Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whatever Happened to Free-Speech Panic? ^ | May 2, 2014 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 05/02/2014 4:44:31 AM PDT by Kaslin

After the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001, members of the American left found one thing they could all agree on: America's Our First Amendment rights were in peril.

The American Prospect insisted on Sept. 12, when the rubble was still burning and the dead had not yet been retrieved, that "a number of government agencies and their cheerleaders would be clearly tempted to lock the Bill of Rights away in some basement dustbin of the National Archives." Two weeks later, novelist Barbara Kingsolver warned, "Patriotism threatens free speech with death." She bravely attacked the claim that "free speech is un-American." Author Richard Reeves penned an op-ed for The New York Times under the headline "Patriotism Calls Out the Censor." Conferences were rapidly convened, vows to fight the crackdown on free speech were issued.

The fact that this response was elicited by no actual crackdown on free speech seemed irrelevant. It was a classic example of "Fire, ready, aim!"

Later, when there was at least some theoretical basis to be concerned about lost liberties, the reaction from prominent liberals was nonetheless unhinged. White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, goaded by the press to respond to a bigoted comment from a Republican congressman and a typically stupid comment from "comedian" Bill Maher, said such statements are "reminders to all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they do. This is not a time for remarks like that; there never is."

Then-New York Times columnist Frank Rich spent much of the next five years treating this comment as the end of liberty in America. He even said Fleischer's comment was as significant as the terror attack itself. "Even as we're constantly told we're in a war for 'freedom' abroad," Rich wrote, "freedom in our culture at home has been under attack ever since."

I will admit I was vexed by this riot of knee-jerkery. At the time, I largely agreed with then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, who said: "To those ... who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists."

But in retrospect, I have a bit more sympathy with those self-anointed defenders of free speech. It was, in its way, a thoroughly American, even patriotic reaction. Edmund Burke, the founder of modern conservatism, remarked -- in 1775! -- that the proto-Americans of the colonies had a tendency to nip attacks on liberty in the bud. "In other countries the people ... judge of an ill principle in government only by an actual grievance," but in the American colonies, "they anticipate the evil, and judge of the pressure of the grievance by the badness of the principle. They augur misgovernment at a distance and snuff the approach of tyranny in every tainted breeze."

Fast-forward to another September 11. Failing to anticipate a terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9/11, four Americans, including our ambassador, were murdered in a pre-planned and coordinated terrorist assault in Libya. White House officials said they believed it wasn't a terrorist attack but a spontaneous reaction to a video insulting the Muslim prophet Muhammad. There is a debate as to whether they knew all along that was untrue. There is no real debate that officials learned very early that it was untrue and continued to lie about it -- or at least wildly and dishonestly exaggerate the role the video played.

President Obama and his secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, hammered the video story. Clinton vowed to the grieving families of the victims that she would get the makers of the video, not the murderers themselves. The White House asked Google if it could censor the video from YouTube. Google partially complied, blocking it in Libya and Egypt. (Later, a U.S. appeals court ordered the film removed entirely.)

Our embassy in Egypt was widely seen to apologize for the video in a statement to protestors there. The administration bought television ads on Pakistani TV apologizing for the video and disassociating the U.S. from it. Obama spoke to the U.N. about the video, explaining that we can't ban such things because of our Constitution. Still, the director was arrested. A picture of him being hauled off in handcuffs was splashed in newspapers around the world.

Subtle, that.

All this fueled an earnest debate about the downside of free speech in America. Cable news networks, op-ed pages and public radio lit up with "expert" commentary about how we must find ways to accommodate the sensibilities of Muslims who don't understand or care about free speech. And much of the crowd that once set about to "snuff the approach of tyranny in every tainted breeze" when George W. Bush was president said nary a word.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: freespeech; panic; resident0bama

1 posted on 05/02/2014 4:44:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
What happened to the revenge on terrorists?
Those who died falling on 911, would be surprised
to know that America has given up, and is run by a Moslem
and an ultracorrupt EXEMPT self-serving CONGRESS
absolutely DEDICATED to arming al Qaeda to murder more Americans.


2 posted on 05/02/2014 4:47:29 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The difference whether free speech is "good" or "bad" seems to be entirely dependent on who's in the White House.

3 posted on 05/02/2014 4:56:04 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Why are we the ones to surrender liberty?

Shouldn't it be the SLIMES!?!?

Slavery is ILLEGAL in ALL CIVILIZED nations.

Slavery is LEGAL in ALL MUSLIM nations.

Ban the queeran! Send muhHamhead back to satanallah's sandbox!

4 posted on 05/02/2014 4:56:53 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall ; / ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It goes back way before 9/11. In the 50s through 80s, the Left was adamant that all speech, no matter how vile (and they were inventing new types of vile), had to be protected.

Any curb, however slight, was denounced as the first step on the slippery slope. They were insistent that banning such things as rape how-to guides would end in curtailing free political speech.

Now that they have they control the culture, they are still OK with things that are vile, but they are insistent on banning free political speech.

The Left always had and will always have the heart of a totalitarian.

5 posted on 05/02/2014 5:37:28 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
 photo FREENATION_zps6b6c3980.png
6 posted on 05/02/2014 5:50:52 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

During the Clinton years, the Clintons tried using the OKC bombing in 1995 to make any political disagreement with the Clinton WH illegal.

Had that car bomb gone off in NYC in 2010 and the dems been successful in pining it on the TEA Party, anyone with a political disagreement with the WH would have been declared a terrorist.

An exact same repeat of what the Clinton’s tried with the OKC bombing.

Have you noticed how the same thing is happening with the IRS targeting the TEA Party and wanting to have them arrested for political disagreement, and it’s not for Obamas reelection, he’s been reelected and they are still doing it.

Let’s not overlook the talking points from the left of how the returning Vets are racist, anti govt., extremist like Tim McVeigh.

Now that they have their talking points in place, all the Obama WH needs now is another OKC/NYC fertilizer car bomb and let the roundup begin.

7 posted on 05/02/2014 6:23:05 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson