Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Genetic-Clock Research Challenges Millions of Years
Institute for Creation Research ^ | April 2014 | Nathaniel T. Jeanson, Ph.D.

Posted on 04/29/2014 9:11:43 AM PDT by fishtank

New Genetic-Clock Research Challenges Millions of Years

by Nathaniel T. Jeanson, Ph.D. *

Does a 6,000-year-old earth match the findings of modern science? Secular scientists have answered forcefully in the negative for generations. However, their arguments rest on the assumption of constant natural processes and constant rates, and new discoveries from ICR’s geneticists present a strong challenge to these claims.

Genetic “Clocks”

Ticking within every species is a “clock” of sorts that measures the length of time that a species has existed on the earth. Since DNA is passed on imperfectly from parent to offspring, each generation grows more genetically distant from prior generations. Consequently, with each successive generation reproductively isolated groups within species grow more and more genetically distant from each other.

...more at link

(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: belongsinreligion; creation; freeformfantasy; mitochondrial; notanewstopic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: rjsimmon

This does not take into account the expansion of time and space from the creation. About a thousand years ago Rabbi Nachmanides deduced the Big Bang from the Torah. MIT professor Dr. Gerald Schroeder extrapolates from that a remarkable reconciliation of the 6 days of creation and the 14 billion years of geologic time. His book, Genesis and the Big Bang, is fascinating reading.


21 posted on 04/29/2014 10:34:31 AM PDT by Hootowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

It’s a great question. I’ve asked it myself.


22 posted on 04/29/2014 10:35:07 AM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl

That sounds fascinating. I shall endeavor to find a copy. Thank you.


23 posted on 04/29/2014 10:39:57 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt
I'll share what I personally think. I think somewhere before Gen 1:2, Lucifer fell and "all hell broke loose" literally. Since Lucifer was apparently in charge of God's created realm, the universe, Lucifer and his realm became dark. IMO, that is why the universe is dark and why "the earth was without form and void and darkness was upon the face of the deep" (Gen 1:2).

IMO, what follows is God beginning to redeem His physical universe. The story of redemption is always a greater story than the story of creation. In this case, creation as we know it was also the beginning of God's redeeming His fallen, physical universe. Pretty cool, huh? All of the above is just my personal opinion.

However, later, we all know what happened. God redeemed something much more valuable than His physical universe: His prized creation, man, redeemed by the blood of His precious Son, Jesus. This redemptive work of Christ for man was much greater than the original creation and redemption of a fallen universe. The subject of the age of the earth and creation is interesting, but doesn't compare to the majesty and eternal value of redemption by the blood of Jesus Christ.

24 posted on 04/29/2014 11:03:18 AM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fishtank; Admin Moderator
This is NOT News/Activism !
25 posted on 04/29/2014 11:14:54 AM PDT by tomkat (3% +1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

“The subject of the age of the earth and creation is interesting, but doesn’t compare to the majesty and eternal value of redemption by the blood of Jesus Christ.”

Amen!


26 posted on 04/29/2014 11:19:55 AM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

The Scriptures say that during the 800 years he had other sons and daughters. Able was born after Eden.


27 posted on 04/29/2014 11:42:21 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
For the sake of calm, reasoned argument, you would do well to take the time to watch How the Earth Was Made - origins of geology(my description)
28 posted on 04/29/2014 12:35:23 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Sorry, I was unclear in the link description. The title of the video is How the Earth Was Made. I added “origins of geology” as a further description of the video. I do think it is well worth the time to view as it is well made and not impossibly technical. In other words, I can follow it. :-}


29 posted on 04/29/2014 12:45:19 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
The Scriptures say that during the 800 years he had other sons and daughters. Able was born after Eden.

Not the point of my thesis and I am well aware of when Abel was born. My theory is that the sons named to Adam and Eve were AFTER the fall and eviction from Eden. I believe that Adam and Eve had lots of children while IN Eden. I first came to this conclusion after reading (for the umpteenth time) the punishment of Eve.

He told the woman, "I'll greatly increase the pain of your labor during childbirth. It will be painful for you to bear children." Gen 3:16.

The Lord "incresed" her pain. You cannot increase something that did not exist. He also said that it will be painful for you to bear children, implying that she has done so previously.

This is merely a working theory, but it fits into the narrative of Cain and leaving to find others and eventually marrying one.

30 posted on 04/29/2014 12:46:11 PM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tomkat; Admin Moderator

I respectfully disagree.

How we think and what we think

has a direct bearing on what we do

and who we are.

This is a timely news article.

Do you think that the American Revolution was divorced from how the Founders thought about the interplay of religion, politics and philosophy?


31 posted on 04/30/2014 7:57:41 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson