Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: GIdget2004
No photo ID to buy guns or alcohol either?
Equal treatment under the law?
2 posted on
04/29/2014 11:38:11 AM PDT by
DTogo
(High time to bring back The Sons of Liberty !!)
To: GIdget2004
Good God never a moments peace in this State.
Walker talked about a special session specifically to redo Voter ID even ahead of this ruling.
3 posted on
04/29/2014 11:38:39 AM PDT by
MNlurker
To: GIdget2004
Can't have no honest voting, ya know. The rats would be in jeopardy. All enemies of America would be in jeopardy. Can't have that.
4 posted on
04/29/2014 11:39:42 AM PDT by
no-to-illegals
(Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
To: GIdget2004
The fact that poor people can’t be expected to have proper ID kinda helps explain all that WELFARE FRAUD too, doesn’t it?
Holy crap our so-called watchdogs of the law are even morons.
5 posted on
04/29/2014 11:39:43 AM PDT by
Mich Patriot
(Pitch black is the new "tranparent.")
To: GIdget2004
When the donkeys find out 0bamacare requires photo ID, they will be against it too.
6 posted on
04/29/2014 11:39:46 AM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: GIdget2004
” disproportionately excluded poor and minority voters because they’re less likely to have photo IDs or the documents needed to get them.”
Doesn’t stop them from getting EBT cards and the such. Just saying.
7 posted on
04/29/2014 11:39:52 AM PDT by
Stormdog
(A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
To: GIdget2004
Do the poor and minorities have to show ID’s to get welfare benefits. I believe they do. Unfair burden?
8 posted on
04/29/2014 11:40:09 AM PDT by
fhayek
To: GIdget2004
Take Lynn out to the old oak and tar/feather her. Run her out of town...
This so far exceeds judicial authority it is a crime.
9 posted on
04/29/2014 11:40:37 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(Tri nornar eg bir. Binde til rota...)
To: GIdget2004
But Adelman sided with opponents, who said it disproportionately excluded poor and minority voters because they’re less likely to have photo IDs or the documents needed to get them.
This country was founded on individual rights, not group rights. One is not “poor” or “minority”. Rather, one is an individual that either can or can’t prove he is a citizen. And the inability to do so may, in fact, cause one to be poor, but that doesn’t mean one should therefore not have to do the same thing any other person has to do to be able to vote.
This is absolutely a dispicable decision. Voting in this state is a waste of time and effort.
To: GIdget2004
As in Kansas, I wonder if they can dig up even ONE eligible voter who is unable to obtain the proper I.D.
11 posted on
04/29/2014 11:40:55 AM PDT by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: GIdget2004
Something is un-Constitutional because it’s a burden?
My kid thinks brushing his teeth is a burden. Does that make it un-Constitutional?
Apparently this Adelman creep thinks so.
To: GIdget2004
Put their picture on their EBT card.
Two vultures with one stone.
13 posted on
04/29/2014 11:41:49 AM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
(You can count my felonies by looking at my FR replies.)
To: GIdget2004
From Wikipedia...
"Adelman was nominated by President Bill Clinton..."
15 posted on
04/29/2014 11:42:33 AM PDT by
lormand
(Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)
To: GIdget2004; afraidfortherepublic
16 posted on
04/29/2014 11:42:57 AM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: GIdget2004
Perhaps people should simply not vote on anything in this country any more. Just give it to a judge first and let them decide. < /s>
20 posted on
04/29/2014 11:44:41 AM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
To: GIdget2004
Then why even bother having elections... let the judges decide who rules over us.. they decide everything else...
22 posted on
04/29/2014 11:45:09 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
To: GIdget2004
Activist liberal Judge ignoring
Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, 553 U.S. 181 (2008): United States Supreme Court case holding that an Indiana law requiring voters to provide photo IDs did not violate the Constitution of the United States.
24 posted on
04/29/2014 11:46:00 AM PDT by
Mechanicos
(When did we amend the Constitution for a 2nd Federal Prohibition?)
To: GIdget2004
Next stop, hopefully ... The Supreme Court.
25 posted on
04/29/2014 11:46:02 AM PDT by
OldNavyVet
(Looking forward to November elections.)
To: GIdget2004
I’ll bet the poor and minority people need an ID to get into this judge’s courthouse.
27 posted on
04/29/2014 11:50:16 AM PDT by
henkster
(Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
To: GIdget2004
ID “unfairly burdens poor and minority voters”? LIAR.
U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman is a DEMOCRAT.
Democrats are waging war on the United States.
29 posted on
04/29/2014 11:51:02 AM PDT by
Ray76
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson