24/2014 7:12:19 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Russians are lightweights, compared to Poles.


46 posted on 04/24/2014 7:13:13 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Really! Oh, well, that cold weather...


47 posted on 04/24/2014 7:14:43 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

As they say, Don’t spit in the wind, don’t tug on Superman’s cape, and don’t get into a drinking contest with a Pole.


48 posted on 04/24/2014 7:17:48 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MisterArtery

OK, where in the constitution does it authorize the federal government to provide the states with highway funds?


49 posted on 04/24/2014 7:35:55 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
When I turned 18, my parents had no problem with me grabbing a beer from the fridge.

I allow my 12 YO son a sip or two of new wines or brews I bring into the house...under my supervision of course. Thanks to a wine & viticulture class I'm taking for fun this semester, I've been bringing home a bottle or two every couple of weeks.

He's seen the problems created by his older siblings when they've had too much to drink, so I think he'll be more responsible when he's older.

My attitude towards the drinking age is simple: if you can enlist in the Army at 18, you should be able to have an adult beverage in public.

The current laws contribute to the prolonged adolescence of young adults today.

50 posted on 04/24/2014 8:15:43 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Our babies (and an occasional pet) have always liked a bit of wine.

______________

Our babies (and an occasional pet) have often indulged in a bit of whine.


51 posted on 04/24/2014 8:19:55 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Oh, that too, and also screaming fits.


52 posted on 04/24/2014 9:11:37 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Celebrating the return of Piper after 16 days on the lam. Have a drink!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

The current laws contribute to the prolonged adolescence of young adults today.

**
I agree. And I am convinced that the prohibition on buying cigarettes under the age of 18 was deliberately put into place to encourage teen smoking as an act of rebellion and was done at the instigation of the tobacco companies.

I have no proof, and I can cite no data, but it really seems to have followed this pattern. Around the time that those laws were passed, smoking had become socially unacceptable, and teens were not picking up the habit. Cigarette manufacturers were in danger of losing customers. Then came the prohibition, and teen smoking numbers increased.


53 posted on 04/24/2014 10:16:08 AM PDT by Bigg Red (1 Pt 1: As he who called you is holy, be holy yourselves in every aspect of your conduct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LumberJack53213

Maybe for those who do not know how to stop after one or two. Those who know where to stop do get good out of it.


54 posted on 04/24/2014 11:49:25 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun" - Obama, setting RoE with his opposition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
I remember back when the drinking age was 18 and it wasnt pretty.

What wasn't "pretty" about it? We were grown, working adults that bought beer when we wanted to. Makes perfect sense to me.

55 posted on 04/24/2014 11:59:18 AM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
You write the common misconception that Prohibition did not work. It did in fact work. Drunkenness was in fact reduced. Prohibition was repealed by what today would be called “interests:” i.e. the Kennedy's and their ilk. Capone in Chicago rose by using booze as well as bribery, extortion, murder etc. the true cause of his rise was Chicago political and social corruption. To repeal Prohibition a great media blitz was initiated along with the active promotion of cigarette smoking especially by women. Repeal of Prohibition and initiating of smoking were among the first examples of media control of the mass mind. The same media "Boom" is being used today to promote free love and narcotics addiction. Behind the "Boom" is money and the attitude of damn the consequences.
56 posted on 04/24/2014 12:00:19 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Then one must be firm enough to act directly against the users as well as the substances themselves. Prohibitions do work, they simply do not work perfectly. However, no Prohibitory law works perfectly; i.e. the laws against murder have not stopped murder. Do we therefore refuse to pass and prosecute acts of murder? Indeed, I have read that most murders in the U.S. are never solved. Therefore, do we stop passing and prosecuting laws against murder?

There are only two major values left today Power and Pleasure.

57 posted on 04/24/2014 12:06:43 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
texting while driving - which is now killing more people than drunks!

I heard that highways accidents causes are #1)Cell phone use, especially texting; #2)Fatigue; #3)Alcohol-related.

The legal definition of 'alcohol-related' has been expanded in some states to the point of absurdity. i.e. Open container even if driver was sober and container was empty.- still alcohol 'related'. Screw MADD!

58 posted on 04/24/2014 12:10:19 PM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: houeto
RE :”What wasn't “pretty” about it? We were grown, working adults that bought beer when we wanted to. Makes perfect sense to me.”

‘The term ‘adults’ is subjective, arbitrary and case dependent.

If a government set the age of an adult at 12 would that mean that 12 year old are ready to make decisions on sex?

That sounds like a train wreck to me.

And the 18 year old drinking age was a train wreck. It came out of the military draft.

59 posted on 04/24/2014 12:14:02 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : 'You can keep your doctor if you want. I never tell a lie ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: LumberJack53213
Nothing and I mean nothing good comes from drinking.

Really?!?

60 posted on 04/24/2014 12:14:33 PM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson