Skip to comments.Bundy: HOAX EXPOSED: Full Clip Of Bundy’s Non-Racist, Pro-Black, Pro-Mexican, Remarks Vs. NYT
Posted on 04/25/2014 5:06:59 AM PDT by foundedonpurpose
HOAX EXPOSED: Full Clip Of Cliven Bundys Non-Racist, Pro-Black, Pro-Mexican, Anti-Government Remarks Vs. NYTimes Deceptively Edited Version Home » Feature » HOAX EXPOSED: Full Clip Of Cliven Bundys Non-Racist, Pro-Black, Pro-Mexican, Anti-Government Remarks Vs. NYTimes Deceptively Edited Version
Apr 24, 2014 199 Comments Jack Flash
SEE THAT CLIVEN BUNDY IS ACTUALLY AN ADVOCATE FOR BLACKS, HISPANICS
Watch Bundy explain how we need to keep things from going backwards for blacks, and how the Federal government has created a neo-slave class via entitlement dependency that is so bad it is arguably worse than plantation slavery was. It is 100% clear that Cliven Bundy is not saying that blacks should be slaves picking cotton, but that the Federal government has created conditions for them so terrible, that their current situation may actually be worse. (If you are person of low intelligence, the fact that that is his point might be too hard for you to understand.) And hes not blaming blacks for the issues of abortions, and crime and broken families, hes blaming the Feds. This is the exact opposite of a racist, this is an advocate for the welfare and best interests of blacks. And just as importantly, youll at the end of the video he gives passionate praise and defense of hispanic illegal aliens, lauding them for better family structures than most white peoples Racist? Why is he praising Mexicans as better than whites, if hes some sort of white supremacist racist?. Take a hike all you lying, character-assassinating, leftist pieces of dog shit.
H/T Velvet Hammer VIA IRONIC SURREALISM
Now watch the edited version of Bundys remarks as promoted by the left-wing Media Matters and as reported in the NY Times:
(Excerpt) Read more at patdollard.com ...
The real problem is getting this information into the MSM.
They will spike it with extreme prejudice.
The first is the Media Matters editted version that the NYT used.
The second is the full statement.
Post it everywhere possible. Make this thing go viral. It’s the only way because the MSM will ignore it.
“But he used the word ‘NEGRO’! He’s a RACIST!”
Shibumi, many thanks for the links!
All y’all, ping to this post!
MSM exposed again!
We heard the audio. Cliven Bundy is a crackpot.
Ping for later
Well the Marxist used the magic word and the GOP plus some of the rank and file were running around in circles.
But the left would insinuate that since he’s a “crackpot” or a “racist”,
that the over the top thuggery exhibited by the fedthugs was justified.
Don’t go there.
Not only the M S M ,but the liberals here on FR ,who have fallen for the NYT's doctoring of the interview.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. He is saying the same things Rush and Levin ssy - the welfare system has trapped blacks (and people of all races) into a quagmire they can’t escape.
The media twisted Bundy’s words much like the old story below:
“A Harley rider is riding by the zoo in Washington, DC when he sees a little girl leaning into the lion’s cage. Suddenly, the lion grabs her by the cuff of her jacket and tries to pull her inside to slaughter her, under the eyes of her screaming parents.
The biker jumps off his Harley, runs to the cage and hits the lion square on the nose with a powerful punch.
Whimpering from the pain the lion jumps back letting go of the girl, and the biker brings her to her terrified parents, who thank him endlessly.
A reporter has watched the whole event. The reporter addressing the Harley rider says, ‘Sir, this was the most gallant and brave thing I’ve seen a man do in my whole life.’
The Harley rider replies, ‘Why, it was nothing, really, the lion was behind bars. I just saw this little kid in danger and acted as I felt right.’
The reporter says, ‘Well, I’ll make sure this won’t go unnoticed. I’m a journalist, and tomorrow’s paper will have this story on the front page...
So, what do you do for a living and what political affiliation do you have?’
The biker replies, ‘I’m a U.S. Marine and a Republican.’
The journalist leaves.
The following morning the biker buys the paper to see news of his actions, and reads, on the front page:
“U.S.MARINE ASSAULTS AFRICAN IMMIGRANT AND STEALS HIS LUNCH’
That pretty much sums up the media’s approach to the news these days.
But........ He said NeeeeeeeesGRO!!!!!!!!
He didn’t use the latest politically correct language.
BTW, what is the latest politically correct term to refer to people who have darker skin than George Hamilton?
Would it be racist to call George Hamilton a darkie?
I heard the audio and Clive Bundy is spoy on.
> Not only the M S M ,but the liberals here on FR ,who have
> fallen for the NYT’s doctoring of the interview.
I learned a long time ago that the MSM, and especially rags like the NYT and the ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN statist propaganda outlets, cannot be trusted at all. Not a whit. They NEVER tell the whole story, but only those parts that will pander to their base.
I agree with that. Hannity is the most consistently conservative radio/tv personality with a large audience.
He came out yesterday against the "racist remarks", but even his 10pm show is recorded much earlier in the day, so he'd probably not yet heard the real recording.
His radio show today will be telling. If Hannity doesn't walk back some of his comments today, then I don't think it will happen at all.
Now, being honest with you, even though Bundy DID intend to be saying that blacks have been injured by welfare maybe as much as by actual slavery, the problem is the choice of IMAGES he chose. The cotton picking theme, to matter the intent, is just not an image that can be overcome.
The most anyone will be able to say in Bundy's behalf, and I'm talking about major media outlets like Hannity and Rush, is that Bundy did a poor job of expressing his real concern for welfare slavery, and that he doesn't appear to have in his heart any animus toward any racial group, but that he chose really inappropriate words and images to convey his meaning.
Already that's too complicated an explanation to be able to overcome the LSM and their race hustlers.
Another problem, and I'm being honest here. Bundy came out in favor of full, open, unequivocal amnesty.
How do conservatives handle that?
Finally, none of this has anything to do with his losing his ranch and open range, grazing, and water rights. We should support his keeping his ranch, his freedoms, and the government getting its hands off all that western land.
Nothing wrong with the word Negro, in fact the blacks used it themselves for most of my life. Remember the “united negro college fund?”