Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lindsey Graham, cruising to primary victory, tackles controversial issues on campaign trail
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | 4/29/14 | Rebecca Berg

Posted on 04/29/2014 7:03:10 AM PDT by cotton1706

SPARTANBURG, S.C. -- When Sen. Lindsey Graham received a major endorsement last week from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the setting was, from a campaign-optics perspective, nearly perfect.

Graham, joined by representatives from the national and regional arms of the organization, stood in a vast warehouse of a local manufacturer, where he was flanked by supporters holding signs. But as Graham began to speak, a driving rain pounded the warehouse roof, drowning out all other noise. The Republican senator had no microphone, and so he did his best to yell out his remarks.

Had Graham been facing a competitive challenge to his re-election this year, the inclement weather might have ruined an important campaign event. But Graham isn't, and the soggy audio didn't matter.

Instead, Graham, counter to the early prognostications of many, has quelled any potential threats from Tea Party insurgents and, two months ahead of the Republican primary, is cruising to a third term in the Senate -- still gleefully tackling those controversial topics that might have made him vulnerable in the first place.

Graham is in this position by no accident. Wary of other incumbents who have not prepared for competitive re-election campaigns and lost, Graham and his campaign team have spent the intervening years raising money and shoring up support among South Carolina's political class -- all but guaranteeing Graham's path to victory.

Graham's longtime campaign manager, Scott Farmer, recalled a motto beloved by former South Carolina Sen. Strom Thurmond to describe Graham's approach: “Senator Thurmond had a saying: ‘You always run like you're behind and take nothing for granted.' Sen. Graham has always taken that advice to heart and run very aggressive campaigns.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
If Graham is again the nominee, the people of South Carolina may have to consider whether the democrat nominee is more conservative than Graham, and more representative of their interests than the vile oligarch, Graham.
1 posted on 04/29/2014 7:03:10 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The sheeple are easily led. Just saying.


2 posted on 04/29/2014 7:05:34 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Please SC, dump this turd.


3 posted on 04/29/2014 7:08:06 AM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

The premise of this piece is not necessarily true. “Dewey Defeats Truman”


4 posted on 04/29/2014 7:09:22 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
But as Graham began to speak, a driving rain pounded the warehouse roof, drowning out all other noise.

God Votes!

5 posted on 04/29/2014 7:10:41 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

What’s the matter with South Caroliners? Didn’t they just send that flake Mark Sanford to Capitol Hill to represent them in Congress?


6 posted on 04/29/2014 7:11:11 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

My, my. All the action words implying brave derring-do on the part of Lindsey Graham. What’s next, feats of strength? Do these people not realize how ridiculous this sounds?


7 posted on 04/29/2014 7:12:06 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
The sheeple are easily led. Just saying.

There's a good deal more to it than just that. Dig a little deeper into the S.C. red clay and you will see.
8 posted on 04/29/2014 7:12:34 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

The sheeple have elected him over and over again since 1995. No reason to believe it will be any different this time around. A certain percentage of people would have to start thinking for themselves and that’s quite an unlikely scenario.


9 posted on 04/29/2014 7:13:34 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

LOL! Good post.


10 posted on 04/29/2014 7:14:21 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
What’s the matter with South Caroliners? Didn’t they just send that flake Mark Sanford to Capitol Hill to represent them in Congress?

Charleston district, I believe. Wish I could have voted for him.
11 posted on 04/29/2014 7:16:09 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Basically a government entity endorses an incumbent (or any) person running for office. There is just so may things wrong there.


12 posted on 04/29/2014 7:17:41 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Send him back and SC can finally quit the little act where they act like they are so conservative.

They are no more so than Rhode Island.


13 posted on 04/29/2014 7:18:51 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

You just know it’s worse than they’re letting on when Lindsey trots out Strom Thurmond.


14 posted on 04/29/2014 7:22:28 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
If Graham is again the nominee, the people of South Carolina may have to consider whether the democrat nominee is more conservative than Graham, and more representative of their interests than the vile oligarch, Graham.

Well, he IS the ideal conservative Senator for 4 months out of every 6 years.

But about your statement regarding what to do if he wins the primary: It's the press and GOPe (Lindsey's many minions) who have declared him the assured winner. We still have a primary June 10th and a possible run-off three weeks later. Let's wait and see what happens first.
15 posted on 04/29/2014 7:22:57 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Not surprising the Chamber backed him. They support illegals and one-worldism.

I can’t believe the people of SC haven’t dropped this guy yet.


16 posted on 04/29/2014 7:23:23 AM PDT by ZULU (Devil Patrick FREE Justina Pelletier!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

They’re Republican and many still confuse that with conservatism. The two were pretty closely associated at one point. That point has passed.


17 posted on 04/29/2014 7:23:57 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Send him back and SC can finally quit the little act where they act like they are so conservative. They are no more so than Rhode Island.

Do you REALLY think that's true? Or did you just get a speeding ticket here?
18 posted on 04/29/2014 7:24:29 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Sad but true...!


19 posted on 04/29/2014 7:25:24 AM PDT by swampfox101 (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

At least we keep the R which is needed to have any voice in the Senate and House. Keep in mind we cannot stop the communists Democrats unless we build the R base regardless because we do not like a RINO. We have no power to stop this dictatorship because we do not have the Senate. The speaker has control of the floor and bills from the House goes nowhere. If we can get a super majority in the Senate we can dethrone King Obama. Better chance than we have now.


20 posted on 04/29/2014 7:45:50 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson