Posted on 04/30/2014 6:57:33 AM PDT by markomalley
That's interesting, because I remember a case several years ago where a state supreme court decision came down allowing the use of detectors. I don't remember the state, but I remember one specific line in the decision, to wit:
"If the police choose to use surreptitious and clandestine means of surveilling the public, this same public has a right to learn of the surveillance by any means available."
Whether this could be used today in a case in a different state is beyond my knowledge, but there it is.
For a passive device such as a radar detector to be illegal is patently absurd. I doubt it could even pass Constitutional muster.
Agreed that it is a crazy law. I’m not sure how high a challenge has gone in Virginia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.