Posted on 05/01/2014 9:06:10 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
On Thursday's broadcast of CNN's "New Day," network political analyst John King was critical of the White House's handling of the revelations in recently released Benghazi emails, particularly White House press secretary Jay Carney's interaction with ABC White House correspondent Jon Karl a day earlier.
“I don’t know how you can say this is not about Benghazi," King said. "If you look at the timeline of events, I can’t understand why the White House did this.”
Video at link
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
It needs to burst a little faster, IMHO.
And since John King’s comment, CNN has been covering Flight 370 and the NBA. I’m sure they will jump on the memo and committee hearings any minute now./s
HA HA HA! That's a good one. Stop - STOP puhleeze! Lapdog media is asking a stupid question like that? Really?
A phone call from the white house to the head guy of CNN will make King hang his head in shame and grovel an apology.
Carney, “Are you going to believe us or you own lying eyes?”
Carney had that smug look while arguing with Jon Karl of ABC. They got away with it on a bizarre explanation of a video protest. I think Carney believe he can do it again. Not about Benghazi, yeah, right.
Slate was pretty critical too!
Benghazi was about swapping the Blind Sheik for our Ambassador.
Uninvited armed “help” messed that up.
Are the Rats jumping the sinking ship?
He abandoned the Americans in Benghazi because he was hiding the transfer of MANPADS and other war material from Libya to Syria.
“Phony scandal”?
ick that Carney is a nasty little pos
Isn’t it a little late for CNN to start pretending they’re journalists rather than the dem butt kissers we’ve gotten to know them as?
And Jonathan Karl also acting as though this info has caused himself to finally realize what happened in Benghazi too..
Could it be that Sheryl Atkinsons revelations have had an impact such that some LSM "journalists" have to put on a show of actually doing their jobs for appearances sake?
that doesnt make sense
Must check The Boston Globe.
I’m sure they are all over this./s
.
Did you see Joe Trippi on FOX a bit ago? He stuttered and stammered his way through that segment like he was seriously rattled.
There had to be something else that was going on, beyond running guns to Syria.
The gun-running aspect could be immediately defused by two words: Iran-Contra.
So, what else would require a hastily manufactured cover-up -- one hatched on the spot that the administration would cling to desperately as it became more and more tattered with every day?
I submit there was a pre-arrangement between Obama and Morsi to kidnap the Ambassador, then trade him for the Blind Sheikh. As part of the agreement, it was understood there would be no serious resistance to the terrorists. However, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods undertook to resist -- disobeying orders to do so. In the ensuing violence, Stevens lost his life -- thereby destroying the original objective of the exercise.
When the White House found that Stevens was dead, it was time to implement a cover-up on short notice.
Not bursting, just a tiny leak....it will be plugged quickly and he will be back on the plantation hoeing his row
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.