Posted on 04/26/2014 10:45:28 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
A principled stance has NO EXCEPTIONS!!
1. No abortion. No exceptions.
2. No taxes. No exceptions.
3. No welfare. No exceptions.
4. No minimum wage. No exceptions.
5. No world policing. No exceptions.
Effe DemocRat Ru Paul.
Is Paul pro life or not? That is the topic of this thread. If you contend Paul is not prolife then please submit your evidence. Paul has been a US Senator for 4 years, he has a record, show me where in Paul’s US Senate voting record he is not prolife. thanks
See post 20, I would have to say that Paul is not pro-life.
That is what this thread article is revealing.
Careful - you will be accused of being a left-Wing plant if you ask them to use their brains for actual thinking.
Despite all evidence of the world being a myriad subset of gray shades, there are many who are incapable of admitting that reality is not and cannot be a pure black/white enterprise. That thinking dooms us to Leftist control because they will invariably find reason to 'disqualify" anyone on our side who shows the ability to think in terms of reality.
“Careful - you will be accused of being a left-Wing plant if you ask them to use their brains for actual thinking.”
Yeah, don’t I know it!
I read the article, Paul was talking about an exception for the LIFE of the mother. I agree with him.
No he wasn’t, there is no discussion about “an exception for the LIFE of the mother” of the mother, there are no politics on “an exception for the LIFE of the mother” of the mother, there are no political movements or arguments against “an exception for the LIFE of the mother” and Paul wasn’t having so much trouble and rambling and taking so long answering the abortion question because he was merely agreeing with the GOP pro-life position of “an exception for the LIFE of the mother” of the mother.
This is a guy who is telling us about “exceptions” to the GOP party platform position:
BLITZER: So, just to be precise, if you believe life begins at conception, which I suspect you do believe that, you would have no exceptions for rape, incest, the life of the mother, is that right?
PAUL: Well, I think that once again puts things in too small of a box. What I would say is that there are thousands of exceptions.
“” I don’t think it’s a simple as checking box and saying exceptions or no exceptions.””
“”And there are a lot of decisions that are made privately by families and their doctors that really won’t — the law won’t apply to, but I think it’s important that we not be flippant one way or the other and pigeon hole and say, oh, this person doesn’t believe in any sort of discussion between family. And so, I don’t know if there’s a simple way to put me in a category on any of that.””
BLITZER: Well, it sounds like you believe in some exceptions.
PAUL: Well, there’s going to be, like I say, thousands of extraneous situations where the life of the mother is involved *”and other things that are involved”*.
So, I would say that each individual case would have to be addressed and even if there were eventually a change in the law, let’s say, the people came more to my way of thinking, it’s still be a lot of complicated things that the law may not ultimately be able to address in the early stages of pregnancy that would have to be part of what occurs between the physician and the woman and the family.
What is wrong with people bump to read later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.