Carney clashes with Jon Karl: That Benghazi e-mail from Ben Rhodes wasn’t about Benghazi

Hotair ^

[logi_cal869]

I wouldn’t characterize it as anything resembling ‘analysis’ (more resembling a bar debate), but thanks.

It was a long day and, imho, they’re all very good and unanswered questions.

The ‘spin machine’ was just on the radio here (some ‘Doctor’ of some group back east for some think tank). The left is so desperate to keep this from getting attached to the Oval Office I think they’ll go to any length at this point.

One possibility: One reason I think that “THE email” of contention didn’t get ‘deleted’ was some loyalists to Hillary still in State or, perhaps, some very pissed off CIA people.

Another possibility: One thing I didn’t address in the rambling queries: Did anyone else get ‘just a bit’ of deja vu from that email? You know, related to a certain ‘memo’ about a decade ago?

I think it’s important to note that while everyone agrees that the WH had ‘something’ to do with Benghazi and the ‘coverup’ (the ‘video’ BS), this ‘tardy’ email raises my suspicions.

I don’t think enough questions are being asked as to why it wasn’t produced earlier and focusing too much on what it does (nevermind ‘doesn’t’) state...